Armand, Alex and Mendi, Pedro (2017): Demand Fluctuations and Innovation Investments: Evidence from the Great Recession in Spain.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_76884.pdf Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Fluctuations in aggregate demand can influence the decision to invest in innovation. This paper focuses on this choice when fluctuations are heterogeneous across productive strata of the economy. To guide the empirical analysis, we model firms’ decision to invest in innovation. In our framework, firms are heterogeneous and demand shocks are exogenous. We show that drops in aggregate expenditure reduce the proportion of firms investing in innovation. We then study investment behaviour in a panel of Spanish innovative manufacturing firms. These firms are all investing in internal R&D in 2004 and are yearly surveyed until 2013. During the Great Recession, firms experienced large contractions in aggregate consumption. The reduction reached 10% of its pre-crisis trend. We proxy heterogeneous fluctuations in demand with entry and exit rates in the productive stratum of each firm. Rates incorporate all firms, including non-innovative firms. Higher exit rates are associated with reductions of 2 to 3% in the share of firms investing in innovation. The drop is larger for smaller firms, which also experience larger decreases in sales. These results are in line with our theoretical predictions. Our estimates are robust to the inclusion of indicators of time-varying credit constraints. For these constraints, we observe a marginal role among innovative firms.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Demand Fluctuations and Innovation Investments: Evidence from the Great Recession in Spain |
English Title: | Demand Fluctuations and Innovation Investments: Evidence from the Great Recession in Spain |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | R&D, Innovation, Firm entry, Firm exit, Great Recession. |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D |
Item ID: | 76884 |
Depositing User: | Dr Alex Armand |
Date Deposited: | 18 Feb 2017 11:21 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 00:41 |
References: | Abbring, J. H. and J. R. Campbell (2010). Last-in first-out oligopoly dynamics. Economet- rica 78(5), 1491 – 1527. Aghion, P., P. Askenazy, N. Berman, G. Cette, and L. Eymard (2012). Credit constraints and the cyclicality of r&d investment: Evidence from france. Journal of the European Economic Association 10(5), 1001–1024. Archibugi, D., A. Filippetti, and M. Frenz (2013). Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation? Research Policy 42(2), 303–314. Argyres, N. and B. Silverman (2004). R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 25(8-9), 929–958. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, NBER Chapters, pp. 609–626. Arvanitis, S. and M. Woerter (2014). Firm characteristics and the cyclicality of R&D investments. Industrial & Corporate Change 23(5), 1141 – 1169. Ballot, G., F. Fakhfakh, F. Galia, and A. Salter (2015). The fateful triangle: Complementarities in performance between product, process and organizational innovation in France and the UK. Research Policy 44(1), 217–232. Barlevy, G. (2007). On the cyclicality of research and development. American Economic Re- view 97(4), 1131 – 1164. Bentolila, S., P. Cahuc, J. J. Dolado, and T. Le Barbanchon (2012). Two-tier labour markets in the great recession: France versus spain. The Economic Journal 122(562), F155–F187. Bustos, P. (2011). Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: Evidence on the impact of mercosur on argentinian firms. American Economic Review 101(1), 304–40. Cassiman, B. and R. Veugelers (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review 92(4), 1169–1184. Cassiman, B. and R. Veugelers (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 52(1), 68–82. Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal (1990). Absorptive-capacity - a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1), 128–152. Dixit, A. K. and J. E. Stiglitz (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review 67(3), 297 – 308. Dunne, T., M. Roberts, and L. Samuelson (1988). Patterns of firm entry and exit in united-states manufacturing-industries. Rand Journal of Economics 19(4), 495–515. García-Macia, D. (2016). The financing of ideas and the great deviation. Garicano, L. and C. Steinwender (2016). Survive Another Day: Using Changes in the Composition of Investments to Measure the Cost of Credit Constraints. Review of Economics and Statistics Forthcoming. Guadalupe, M., O. Kuzmina, and C. Thomas (2012). Innovation and foreign ownership. American Economic Review 102(7), 3594 – 3627. Hallak, J. C. and J. Sivadasan (2013). Product and process productivity: Implications for quality choice and conditional exporter premia. Journal of International Economics 91(1), 53 – 67. Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo (1996). The dynamics and evolution of industries. Industrial & Corporate Change 5(1), 51 – 87. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71(6), 1695 – 1725. Min, O. (2011). On the cyclicality of R&D. Review of Economics & Statistics 93(2), 542 – 553. 3 Mohnen, P. and L. Roller (2005). Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review 49(6), 1431–1450. Pindyck, R. (1991). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. Journal of Economic Literature 29(3), 1110–1148. Sadowski, B. and G. Sadowski-Rasters (2006). On the innovativeness of foreign affiliates: Evidence from companies in The Netherlands. Research Policy 35(3), 447–462. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Row, New York. van Beers, C., E. Berghall, and T. Poot (2008). R&D internationalization, R&D collaboration and public knowledge institutions in small economies: Evidence from Finland and the Netherlands. Research Policy 37(2), 294–308. Vives, X. (2008). “Innovation and Competitive Pressure”. Journal of Industrial Economics 56(3), 419 – 469. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press. 5 Yeaple, S. R. (2005). A simple model of firm heterogeneity, international trade, and wages. Journal of international Economics 65(1), 1–20. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/76884 |