Roy, Nilanjan (2017): Action revision, information and collusion in an experimental duopoly market.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_77033.pdf Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
We report on an experiment designed to study a dynamic model of quantity competition where firms continuously revise their production targets prior to the play of the "one-shot" game. We investigate how the observability of rival firm's plans and the technology for implementation of revised actions affect market competitiveness. Under a real-time revision game where payoffs are determined only by the quantities prepared at the end, play converges to the Cournot-Nash output when rival's plans are unobservable. If plans cannot be hidden from competitors, choices are even more competitive than the static Nash equilibrium, thereby showing a negative value of information with lower profits. With stochastic revision, where opportunities to revise arrive according to a Poisson process and the quantities selected at the last opportunity are implemented, collusion is much frequent. This shows, more generally, that cooperation can be observed even when individuals interact only once.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Action revision, information and collusion in an experimental duopoly market |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Cournot duopoly, real-time revision, stochastic revision, experiment, information, imitation, best response |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D22 - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets |
Item ID: | 77033 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Nilanjan Roy |
Date Deposited: | 23 Feb 2017 14:32 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 01:16 |
References: | Argenton, C. and Muller, W. (2012), "Collusion in experimental Bertrand duopolies with convex costs: the role of cost asymmetry," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30, 508-517. Balliet, D. (2010), "Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analytic review," Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54, 39-57. Biais, B., Hillion, P. and Spatt, C. (1999), "Price discovery and learning during the preopening period in the Paris Bourse," Journal of Political Economy, 107, 1218-1248. Biais, B., Bisiere, C. and Pouget, S. (2014), "Equilibrium discovery and preopening mechanisms in an experimental market," Management Science, 60(3), 753-769. Brown-Kruse, J., Cronshaw, M. B., and Schenk, D. J. (1993), "Theory and experiments on spatial competition," Economic Inquiry, 31, 139-165. Calcagno, R. and Lovo, S. (2010), "Preopening and equilibrium selection," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 10-023/2, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1557137. Calcagno, R., Kamada, Y., Lovo, S. and Sugaya, T. (2014), "Asynchronicity and coordination in common and opposing interest games," Theoretical Economics, 9, 409-434. Cao, C., Ghysels, E. and Hatheway, F. (2000), "Price discovery without trading: evidence from the Nasdaq preopening," Journal of Finance, 55, 1339-1365. Caruana, G. and Einav, L. (2008), "Production targets," Rand Journal of Economics, 39(4), 990-1017. Cooper, D. J. and Kuhn, K.-U. (2014), "Communication, renegotiation, and the scope for collusion," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(2), 247-278. Daughety, A. F. and Forsythe, R. (1987a), "The effects of industry-wide price regulation on industrial organization," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 397-434. Daughety, A. F. and Forsythe, R. (1987b), "Industry-wide regulation and the formation of reputations: a laboratory analysis," In Bailey, E. E., editor, Public Regulation: New perspectives on Institutions and Policies, pages 347-398. MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Deck, C. and Nikiforakis, N. (2012), "Perfect and imperfect real-time monitoring in a minimum effort game," Experimental Economics, 15(1), 71-88. Dorsey, R. E. (1992), "The voluntary contributions mechanism with real time revisions," Public Choice, 73, 261-282. Doyle, P. and Snyder, C. (1999), "Information sharing and competition in the motor vehicle industry," Journal of Political Economy, 107, 1326-1364. Duffy, J. and Feltovich, N. (2002), "Do actions speak louder than words? an experimental comparison of observation and cheap talk," Games and Economic Behavior, 39(1), 1-27. Duffy, J., Ochs, J., and Vesterlund, L. (2007), "Giving little by little: dynamic voluntary contribution games," Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1708-1730. Einy, E., Moreno, D. and Shitovitz, B. (2002), "Information advantage in Cournot oligopoly," Journal of Economic Theory, 106, 151-160. Fonseca, M. A., Huck, S. and Normann, H-T. (2005), "Playing Cournot although they shouldn't: endogenous timing in experimental duopolies with asymmetric costs," Economic Theory, 25, 669-677. Fonseca, M. A., and Normann, H-T. (2012), "Explicit vs. tacit collusion- the impact of communication in oligopoly experiments," European Economic Review, 56, 1759-1772. Fouraker, L. and Siegel, S. (1963), Bargaining Behavior, McGraw-Hill, New York. Fried, D. (1984), "Incentives for information production and disclosure in duopolistic environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99, 367-381. Friedman, J. W. (1967), "An experimental study of cooperative duopoly," Econometrica, 35, 379-397. Gal-Or, E. (1985), "Information sharing in oligopoly," Econometrica, 53, 329-343. Gal-Or, E. (1987), "First mover disadvantages with private information," Review of Economic Studies, 54, 279-292. Gal-Or, E. (1988), "The advantages of impreciser information," Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 266-275. Goren, H., Kurzban, R. and Rapoport, A. (2003), "Social loafing vs. social enhancement: public goods provisioning in real-time with irrevocable commitments," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 277-290. Goren, H., Kurzban, R. and Rapoport, A. (2004), "Revocable commitments to public goods provision under the real-time protocol of play," Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 17-37. Holt, C. A. (1985), "An experimental test of the consistent-conjectures hypothesis," American Economic Review, 75, 314-325. Holt, C. A. (1995), "Industrial organization: a survey of laboratory research," in Kagel, J., Roth, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 349-443. Huck, S., Normann, H-T. and Oechssler, J. (1999), "Learning in Cournot oligopoly- an experiment," The Economic Journal, 109, C80-C95. Huck, S., Muller, W. and Normann, H-T. (2001), "Stackelberg beats Cournot: on collusion and efficiency in experimental markets," The Economic Journal, 111, 749-765. Huck, S., Muller, W. and Normann, H-T. (2002), "To commit or not to commit: endogenous timing in experimental duopoly markets," Games and Economic Behavior, 38(2), 240-264. Huck, S., Normann, H-T. and Oechssler, J. (2004), "Two are few and four are many: number effects in experimental oligopolies," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 53(4), 435-446. Kamada, Y. and Kandori, M. (2015), "Revision games," Working Paper. Kurzban, R., McCabe, K., Smith, V. L. and Wilson, B. J. (2001), "Incremental commitment and reciprocity in a real-time public goods game," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(12), 1662-1673. Mason, C. F., Phillips, O. R. and Nowell, C. (1992), "Duopoly behavior in asymmetric markets: an experimental evaluation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 662-670. Mason, C. F. and Phillips, O. R. (1997), "Information and cost asymmetry in experimental duopoly markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 290-299. Myatt, D. P. and Wallace, C. (2015), "Cournot competition and the social value of information," Journal of Economic Theory, 158(B), 466-506. Palfrey, T. R., Rosenthal, H. and Roy, N. (2015), "How cheap talk enhances efficiency in threshold public goods games," Games and Economic Behavior, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2015.10.004. Potters, J. and Suetens, S. (2013), "Oligopoly experiments in the current millennium," Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(3), 439-460. Raith, M. (1996), "A general model of information sharing in oligopoly," Journal of Economic Theory, 71, 260-288. Sakai, Y. (1985), "The value of information in a simple duopoly model," Journal of Economic Theory, 36, 36-54. Vives, X. (1995), "The speed of information revelation in a financial market mechanism," Journal of Economic Theory, 67, 178-204. Waichman, I., Requate, T., and Siang, C. K. (2014), "Communication in Cournot competition: an experimental study," Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 1-16. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/77033 |