Freshmen teachers and college major choice: Evidence from a random assignment in Chile

Karnani, Mohit (2016): Freshmen teachers and college major choice: Evidence from a random assignment in Chile.

Abstract

We exploit the exogenous characteristic of random freshmen course assignment in a large Chilean university to identify the causal effect of teachers and their qualitative characteristics over students' major choice. Using administrative records, we establish what makes students from the "Commercial Engineering" career chose between an "Economics" major or a "Business" major. We find that first-economic-course teachers may account for 15-22% of the probability of choosing Economics as a major. We also identify which characteristics of these teachers make students more prone to choosing this particular major. These results are robust to the inclusion of different covariates and specifications. Placebo-type falsification tests are performed, confirming our findings.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Freshmen, Teachers, College Major, Random Assignment
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity

References

Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton University Press.

Arcidiacono, P. (2004). Ability sorting and the returns to college major. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1–2), 343–375. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.010

Arcidiacono, P., Hotz, V. J., & Kang, S. (2012). Modeling college major choices using elicited measures of expectations and counterfactuals. Journal of Econometrics, 166(1), 3–16. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.06.002

Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2005). Do Faculty Serve as Role Models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students. American Economic Review, 95(2), 152–157. http://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670149

Bordon, P., & Fu, C. (2015). College-Major Choice to College-Then-Major Choice. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(4), 1247–1288. http://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv023

Canes, B. J., & Rosen, H. S. (1995). Following in Her Footsteps? Faculty Gender Composition and Women’s Choices of College Majors. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(3), 486–504. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2524777

Carrell, S. E., & West, J. E. (2010). Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors. Journal of Political Economy, 118(3), 409–432. http://doi.org/10.1086/653808

Chambliss, D. F., & Takacs, C. G. (2014). How college works. Harvard University Press.

Cho, D., Baek, W., & Cho, J. (2015). Why do good performing students highly rate their instructors? Evidence from a natural experiment. Economics of Education Review, 49, 172–179. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.10.001

Dee, T. S. (2004). Teachers, Race, and Student Achievement in a Randomized Experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 195–210. http://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323023750

Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M. (2007). Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit. In T. P. Schultz & J. A. Strauss (Eds.), Handbook of Development Economics (Vol. 4, pp. 3895–3962). Elsevier. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4471(07)04061-2

Glennerster, R., & Takavarasha, K. (2013). Running Randomized Evaluations: A Practical Guide. Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt4cgd52

Grove, W. A., & Wu, S. (2011). Factors Influencing Student Performance in Economics: Class and Instructor Characteristics. In International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.elgaronline.com/9781848449688.00052.xml

Hastings, J., Neilson, C. A., & Zimmerman, S. D. (2015). The Effects of Earnings Disclosure on College Enrollment Decisions (Working Paper Series). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21300

Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2289064

Imai, K., & Ratkovic, M. (2013). Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 7(1), 443–470. http://doi.org/10.1214/12-AOAS593

Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature.

Karnani, M. (2016). Freshmen Teachers and College Major Choice: Evidence from a Random Assignment in Chile. American Economic Association. Retrieved from http://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/1166

Keane, M. P. (2010). Structural vs. atheoretic approaches to econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 156(1), 3–20. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.09.003

Lehmann, E. L., & Romano, J. P. (2005). Testing Statistical Hypotheses (3rd edition). Springer.

Macmillan, L., Tyler, C., & Vignoles, A. (2015). Who Gets the Top Jobs? The Role of Family Background and Networks in Recent Graduates’ Access to High-status Professions. Journal of Social Policy, 44(3), 487–515. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000634

Montmarquette, C., Cannings, K., & Mahseredjian, S. (2002). How do young people choose college majors? Economics of Education Review, 21(6), 543–556. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00054-1

Paredes, V. (2014). A teacher like me or a student like me? Role model versus teacher bias effect. Economics of Education Review, 39, 38–49. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.12.001

Rask, K. N., & Bailey, E. M. (2002). Are Faculty Role Models? Evidence from Major Choice in an Undergraduate Institution. The Journal of Economic Education, 33(2), 99–124. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1183389

Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x

Rubin, D. B. (1977). Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2(1), 1–26. http://doi.org/10.3102/10769986002001001

Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701.

Sacerdote, B. (2001). Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 681–704. http://doi.org/10.1162/00335530151144131

Sohn, H. (2016). Mean and distributional impact of single-sex high schools on students’ cognitive achievement, major choice, and test-taking behavior: Evidence from a random assignment policy in Seoul, Korea. Economics of Education Review. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.02.007

Wiswall, M., & Zafar, B. (2015). Determinants of College Major Choice: Identification using an Information Experiment. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(2), 791–824. http://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu044

Wong, J. A., Hoxby, C. M., Levin, J. D., & Shoven, J. B. (2011). Essays on the Determinants of Student Choices and Educational Outcomes. Stanford University.

Zafar, B. (2013). College Major Choice and the Gender Gap. Journal of Human Resources, 48(3), 545–595. http://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.48.3.545