Does easy availability of cash effect corruption? Evidence from panel of countries

Singh, Sunny and Bhattacharya, Kaushik (2015): Does easy availability of cash effect corruption? Evidence from panel of countries.

Abstract

Using annual panel data of 54 countries for the period 2005-13, we examine whether cash in circulation, both aggregate and large denominated banknotes, affects the level of corruption in a country. Standard panel data models like pooled OLS, random effect and system GMM suggest that the ratios of (i) aggregate currency in circulation to M1 and, (ii) large denominated banknotes to M1 are both statistically significant determinants of corruption. Tests for reverse causality within a panel Granger framework reveal unidirectional causality of the first variable with corruption, but a bi-directional one with the second variable. These findings suggest that the central banks should try to limit the supply of banknotes of large denomination.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Control of corruption Index, Cash in circulation, Random effect model, System GMM
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E51 - Money Supply ; Credit ; Money Multipliers; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies

References

Abramo, C. W. (2008). How much do perceptions of corruption really tell us? Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 2, 3.

Aidt, T. S. (2003). Economic analysis of corruption: a survey*. The Economic Journal, 113(491), F632–F652. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.0013-0133.2003.00171.x

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. http://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=oQdx_70Xmy0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA13&ots=xj4f1I2tTw&sig=WgqkevMs6SjHoo2bV0DIwgbrKXI

Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.

Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8

Chowdhury, S. K. (2004). The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: an empirical test. Economics Letters, 85(1), 93–101. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.03.024

Dreher, A., & Siemers, L.-H. R. (2009). The nexus between corruption and capital account restrictions. Public Choice, 140(1-2), 245–265. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9423-1

Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014

Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014). E-Government, Internet Adoption, and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation. World Development, 57, 114–126. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.005

Elbahnasawy, N. G., & Revier, C. F. (2012). The Determinants of Corruption: Cross-Country-Panel-Data Analysis. The Developing Economies, 50(4), 311–333. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2012.00177.x

Freille, S., Haque, M. E., & Kneller, R. (2007). A contribution to the empirics of press freedom and corruption. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 838–862. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2007.03.002

Goel, R. K., & Mehrotra, A. N. (2012). Financial payment instruments and corruption. Applied Financial Economics, 22(11), 877–886. http://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2011.628295

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(02), 220–246. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046

Lio, M.-C., Liu, M.-C., & Ou, Y.-P. (2011). Can the internet reduce corruption? A cross-country study based on dynamic panel data models. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 47–53. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.01.005

Rogoff, K. (2002). The surprising popularity of paper currency. Finance and Development, 39(1), 56–7.

Rogoff, K., Giavazzi, F., & Schneider, F. (1998). Blessing or Curse? Foreign and Underground Demand for Euro Notes. Economic Policy, 13(26), 263–303.

Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Center for Global Development Working Paper, (103). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=982943

Roodman, D. (2009). A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x

Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press.

Seldadyo, H., & de Haan, J. (2006). The Determinants of Corruption: A Literature Survey and New Evidence, Working paper. University of Groningen.

Serra, D. (2006). Empirical determinants of corruption: A sensitivity analysis. Public Choice, 126(1-2), 225–256.

Svensson, J. (2005). Eight Questions about Corruption. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42.

Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4

Treisman, D. (2007). What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 211–244. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418

Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25–51. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005