Haque, Adnan ul and Aston, John and Kozlovski, Eugene (2016): Do causes and consequences of stress affect genders differently at operational level? Comparison of the IT sectors in the UK and Pakistan. Published in: International Journal of Applied Business and Management Studies , Vol. 1, No. 1 (17 December 2016): pp. 1-7.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_75849.pdf Download (219kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The aim is examining the variation in causes and consequences of stress among contrasting gender in I.T sector of Karachi (Pakistan) and London (UK). The potential impact of stressors on the organisational commitment of employees are examined through self-constructed ‘stress model’. Through snowball and purposive sampling techniques, total 419 respondents (205 from Karachi and 214 from London) were targeted to attain quantitative perspective through on-line matrix based semi-structured survey questionnaire. Results showed that there is significant difference in causes of stress among contrasting gender. Moreover, male workers experience higher stress than females at operational level. Further, London workforce experience lower stress than Karachi workforce due to social support programme at workplace. There is significant variation in causes of stress as findings showed personal factors are leading stressors for females while organisational and environmental factors causes stress for males. Job demand, leadership, and economic uncertainty are negatively affecting male’s organisational commitment while family problems and personality clashes are affecting female’s organisational commitment in contrasting economies. The consequences of stress are similar for both types of employees however, males showed cognitive symptoms while females are more effectively using personal resources to over their stress and exhibit behavioural symptoms. Females have higher affective and normative commitment while males demonstrate normative commitment. Pakistan workforce demonstrated high level of stress than UK workforce.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Do causes and consequences of stress affect genders differently at operational level? Comparison of the IT sectors in the UK and Pakistan |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | occupational stress, causes of stress, consequences of stress, organisational commitment, contrasting economies, social support |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M10 - General M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M12 - Personnel Management ; Executives; Executive Compensation |
Item ID: | 75849 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Adnan ul Nada |
Date Deposited: | 29 Dec 2016 06:54 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 18:41 |
References: | . Brannon, L., & Feist, J. (1992). Health psychology: An introduction to behaviour and health (2nd ed.). California: Brooks/Cole Publications. . Cicei, C. C. (2012). Occupational stress and organizational commitment in Romanian public organizations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 33, 1077 – 1081. . Ekundayo, J. A. (2014). Occupational stress and employees productivity in the workplace. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education. 7 (2), 157-165. . Fairbrother, K., & Warn, J. (2003). Workplace dimensions, stress and job satisfaction.Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18, 8-21. . Haque, A.U., &Yamoah, F. (2014). Gender employment longevity: I.T staff response to organizational support in Pakistan, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4 (12), 324-347. . Hemdi, M. A. (2009). Investigating hotel employees' organisational commitment: The influence of human reosurce management practices and perceived organizational support. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality & Culinary Arts, 1(3), 1-20. . Kets de Vries, M., Guillen Ramo, L., &Korotov, K. (2009).Orgnaizational Culture, Leadership, Change and Stress.In C. Cooper, Work and Health Psychology Handbook (pp. 21-35). London: Willey. . Kumasey, S.A., Delle, E. &Ofei, B.S. (2014) Occupational stress and organisational commitment: Does sex and managerial status matter? International Journal of Business and Social Research, 4, 173-182. . Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Psychological Stress in the Workplace.In P.L. Perrewe (Ed.).Handbook on job stress, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 1-13. . Mark, G. M. & Smith, A. P. (2008). Stress models: a review and suggested new direction. In: Houdmont, J. and Leka, S. eds. Occupational Health Psychology, European Perspectives On Research, Education and Practice, 3 (1). Nottingham University Press, 111-144. . Mathieu, J. E., &&Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment.Psychological Bulletin, 108 (2), 171-194. . Ofoegbu, F. &Nwandiani, M. (2006).Level of perceived stress among lecturers in Nigerian Universities.Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33 (1), 66-74. . Sackey, M., &Sanda, J. (2011). Sustenance of human capital: social support as a managerial stress reliever for women in developing economies. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 19(2), 1-23. . Schwarzer, R., &Leppin, A. (1991). Social support and health: A theoretical and empirical overview. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 99-127. . Selye, H. (1974). Stress without distress. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company. p. 171. . Stranks, J. (2005). Stress at work: management and prevention. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. Oxford. . Tan, S. L., & Lau, C. M. (2012). The impact of performance measures on employee fairness perceptions, job satisfaction and organisational commitment. Management Review, 10(2), 11-15. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/75849 |