Do Stronger Patents Stimulate or Stifle Innovation? The Crucial Role of Financial Development

Chu, Angus C. and Cozzi, Guido and Pan, Shiyuan and Zhang, Mengbo (2016): Do Stronger Patents Stimulate or Stifle Innovation? The Crucial Role of Financial Development.

Abstract

This study explores the effects of patent protection in a distance-to-frontier R&D-based growth model with financial frictions. We find that whether stronger patent protection stimulates or stifles innovation depends on credit constraints faced by R&D entrepreneurs. When credit constraints are non-binding (binding), strengthening patent protection stimulates (stifles) R&D. The overall effect of patent protection on innovation follows an inverted-U pattern. An excessively high level of patent protection prevents a country from converging to the world technology frontier. A higher level of financial development influences credit constraints through two channels: decreasing the interest-rate spread and increasing the default cost. Via the interest-spread (default-cost) channel, patent protection is more likely to have a negative (positive) effect on innovation under a higher level of financial development. We test these results using cross-country regressions and find supportive evidence for the interest-spread channel.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Patent protection, credit constraints, economic growth, convergence
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

References

Acemoglu, D., 2009. Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton University Press.

Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., and Zilibotti, F., 2006. Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 37-74.

Aghion, P., Howitt, P., and Mayer-Foulkes, D., 2005. The effect of financial development on convergence: Theory and evidence. Quarter Journal of Economics, 120, 173-222.

Ang, J., 2010. Financial reforms, patent protection and knowledge accumulation in India. World Development, 38, 1070-1081.

Ang, J., 2011. Financial development, liberalization and technological deepening. European Economic Review, 55, 688-701.

Barro, R., and Lee, J.-W., 2013. A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950-2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184-198.

Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., and Levine, R., 2010. Financial institutions and markets across countries and over time: The updated financial development and structure database. World Bank Economic Review, 24, 77-92.

Bessen, J., and Meurer, M., 2008. Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk. Princeton University Press.

Boldrin, M., and Levine, D., 2008. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press.

Chu, A., 2009. Effects of blocking patents on R&D: A quantitative DGE analysis. Journal of Economic Growth, 14, 55-78.

Chu, A., Cozzi, G., and Galli, S., 2012. Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation? European Economic Review, 56, 727-746.

Chu, A., Cozzi, G., and Galli, S., 2014. Stage-dependent intellectual property rights. Journal of Development Economics, 106, 239-249.

Chu. A., and Pan, S., 2013. The escape-infringement effect of blocking patents on innovation and economic growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 17, 955-969.

Cihak, M., Demirg-Kunt, A., Feyen, E., and Levine, R., 2012. Benchmarking financial development around the world. Policy Research Working Paper 6175.

Cozzi, G., and Galli, S., 2014. Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 19, 183-219.

Davis, L., and Sener, F., 2012. Private patent protection in the theory of Schumpeterian growth. European Economic Review, 56, 1446-1460.

Dinopoulos, E., and Syropoulos, C., 2007. Rent protection as a barrier to innovation and growth. Economic Theory, 32, 309-332.

Furukawa, Y., 2007. The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, 3644-3670.

Gilbert, R., and Shapiro, C. 1990. Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 106-112.

Ginarte, J., and Park, W., 1997. Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research Policy, 26, 283-301.

Goh, A.-T., and Olivier, J., 2002. Optimal patent protection in a two-sector economy. International Economic Review, 43, 1191-1214.

Heston, A., Summers, R., and Aten, B., 2012. Penn World Table version 7.1. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.

Horii, R., and Iwaisako, T., 2007. Economic growth with imperfect protection of intellectual property rights. Journal of Economics, 90, 45-85.

Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2013. Patent protection, capital accumulation, and economic growth. Economic Theory, 52, 631-668.

Jaffe, A., and Lerner, J., 2004. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton University Press.

Jones, C., and Williams, J., 2000. Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 65-85.

Judd, K., 1985. On the performance of patents. Econometrica, 53, 567-586.

Kiedaisch, C., 2015. Intellectual property rights in a quality-ladder model with persistent leadership. European Economic Review, 80, 194-213.

King, R., and Levine, R., 1993. Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 717-737.

Klemperer, P., 1990. How broad should the scope of patent protection be? RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 113-130.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R., 1999. The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15, 222-279.

Lerner, J., 2009. The empirical impact of intellectual property rights on innovation: Puzzles and clues. American Economic Review, 99, 343-348.

Levine, R., Loayza, N., and Beck, T., 2000. Financial intermediation and growth: Causality and causes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46, 31-77.

Li, C.-W., 2001. On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. Economic Journal, 111, C164-C179.

Nordhaus, W., 1969. Invention, Growth, and Welfare. The MIT Press.

O'Donoghue, T., and Zweimuller, J., 2004. Patents in a model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 81-123.

Park, W., 2009. International patent protection: 1960-2005. Research Policy, 27, 761-766.

Park, W., and Ginarte, J., 1997. Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15, 51-61.

Qian, Y., 2007. Do national patent laws stimulate domestic innovation in a global patenting environment? A cross-country analysis of pharmaceutical patent protection, 1978-2002. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 436-453.

Scotchmer, S., 2004. Innovation and Incentives. The MIT Press.