Neoclassical theories of stationary relative prices and the supply of capital

Fratini, Saverio M. (2017): Neoclassical theories of stationary relative prices and the supply of capital.

Abstract

In the traditional versions of the neoclassical theory of value and distribution, the stock of existing capital—understood as either an amount of value or an endowment of capital goods—was taken as given, together with the available quantities of labour and natural resources. This characteristic of the early neoclassical theories is analysed by the comparison with the modern neo-Walrasian models of stationary equilibrium, in which the stock of capital is not considered among the data. We show that the attempt to put capital on the same footing as labour and land—i.e. to present it as a factor of production—led the early neoclassical author to write the zero netaccumulation condition, which was required by the stationarity of relative prices, in the form of a market clearing condition between supply of and demand for capital. The rate of interest was then understood as the price to determine by this market. However, as is well known, the conception of capital as a factor of production—and of the rate of interest as the price for its use—did not work and involved several problems, some of which are discussed in this paper.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: stationary relative prices; capital; net accumulation; Wicksell; Walras
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B13 - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Stockholm School); B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B21 - Microeconomics; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D51 - Exchange and Production Economies; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving

References

Bliss, C. J. 1975. Capital Theory and Distribution of Income. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland/Elsevier.

Bloise, G. and Reichlin, P. 2009. ‘An obtrusive remark on capital and comparative statics.’ Metroeconomica, 60(1), 54-76.

Dvoskin, A. and Fratini, S.M. 2016. ‘On the Samuelson–Etula Master Function and the capital controversy.’ The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23(6): 1032-1058.

Dvoskin, A and Lazzarini, A. 2013. ‘On Walras's concept of equilibrium.’ Review of Political Economy, 25(1), 117-138

Fratini, S. M. 2007. ‘Reswitching of techniques in an intertemporal equilibrium model with overlapping generations.’ Contributions to Political Economy, 26(1): 43-59.

Fratini, S.M. 2013a. ‘Real Wicksell effect, demand for capital and stability.’ Metroeconomica 64(2): 346-360.

Fratini, S. M. 2013b. ‘Malinvaud on Wicksell’s legacy to capital theory: Some critical remarks.’ In: Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, edited by E. S. Levrero, A. Palumbo and A. Stirati. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Garegnani, P. 1960. Il Capitale nelle Teorie della Distribuzione. Milano: Giuffré.

Garegnani, P. 1976. ‘On a change in the notion of equilibrium in recent work on value and distribution.’ In: Essays in Modern Capital Theory, edited by M. Brown, K. Sato and P. Zarembka. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Garegnani, P. 1990. ‘Quantity of capital.’ In: Capital Theory, edited by J. Eatwell, M. Millgate and P. Newman. London: Macmillan.

Garegnani, P. 2008. ‘On Walras's theory of capital (Provisional draft 1962).’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 30(1): 367-384.

Hahn, F.H. 1975. ‘Revival of political economy: the wrong issues and the wrong argument.’ Economic Record, 51(3): 360-364.

Hirshleifer, J. 1967. ‘A note on Böhm-Bawerk/Wicksell theory of interest.’ Review of Economic Studies, 34(2): 191-9.

Imperia, A., Maffeo, V. and Ravagnani, F. 2014. ‘Wicksell on Walras’s early treatment of capital and interest.’ Mimeo.

Kompas, T. 1992. Studies in the History of Long-Run Equilibrium Theory. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

Kurz, H.D. 2000. ‘Wicksell and the problem of the “missing” equation.’ History of Political Economy, 32(4): 765-88.

Kurz, H.D. and Salvadori, N. 2001. ‘The aggregate neoclassical theory of distribution and the concept of a given value of capital: A reply.’ Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 12(4): 479-485.

Malinvaud, E. 1953. ‘Capital accumulation and efficient allocation of resources.’ Econometrica, 21(2): 233-268.

Malinvaud, E. 2003. ‘The legacy of Knut Wicksell to capital theory.’ Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105: 507-25.

Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of Political Economy, 8th ed. London: Macmillan.

Napoleoni, C. 1965. L’Equilibrio Economico Generale. Torino: Boringhieri.

Negishi, T. 1982. ‘Wicksell’s missing equation and Bohm-Bawerk’s three causes of interest in a stationary state.’ Zeitschrift für Nationalokonomie, 42: 161-74.

Petri, F. 1999. ‘Professor Hahn on the “neo-Ricardian” criticism of neoclassical economics.’ In: Value, Distribution and Capital, edited by G. Mongiovi and F. Petri. London: Routledge.

Petri, F. 2016. ‘Walras on capital: Interpretative insights from a review by Bortkiewicz.’ Contributions to Political Economy, 35 (1): 23-38.

Potestio, P. 1999. ‘The aggregate neoclassical theory of distribution and the concept of a given value of capital: Toward a more general critique.’ Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 10(3–4): 381-394.

Rader, T. 1989. ‘Production as indirect exchange.’ In: General equilibrium, edited by J. Eatwell, M. Millgate and P. Newman. London: Macmillan.

Samuelson, L. 1982. ‘On Wicksell’s missing equation.’ History of Political Economy, 14(3): 301–7.

Samuelson, P.A. 1966. ‘A summing up.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(4), 568-583.

Sandelin, B. 1980 ‘Wicksell’s missing equation, the production function, and the Wicksell effect.’ History of Political Economy, 12(1): 29–40.

Trabucchi, P. 2011. ‘Capital as a single magnitude and the orthodox theory of distribution in some writings of the early 1930s.’ Review of Political Economy, 23: 169-88.

Walras, L. 1977 [1926]. Elements of Pure Economics or the Theory of Social Wealth, translated by W. Jaffé. New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers.

Wicksell, K. 1967 [1901]. Lectures on Political Economy, vol. I. New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers.