Melguizo Lopez, Isabel (2017): Homophily and the persistence of disagreement.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_77367.pdf Download (499kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We study a dynamic model of attitude formation in which individuals average others' attitudes to develop their own. We assume that individuals exhibit homophily in sociodemographic exogenous attributes, that is, the attention they pay to each other is based on whether they possess similar attributes. We also assume that individuals exhibit homophily in attitudes, at the group level. Specifically, attributes that are salient, that is, that exhibit a substantial difference in attitudes between the groups of individuals possessing and lacking them, deserve high attention. Since we allow attention to evolve over time we prove that when there is, initially, a unique most salient attribute, it deserves growing attention overtime in detriment of the remaining ones. As a result, individuals eventually interact only with others similar to them across this attribute and disagreement persists. It materializes in two groups of thinking defined according to this attribute.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Homophily and the persistence of disagreement |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | disagreement; homophily; average-based updating |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification |
Item ID: | 77367 |
Depositing User: | Isabel melguizo lópez |
Date Deposited: | 16 Mar 2017 14:44 |
Last Modified: | 01 Nov 2022 00:31 |
References: | Daron Acemoglu and Asuman Ozdaglar. Opinion dynamics and learning in social networks. Dynamic Games and Applications, 1(1):3-49, 2011. Daron Acemoglu, Asuman Ozdaglar, and Ali ParandehGheibi. Spread of (mis) information in social networks. Games and Economic Behavior, 70(2):194-227, 2010. Daron Acemoglu, Giacomo Como, Fabio Fagnani, and Asuman Ozdaglar. Opinion fluctuations and disagreement in social networks. Mathematics of Operations Research, 38(1):1-27, 2013. Alberto Alesina and Guido Tabellini. A positive theory of fiscal deficits and government debt. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(3):403-414, 1990. James Andreoni and Tymothy Mylovanov. Diverging opinions. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, pages 209-232, 2012. Abhijit Banerjee and Drew Fudenberg. Word-of-mouth learning. Games and Economic Behavior, 46(1):1-22), 2004. Marianne Bertrand. New perspectives on gender. Handbook of labor economics, 4: 1543-1590), 2011. Pedro Bordalo, Nicola Gennaioli, and Andrei Shleifer. Salience and consumer choice. Journal of Political Economy, 121(5):803-843, 2013. Jordi Brandts, Ayfca Ebru Giritligil, and Roberto A. Weber. An experimental study of persuasion bias and social influence in networks. Technical report, BELIS, Istanbul Bilgi University, 2014. Tiago VV Cavalcanti, Chryssi Giannitsarou, and Charles R Johnson. Network cohesion. Economic Theory, pages 1-21, 2012. Arun Chandrasekhar, Horacio Larreguy, and Juan Pablo Xandri. Testing models of social learning on networks: Evidence from a framed field experiment. Work.Pap., Mass. Inst. Technol., Cambridge, MA, 2012. Samprit Chatterjee and Eugene Seneta. Towards consensus: some convergence theorems on repeated averaging. Journal of Applied Probability, pages 89-97, 1977. Hsiao-Chi Chen, James W. Friedman, and Jacques-Francois Thisse. Boundedly rational nash equilibrium: a probabilistic choice approach. Games and Economic Behavior, 18(1):32-54, 1997. Andrew E. Clark. Job satisfaction and gender: why are women so happy at work? Labour economics, 4(4):341-372, 1997. Luca Corazzini, Filippo Pavesi, Beatrice Petrovich, and Luca Stanca. Influential listeners: An experiment on persuasion bias in social networks. European Economic Review, 56(6):1276-1288, 2012. Morris H. DeGroot. Reaching a consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69(345):118-121, 1974. Peter M. DeMarzo, Jeffrey Zwiebel, and Dimitri Vayanos. Persuasion bias, social influence, and unidimensional opinions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (3):909-968, 2003. Federico Echenique and Roland G. Fryer. A measure of segregation based on social interactions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2):441-485, 2007. Glenn Ellison and Drew Fudenberg. Rules of thumb for social learning. Journal of political Economy, 101(4):612-643, 1993. Noah E. Friedkin and Eugene C. Johnsen. Social influence networks and opinion change. Advances in group processes, 16(1):1-29, 1999. Douglas Gale and Shachar Kariv. Bayesian learning in social networks. Games and Economic Behavior, 45(2):329-346, 2003. Benjamin Golub and Matthew O. Jackson. Naive learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2:112-149, 2010. Benjamin Golub and Matthew O. Jackson. How homophily affects the speed of learning and best-response dynamics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127 (3):1287-1338, 2012. Veronika Grimm and Friederike Mengel. An experiment on belief formation in networks. Available at SSRN 2361007, 2014. Rainer Hegselmann and Ulrich Krause. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(3), 2002. Ilse C. F. Ipsen and Teresa M. Selee. Ergodicity coefficients defined by vector norms. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 32(1):153-200, 2011. Matthew O. Jackson. Social and economic networks. Princeton University Press, 2008. Gueorgi Kossinets and Duncan J. Watts. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science, 311(5757):88-90, 2006. Botond Koszegi and Adam Szeidl. A model of focusing in economic choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1):53-104, 2013. Ulrich Krause. A discrete nonlinear and non-autonomous model of consensus formation. Communications in difference equations, pages 227-236, 2000. William J McGuire, Claire V McGuire, Pamela Child, and Terry Fujioka. Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 36(5):511, 1978. Carl D. Meyer. Matrix analysis and applied linear algebra. SIAM, 2000. Keith T. Poole and R. Steven Daniels. Ideology, party, and voting in the US congress, 1959-1980. American Political Science Review, 79(2):373-399, 1985. Milton E. Rosenbaum. The repulsion hypothesis: On the non-development of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6):1156, 1986. Thomas C. Schelling. Models of segregation. The American Economic Review, 59(2):488-493, 1969. Ramadhar Singh and Soo Yan Ho. Attitudes and attraction: A new test of the attraction, repulsion and similarity-dissimilarity asymmetry hypotheses. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2):197-211, 2000. Lones Smith and Peter Sorensen. Pathological outcomes of observational learning. Econometrica, 68(2):371-398, 2000. John Stachurski. Economic dynamics: theory and computation. MIT Press, 2009. Daniel W. Stroock. Probability theory: an analytic view. Cambridge university press, 2010. Irina Suanet and Fons J.R. Van de Vijver. Perceived cultural distance and acculturation among exchange students in russia. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(3):182-197, 2009. Zannie Giraud Voss, Daniel M. Cable, and Glenn B. Voss. Organizational identity and performance: What happens when leaders disagree about who we are? Organization Science, 17(6):741-755, 2006. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/77367 |