Sinha, Pankaj and Nagarnaik, Ankit and Raj, Kislay and Suman, Vineeta
(2016):
*Forecasting United States Presidential election 2016 using multiple regression models.*

Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_74641.pdf Download (985kB) | Preview |

## Abstract

The paper analyses economic and non-economic factors in order to develop a forecasting model for 2016 US Presidential election and predict it. The discussions on forthcoming US Presidential election mention that campaign fund amount and unemployment will be a deciding factor in the election, but our research indicates that campaign fund amount and unemployment are not significant factors for predicting the vote share of the incumbent party. But in case of non–incumbent major opposition party (challenger party) campaign fund amount does play a role. Apart from unemployment other economic factors such as inflation, exchange rate, interest rate, deficit/surplus, gold prices are also found to be insignificant. Growth of economy is found to be significant factor for non-incumbent major opposition party and not for incumbent party. The study also finds that non-economic factors such as June Gallup rating, Gallup index, average Gallup, power of period factor, military intervention, president running, percentage of white voters and youth voters voting for the party are significant factors for forecasting the vote share of either incumbent party or non-incumbent major opposition party/challenger party. The proposed models forecasts with 95% confidence interval that Democratic party is likely to get vote share of 48.11% with a standard error of ±2.18% and the non-incumbent Republican party is likely to get vote share of 40.26% with a standard error ±2.35%.

Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|

Original Title: | Forecasting United States Presidential election 2016 using multiple regression models |

English Title: | Forecasting United States Presidential election 2016 using multiple regression models |

Language: | English |

Keywords: | Regression model,US Presidential election,economic and non-economic variables, |

Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling |

Item ID: | 74641 |

Depositing User: | Pankaj Sinha |

Date Deposited: | 18 Oct 2016 18:09 |

Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 16:21 |

References: | Abramowitz A. I. (1988). An Improved Model for Predicting the Outcomes of Presidential Elections. PS: Political Science and Politics, 21 4, 843-847 Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012a). Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm#unemployed. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012b).). Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2012). Table 3.12. Government Social Benefits, retrieved from http://www.bea.gov/national/index.htm#gdp. Campbell, J. E. (1992). Forecasting the Presidential Vote in the States. American Journal of Political Science, 36 2,386-407. Cuzán, A. G., Heggen R.J., & Bundrick C.M. (2000). Fiscal policy, economic conditions, and terms in office: simulating presidential election outcomes. In Proceedings of the World Congress of the Systems Sciences and ISSS International Society for the Systems Sciences, 44th Annual Meeting, July 16–20, Toronto, Canada. Fair, R.C. (2002) Predicting Presidential election and other things Second Edition. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Fair, R.C. (2006). The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President: 2004 Update. Retrieved from: http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/RAYFAIR/PDF/2006CHTM.HTM Fair, R.C. (2008). 2008 Post Mortem. Retrieved from: http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/vote2008/index2.htm Fair, R. C. (2012). Vote-Share Equations: November 2010 Update. Retrieved from: http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/vote2012/index2.htm Fair, R.C. (2016). Vote-Share Equations: November 2014 Update, retrieved from http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/vote2016/index2.htm. Federal Reserve (2016) Historical data retrieved from http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/data.htm. Finkel, Steven E (1993). “Re-examining the minimal effects model in recent Presidential campaign” The Journal of politics, Vol. 55, No. 1 (Feb 1993), pp. 1-21. Gallup Presidential Poll. (2016). Presidential Job Approval Centre, retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/presidential-approval-center.aspx. Hibbs D. A. (2000). Bread and Peace voting in U.S. presidential elections. Public Choice, 104, 149–180. Hibbs D. A. (2012). Obama’s Re-election Prospects Under ‘Bread and Peace’ Voting in the 2012 US Presidential Election. retrieved from: http://www.douglashibbs.com/HibbsArticles/HIBBS_OBAMA-REELECT-31July2012r1.pdf International Monetary Fund. (2010). Historical Public Debt Database, retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/data/wp10245.zip. InflationData.com. (2012). Historical Crude Oil Prices (Table). Retrieved from http://inflationdata.com/inflation/Inflation_Rate/Historical_Oil_Prices_Table.asp. Jacobson G.C. (2006), Measuring Campaign spending effects in US house elections, Capturing campaign effects, 199-220 Lewis-Beck, M. S. & Rice, T. W. (1982).Presidential Popularity and Presidential Vote. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 46 4, 534-537. Lichtman, A. J., and Keilis-Borok, V. I. (1981). “Pattern Recognition Applied to Presidential Elections in the United States, 1860-1980: Role of Integral Social, Economic and Political Traits,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Vol. 78, No. 11, pp. 7230-7234 Lazarsfeld, Berleson and Gaudet (1968) The People’s Choice: how the voter make up his mind in presidential campaign New York: Columbia University Press Monroe K R and Laughlin D.M.(1983), Economic influences on presidential popularity among key political and socioeconomic groups: A review of the evidence and some new findings. Political behaviour, 5, 309-345 Mueller J.E.(1970), Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson. The American Political science review, 64, 18-34. 22. Sinha, Pankaj & Sharma, Aastha & Singh, Harsh Vardhan, (2012). "Prediction for the 2012 United States Presidential Election using Multiple Regression Model," Journal of prediction markets,62,77-977. Sinha, Pankaj & Thomas, Ashley Rose & Ranjan, Varun, (2012). "Forecasting 2012 United States Presidential election using Factor Analysis, Logit and Probit Models," MPRA Paper 42062, University Library of Munich, Germany. Sigelman, L., (1979). Presidential popularity and presidential elections. Public Opinion Quarterly,43, 532-34. Silver, N. (2011). On the Maddeningly Inexact Relationship Between Unemployment and Re-Election, retrieved from http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/02/on-the-maddeningly-inexact-relationship-between-unemployment-and-re-election/. |

URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/74641 |