Muinelo-Gallo, Leonel and Rodriguez-Miranda, Adrián and Castro-Scavone, Pablo (2017): Intergovernmental transfers and regional income inequalities in Uruguay.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_76983.pdf Download (529kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper we explore the bidirectional relationship between intergovernmental transfers and regional income inequalities in Uruguay. Based on the construction of a simultaneous equations model, that accounts for the joint determination of these two variables, and by using a panel of departments (regions) over the period 1990-2012, our empirical results show that the central government transfers to regional governments does not have a significant impact on regional income inequalities levels. In fact, these transfers are strongly determined by the historical validation of public expenditure executed by regional governments but not by regional income disparities levels. Our results are consistent with the lack of territorial cohesion criteria in the normative governing the allocation of these transfers in Uruguay. Finally, these results have clear policy implications based on the necessary revision of the normative scheme of intergovernmental regional transfers in Uruguay if the objective is to arrive to a country with a higher degree of territorial cohesion.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Intergovernmental transfers and regional income inequalities in Uruguay |
English Title: | Intergovernmental transfers and regional income inequalities in Uruguay |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | intergovernmental transfers, regional inequalities, panel data, simultaneous equations, Uruguay |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C33 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes |
Item ID: | 76983 |
Depositing User: | Sr Leonel Muinelo_Gallo |
Date Deposited: | 22 Feb 2017 17:20 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 22:33 |
References: | Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J., 2005. Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. In: Aghion P, Durlauf, S (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Elsevier, Amsterdam, North Holland, 385-472. Alm, J., Boex, J., 2002. An Overview of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Subnational Public Finance in Nigeria. ISP Working Paper Number 02-1. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. Alm J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., 2015. Re-designing equalization transfers: an application to south africa´s provincial equitable share. Journal of Developing Areas., Vol. 49 Issue 1, 1-22. Amarante, V., Colafranceschi M., Vigorito A., 2011. Uruguay’s income inequality under right and left regimens over 1981 – 2010. Working Paper 94/11. WIDER. Arocena, J., 2008. Los desafíos de la descentralización y la participación ciudadana en el Uruguay, en Cuadernos para el Desarrollo Local. Diálogos por la Descentralización, Año 1, Nº1, pág. 17-34, PNUD, Programa ART Uruguay. Atlas, C.M., Gilligan, T., Hendershott R., Zupan M., 1995. Slicing the Federal Government Net Spending Pie: Who Wins, Loses, and Why American Economic Review 85(3), 624-629. Avery, R., 1977. Error components and seemingly unrelated regressions. Econometrica 45, 199-209. Bahl, R., 1999. Implementation Rules for Fiscal Decentralization. ISP Working Paper Number 99-01. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. Baltagi, B., 1981. Simultaneous equations with error components. Journal of Econometrics 17, 189-200. Baltagi, B., 2008. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, fourth ed. Wiley and Sons, Chichester. Bardhan, P., 2002. Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (4), 185–205. Bardhan P, Mookherjee, D., 2000. Capture and governance at local and national levels. American Economic Review 90(2), 135-139. Barro, R., 2000. Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth 5(1), 5-32. Barrenechea, P., Troncoso, C., 2008. El índice de competitividad regional. ¿Qué cambios tuvo la competitividad por departamentos en una década?, Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, Programa de Desarrollo Local ART Uruguay. Betson, D., Haveman, R., 1984. The Role of Income Transfers in Reducing Inequality between and within Regions. Chapter in NBER book Economic Transfers in the United States. Marilyn Moon editor, 283-326. BID, 2007. Aportes para el Desarrollo del Sistema Financiero Municipal: El Papel de los Ingresos Propios Municipales. Estudio para los países del Cono Sur. País: Uruguay. Estudio preparado por: Daniel Sureda, Consultor - Coordinador del Proyecto: Huáscar Eguino. BID, 2009. Finanzas y gestión de los gobiernos subn-acionales en Uruguay. Nota Técnica UR-N1029 Responsable: Huáscar Eguino (FMM) Consultor: Juan Carlos Aguilar. Bjorn, E., Krishnakumar, J., 