How do firm characteristics affect behavioural additionalities of public R&D subsidies? Evidence for the Austrian transport sector

Wanzenböck, Iris and Scherngell, Thomas and Fischer, Manfred M. (2013): How do firm characteristics affect behavioural additionalities of public R&D subsidies? Evidence for the Austrian transport sector. Published in: Technovation , Vol. 33, No. 2-3 (2013): pp. 66-77.

Abstract

Interest of STI policies to influence the innovation behaviour of firms has been increased considerably. This gives rise to the notion of behavioural additionality, broadening traditional evaluation concepts of input and output additionality. Though there is empirical work measuring behavioural additionalities, we know little about what role distinct firm characteristics play for their occurrence. The objective is to estimate how distinct firm characteristics influence the realisation of behavioural additionalities. We use survey data on 155 firms, considering the behavioural additionalities stimulated by the Austrian R&D funding scheme in the field of intelligent transport systems in 2006. We focus on three different forms of behavioural additionality – project additionality, scale additionality and cooperation additionality – and employ binary regression models to address this question. Results indicate that R&D related firm characteristics significantly affect the realisation of behavioural additionality. Firms with a high level of R&D resources are less likely to substantiate behavioural additionalities, while small, young and technologically specialised firms more likely realise behavioural additionalities. From a policy perspective, this indicates that direct R&D promotion of firms with high R&D resources may be misallocated, while attention of public support should be shifted to smaller, technologically specialised firms with lower R&D experience.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Behavioural additionality, public R&D subsidies, STI policy evaluation
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C25 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions ; Probabilities; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

References

Arrow KJ (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson RR (ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pp. 09-625. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

Autio E, Gustafsson R and Kanninen S (2008) First- and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs. Research Policy 37(1), 59-76

Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1), 99-120 Breschi S, Lissoni F and Malerba F (2003) Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy 32(1), 69-87

Buisseret TJ, Cameron HM and Georghiou L (1995) What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management 10, 587-600

Clarysse B, Wright M and Mustar P (2009) Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective. Research Policy 38(10), 1517-1533

Clarysee B, Bilsen V and Steurs G (2006) Behavioural additionality of the R&D subsidies Programme of IWTFlanders (Belgium). In: OECD (ed.) Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour – Measuring Behavioural Additionality, pp. 91-114. OECD, Paris Cohen WM (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In: Hall BH and Rosenberg N (eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Volume 1, pp. 129-213. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam

Cohen WM and Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1), 128-152

David PA, Hall BH and Toole AA (2000) Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29(4), 497-529

Edquist C (2005) Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC and Nelson RR (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 181-208. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Falk R (2007) Measuring the effect of public support schemes on firms' innovation activities - survey evidence from Austria. Research Policy 36, 665-679

Fischer MM (2001) Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of Innovation. The Annals of Regional Sciencem 35(2), 199-216

Galende J and De la Fuente JM (2003) Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour. Research Policy 32(5), 715-736

Garcia-Vega M (2006) Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy 35(2), 230-246

Georghiou L (2002) Impact and additionality of innovation policy. In: Boekelt P (ed.) Innovation policy and sustainable development: Can public innovation incentives make a difference? pp. 57-65. IWT Studies 40, IWT-Observatory, Brussels

Georghiou L and Clarysee B (2006) Evaluation government financing of business R&D: Measuring behavioural additionality - introduction and synthesis. In: OECD (ed.) Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour – Measuring Behavioural Additionality, pp. 9-38. OECD, Paris

Geyer A (2006) Interimsevaluierung Strategieprogramm intelligente Verkehrssysteme und Services (IV2S). Endbericht. Technopolis, Wien

Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis. 5th edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

Hsu FM (2009) The effect of government-sponsored R&D programmes on additionality in recipient firms in Taiwan. Technovation 29(3), 204-217

Klette T, Moen J and Griliches Z (2000) Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failure? Research Policy 29, 471–496

Jenks GF (1967) The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography 7, 186-190

Larosse J (2004) Conceptual and empirical challenges of evaluating the effectiveness of innovation policies with behavioural additionality. In: Georghiou L, Clarysee B, Steurs B, Bilsen V and Larosse J (eds.) 'Making the difference'. The evaluation of 'behavioural additionality' of R&D subsidies, Chapter 3, pp. 57-69. IWTStudies 48, IWT Observatory, Brussels

Luukkonen T (2000) Additionality of EU framework programmes. Research Policy 29(6), 711-724 Luukkonen T (1998) The difficulties in assessing the impact of EU framework programmes. Research Policy 27, 599–610

Long JS and Freese J (2001) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 2nd edition, Stata Press, Texas

Nelson RR (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67(3), 297-306

OECD (ed.) (2006) Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality. OECD, Paris

Paier M and Scherngell T (2011) Determinants of collaboration in European R&D networks: Empirical evidence from a discrete choice model. Industry and Innovation 18(1), 89-104

Teece DJ (2010) Technological innovation and the theory of the firm: The role of enterprise-level knowledge, complementarities, and (dynamic) capabilities. In: Hall BH and Rosenberg N (eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Volume 1, pp. 679-730. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam

Teece DJ, Pisano G and Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 509-533