Family evolution and contemporary social transformations

Sergio, Reuben (2005): Family evolution and contemporary social transformations. Published in: Journal of comparative Family Studies , Vol. 37, No. No. 4

Abstract

In the first place, this paper intends to analyze the kind of relationships existing inside the family. In order to do that, the author makes an effort to reconsider its historical forming process applying the classical anthropological texts. At this stage, the analysis proposes two different types of relationships between human beings, the primal, which arose from the most elementary feelings of love, protection, accompaniment, and the strictly social, risen from the needs of cooperation and collective work. The family is the expression of both kinds of relationships. In the second place, this work analyzes the nuclear family as a result of a historical process associated to the development of capital and the social conditions that make possible its consolidation. And in the third place, the author proposes the discussion on the crisis of the nuclear family under the perspective of the contemporary global transformation of the accumulation of capital. As a conclusion: some reflections on the perspectives that these transformations offer to the role of the family.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Family, Kinship, Capital accumulation, Capitalism,Social relationships
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B14 - Socialist ; Marxist; H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H31 - Household; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B49 - Other; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J12 - Marriage ; Marital Dissolution ; Family Structure ; Domestic Abuse; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General

References

• Benedeck, Theresa, 1977, “Estructura emocional de la familia”, in Fromm, E., Horkhiemer, M., Parsons, T., et al, La Familia, Edit. Peninsula, Barcelona. Selection of articles from the book by Anshen, Ruth Nanda, The Family, Edit. Harper Brothers, New York, s.f. • Elias, Norbert, 1994, El proceso de la civilización, investigaciones sociogenéticas y psico-genéticas, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, First edition in German, 1977, 1979. • Engels Frederich, 1970, Obras escogidas, Vol. III: “El origen de la familia, la propiedad pri-vada y el estado”, Edit Progreso, Moscow. • Garcia de Diego, Vicente, 1980, Diccionario IIustrado Latino-Español-Latino VOX, 13th edi-tion, Biblograf S. A. Barcelona. • Gough, Kathleen, 1976A, “El origen de la familia” in Polémica sobre el origen y la universa-lidad de la familia, Ed. Anagrama, Barcelona translated by Luis Merino, from “The Origin of the Family”, Hogtown Press, Toronto, 1973 • .---1976B, “Los Nayar y la definición del matrimonio”, in Polémica sobre el origen y la uni-versalidad de la familia, Edit Anagrama, Barcelona, translated by Helena Valenti from “The Nayar and the definition of Marriage”, American Anthropologist, 1959. • Illouz, Eva, 1997, Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, Berkeley:University of California Press, Can be consulted in: http://www.familydiscussions.com/books/illouz.htm • Linton, Sally, 1979, “La mujer recolectora: sesgos machistas en Antropología”, in Harris. O., and Young, K, comp. Antropología y Feminismo, Edit. Anagrama, Barcelona. • López, María de la Paz, 1996, “Familia y Política Pública” in La Familia: Investigación y Po-lítica pública, El Colegio de México, México, D.F. • Levy-Strauss, Claude., 1976, “La familia”, in Polémica sobre la universalidad y origen de la familia, Edit Anagrama, Barcelona, translated by José R. Llovera from the original “The fa-mily” in Shapiro, Harry, I., Edit, Man, Cultura and Society, Oxford University Press, New Cork, 1956. • Marx, Karl 1982, Elementos fundamentales para la crítica de la economía política (Grundis-se) 1857-1858, 12th. edition, Siglo XXI editores, México. • --1977, El Capital, Vol I, fifth edition in Spanish , Eit. Siglo XXI, México. • Malinowsky, Bronislaw, 1982, Estudios de Psicología primitiva, el complejo de Edipo, Edit. Paidós Ibérica, Barcelona, First edition “The Myth in Primitive Psychology”, “The Father in Primitive Psychology” Edit. by Kegan P. and Trench T. & Co., London and “Mutterrechtliche familie und Oedipus-komplex”, Edit. by Internationaler Psychoanalystisher Verlag, Viena. • Parsons, Talcott, 1978, “La estructura social de la familia” in Fromm, El, Horkhiemer, M., Parsons, T., et al, La familia, Edit. Peninsula, 1978 Barcelona. Selection of articles from the book of Anshen, Ruth Nanda, The Family, Edt. Harper & Brothers, New York s.f. • Reuben Soto, Sergio, 1986, “Estructuras familiares de Costa Rica en 1973”, Avances de In-vestigacion, No. 57, Instituto de Investigaciones sociales, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José. • —1992, “Características familiares de los hogares costarricenses”, Mimeografiado, Instituto Mixto de Ayduda social, Vol, San José. A short version can also be seen in Contribuciones No.28, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José y en Cristina Gomes, Edit. Procesos Sociales, población y familia, Edit. FLACSO-México and Miguel Ángel Porrua, México, 2001, pp147-197. • —1995, Crónica de un (des)Ajuste Social, Edit. Vicerrectoría de Acción Social, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose. • —2000, “Política Social y familia”, Contrapunto, No.8. SINART, San José. Can also be con-sulted in Rosero B., Luis. Can be consulted at: http://www.fcs.ucr.ac.cr/~seres/index_archivos/PonenSemFam.htm • —2001, “El carácter histórico de la familia y las transformaciones sociales contemporá-neas”, Segunda época, Revista Reflexiones, 80(2), Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Univer-sidad de Costa Rica, San José, 2001. http://www.fcs.ucr.ac.cr/~seres/index_archivos/PonenciaGuatemala.htm • de Singly, Francois, 1999, “Le renforcement du marriage est dü à l’existence d’autres for-mes de vie commune”, Le Monde, 2 Mars, Paris. • Zablocki, Benjamín, 1973, “A model for Utopia”, in Schultz, D. and Wilson, R., Edit Read-ings on the Changing Family, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.