2008. Measurement errors and simultaneity, in: Mátyás, L., Sevestre, P. (Eds.), The Econometrics of Panel Data. Fundamentals and Recent Developments in Theory and Practice, Chapter 10, 323-367. Boex, J., 2003. The incidence of local government allocations in Tanzania, Public Administration and Development, 23(5). Brodjonegoro, B., Martinez-Vazquez, J., 2004. An Analysis of Indonesia's Transfer System: Recent Performance and Future Prospects. in Can Decentralization Help Rebuild Indonesia? Eds. J. Alm, J. Martinez-Vazquez and Sri Muliani Indrawati. Edgar Elgar. Boex, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., 2005. The Determinants of the Incidence of Intergovernmental Grants: A Survey of the International Experience. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University Research Paper Series Working Paper 06-52. March. Böhme, K., 2009. The EU Territorial Agenda and its Action Programme: how to reinforce the performance. Stockholm: Sweco Eurofutures. Böhme K., Doucet, P., Komornicki, T., Zaucha, J., Światek, D., 2011. How to strengthen the territorial dimension of Europe 2020 and the EU Cohesion Policy (Report based on the Territorial Agenda 2020, prepared at the request of the Polish Presidency of the Council of the European Union). Brennan G., Buchanan, J., 1980. The power to tax. Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Breton A., 1996. Competitive governments. An economic theory of politics and public finance. Cambridge University Press, New York. Brollo F., Nannicini, T., 2012. Tying Your Enemy's Hands in Close Races: The Politics of Federal Transfers in Brazil. American Political Science Review, 106, 742-761. Brosio, G., Jiménez, J., 2012. Introduction: approaching recent transform ations of intergovernm ental relations from multiple profiles in Decentralization and Reform in Latin America Improving Intergovernmental Relations. Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA. Buchanan, J., 1950. Federalism and fiscal equity. American Economic Review 40, 124–138. Cameron, A., Trivedi, P., 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. Cameron, A., Trivedi, P., 2010. Microeconometrics Using Stata. Rev. ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press. CEDES, 2010. Diseño institucional y descentralización territorial en un país unitario y centralizado como Uruguay. Informe Final. Agenda Nacional de Descentralización, Uruguay Integra, OPP. Cowell, F., 2000. Measurement of Inequality in Handbook of Income Distribution, edited by A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon. Elsevier: Amsterdam. Cox, G., McCubbins, M., 1986. Electoral politics as a redistributive game. The Journal of Politics 48, 370–389. Curto-Grau, M., Solé-Ollé, A., Sorribas-Navarro, P., 2012. Partisan targeting of inter-governmental transfers and state interference in local elections: evidence of Spain. Documents de Treball de l’IEB 2012/31. Dahlby, B., Wilson, L., 1994. Fiscal capacity, tax effort, and optimal equalization grants. Canadian Journal of Economics 337, 657–672. Dasgupta S., Dhillon, A., Dutta, B., 2004. Electoral Goals and Centre-State Transfers in India. University of Warwick Working Paper. Davidson R., MacKinnon, J., 2004. Econometric Theory and Methods. New York: Oxford University Press. Díaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B., Estévez, F., 2007. Credit Claiming and Vote Buying? The Electoral Effects of Poverty Relief Programs in Mexico, Stanford University, mimeo. Dixit, A., Londregan, J., 1998. Fiscal federalism and redistributive politics. Journal of Public Economics 68, 153–180. Ezcurra R., Pascual, P., 2008. Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: Evidence from several European Union countries. Environment and Planning A 40, pp. 1185-1201. Ezcurra R., Rodríguez-Pose, A., 2014. Government quality and spatial inequality: A cross-country analysis. Environment and Planning A 46(7), 1732-1753. Greene, W., 2012. Econometric Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Grossman, P., 1994. A political theory of intergovernmental grants. Public Choice 78, 295–303. Hayashi, F., 2000. Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Keen M., Marchand, M., 1997. Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending. Journal of Public Economics 66, 33–53. Khemani, S., 2003. Partisan Politics and Intergovernmental Transfers in India. Working Paper, vol. 3016. Development Research Group, The World Bank. Kmenta, J., 1997. Elements of Econometrics. Second Edition Annual Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Kyriacou A., Muinelo-Gallo L., Roca-Sagalés, O., 2015. Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: The importance of good governance. Papers in Regional Science 94 (1), 89 -107. Lessmann C., 2009. Fiscal decentralization and regional disparity: Evidence from cross section and panel data. Environment and Planning A 41, 2455-2473. Lessmann C., 2012. Regional inequality and decentralization: an empirical analysis. Environment and Plannning A 44, 1363-1388. Levitt, S., Snyder, J., 1995. Political parties and the distribution of federal outlays. American Journal of Political Science 39, 958–980. Limoneiro D., 2015. Beyond income transfers: The decline of regional inequality in Brazil during the 2000s. Progress in Development Studies. Jan2015, Vol. 15 Issue 1, 6-21. Lindbeck, A., Weibull, J., 1987. Balanced budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition. Public Choice 52, 273–297. Martinez-Vazquez J., Mac Nab, R., 2003. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth, World Development, Vol. 39(9), 1597-1661. Martinez-Vazquez, J., Sepulveda, C., 2011. Intergovernmental Transfers in Latin America: A Policy Reform Perspective, International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1108, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. Martinez-Vazquez, J., Sepulveda, C., 2012. Toward a more general Intergovernmental transfers: a policy reform perspective 289 theory of revenue assignments, Working Paper, International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA. Matyas, L., 1999. Generalized Method of Moments Estimation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McKinnon, R., 1997. Market-preserving fiscal federalism in the American monetary union, in Blejer M. and Ter-Minassian T. (eds) Macroeconomic dimensions of public finance: Essays in honour of Vito Tanzi, pp. 73-93. Routledge, London. Muinelo-Gallo, L., Rodríguez-Miranda, A., 2014. Descentralización fiscal, calidad de gestión de gobierno y disparidades regionales en Uruguay", Estudios de Economía, Vol.41, Nº2, 219-250. Musgrave, R., 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. McGraw-Hill, New York. Oates, W., 1972. Fiscal Federalism, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Oates W., 1993. Fiscal decentralization and economic development. National Tax Journal 46(2), 237-243. Oates W., 1999. An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal Economic Literature 37, 1120-1149. Porto, A., Sanguinetti, P., 2001. Political Determinants of Intergovernmental Grants: Evidence from Argentina. Economics and Politics 13(3), 237-256. Prud’homme, R., 1995. On the dangers of decentralization. World Bank Research Observer 10(2), 201-220. Qian, Y., Weingast, B., 1997. Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11, 83-92. Raimondo, H., 1983. The Political Economy of State Intergovernmental Grants. Growth and Change 14, 17-23. Rodríguez-Miranda, A., 2006. Desarrollo Económico Territorial Endógeno. Teoría y aplicación al caso uruguayo, Serie Documentos de Trabajo, DT 2/06, Instituto de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administración, Universidad de la República. Rodríguez-Miranda, A., 2014. Desarrollo económico y disparidades territoriales en Uruguay. Cuadernos sobre Desarrollo Humano Nº 3, PNUD Uruguay. Rodríguez-Pose, A., 2010. Do institutions matter for regional development in the EU? Imdea Working Paper series in Economics and Social Sciences 2010/2, Madrid. Rodríguez-Pose A., Ezcurra, R., 2010. Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Economic Geography 10, 619-644. Rodrik D, Subramanian, F., Trebbi, F., 2004. Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth 9, 131-65. Sacchi A., Salotti, S., 2014. How regional inequality affects fiscal decentralisation: accounting for the autonomy of subcentral governments. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32(1), 144 – 162. Salmon P., 1987. Decentralization as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 3(2), 24-43. Sollé-Ollé, A., Sorribas-Navarro, P., 2008. The effects of partisan alignment on the allocation of intergovernmental transfers. Differences-in-differences estimates for Spain. Journal of Public Economics 92 812), 2302–2319. Tabellini, G., 2010. Culture and institutions: Economic development in the regions of Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association 8(4), 677-716. Theil, H., 1971. Principles of Econometrics. New York: Wiley. Weingast B., 1995. The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11, 1-31. Williamson, J., 1965. Regional inequality and the process of national development: A description of patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change 13, 3-45. Wooldridge, J., 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Second Edition. MIT Press. Worthington, A., Dollery, B., 1998. The political determination of intergovernmental grants in Australia. Public Choice 94, 299–315. Zellner, A., Theil, H., 1962. Three-stage least squares: simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations”. Econometrica 30(1), 54–78. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/76983 |