Lukovics, Miklós and Zuti, Bence (2014): Egyetemek a régiók versenyképességének javításáért: „negyedik generációs” egyetemek? Published in: Tér és Társadalom / Space and Society , Vol. 28, No. 4 (2014): pp. 77-96.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_77572.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Many successful examples prove that universities can have a significant role in the enhancement of their regions. Modern economic development demands that due to increased committment to the needs of society and economy, the main traditional activities of universities (education and research) should be broadened and diversified. To be able to optimally exploit their potential regarding regional economic development, the presence of an outstanding educational culture is necessary but not sufficient. It is also necessary to maintain high quality standards regarding research activities and to promote the utilisation of research results among local actors and the local economy (spin-offs). Beyond the well-known typology of the first, second and third generation of universities that describes the above mentioned processes, the concept of the “fourth generation” of universities emerged in international literature although it has not become a topic of general consensus of the scientific community yet. However, it describes interesting facts that are worth considering regarding the economic development effects of universities. We concluded that the most significant distinguishing characteristic is proactivity. Its purpose is to initiate and influence changes in local society and economy in accordance with the demands of a knowledge-based society. The logic of “fourth generation” universities goes beyond the logic of third generation of universities in that “fourth generation” universities would play a larger role in affecting the local area, i.e. they should be able to form their social and economic environment, instead of just answering to local needs. This approach involves the enhancement of strategic aspects and the spread of an innovative and flexible organisational culture. In the case of “fourth generation” universities, besides the education-research-knowledge utilisation triangle, the goal is to prepare for the conscious, planned, future-oriented development of a local economy. In this model, the university is the catalyst and one of the engines of the economy at the same time. It not only contributes to the education of professionals, scientists, entrepreneurs, but also to the formation of their environment. In the case of “fourth generation” universities, multilingual operations may be necessary due to cross-border cooperations and the presence of other network connections. A professional management will be responsible for strategic and operative activities, although local experts and professionals also have a significant role in these actions. This study aims to review and systematise the active and passive activities of universities that can enhance the competitiveness of any given region. We review the available ideas regarding the presence of “fourth generation” universities and we attempt to integrate these into a scholarly grounded framework of university generations. Furthermore we identify and examine the potential existence of success factors or “components” that may generally characterise internationally successful universities with a notable local economic impact.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Egyetemek a régiók versenyképességének javításáért: „negyedik generációs” egyetemek? |
English Title: | Universities enhancing regional competitiveness: “fourth generation” universities? |
Language: | Hungarian |
Keywords: | egyetem, gazdaságfejlesztés, rombuszmodell |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I20 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I25 - Education and Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General |
Item ID: | 77572 |
Depositing User: | Bence Zuti |
Date Deposited: | 20 Mar 2017 20:45 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 22:10 |
References: | Arbo, P., Benneworth, P. (2007): Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: A literature review. OECD, Paris (Education Working Paper; 9.) Bajmócy Z. (2006): Egyetemi üzleti inkubáció lehetőségei elmaradott térségekben. Tér és Társadalom, 3., 31–47. Bajmócy Z., Lukovics M., Vas Zs. (2009): A subregional analysis of universities’ contribution to economic and innovation performance. University of Košice, Košice Benneworth, P., Dawley, S. (2005): Managing the university third strand innovation process? Developing innovation support services in regionally engaged universities. Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, 3., 74–94. Benneworth, P., Sanderson, A. (2009): The regional engagement of universities: Building capacity in a sparse innovation environment. Higher Education Management and Policy, 1., 131–148. Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J. (2012): Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. Twenty-first-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. SpringerBriefs in Business, 7., 1–63. Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J. (2014): Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: arts, democracy, and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1. Carayannis, E. G., Rakhmatullin, R. (2014): The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2., 212–239. Chatterton, P., Goddard, J. (2000): The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education, 4., 475–496. Clark, B. R. (1998): Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Pergamon, Oxford Clark, B. R. (2001): The entrepreneurial university: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Higher Education and Management, 2., 9–24. EC (2013a): Responsible research and innovation (RRI), science and technology. European Commission, Brussels EC (2013b): Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. European Commission, Brussels Etzkowitz, H. (2002): The triple helix of university–industry–government. Implications for policy and evaluation. Science Policy Institute, Stockholm Etzkowitz, H. (2008): The triple helix: Industry, university, and government in innovation. Routledge. New York Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000): The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 2., 109–123. Eurostat (2014): GDP per capita in the EU in 2011: seven capital regions among the ten most prosperous. Eurostat, Brussels Florida, R. (1995): Toward the learning region. Futures, 5., 527–536. Gibb, A. A., Haskins, G., Robertson, I. (2013): Leading the entrepreneurial university: Meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education institutions. In: Altmann, A., Ebersberger, B. (eds.): Universities in change: managing higher education in the age of globalization. Springer, New York, 9–45. Goddard, J., Pukkaa, J (2008): The engagement of higher education institutions in regional development: An overview of the opportunities and challenges. Higher Education Management and Policy, 2., 11–41. Goldstein, H. A., Renault, C. S. (2004): Contributions of universities to regional economic development: A quasi-experimental approach, Regional Studies, 7., 733–746. Grosz A., Rechnitzer J. (szerk.) (2005): Régiók és nagyvárosok innovációs potenciálja Magyarországon. MTA RKK, Pécs, Győr Holbrook, J. A., Wolfe, D. A. (2002): Knowledge, clusters and regional innovation: Economic development in Canada. In: Holbrook, J. A., Wolfe, D. A. (eds.): Knowledge, clusters and learning regions. School of Policy Studies, Queen's University. Kingston Imreh-Tóth M., Lukovics M. (2014): Egyetemközpontú vállalkozásfejlesztés elmaradott térségben: negyedik generációs egyetemi funkciók? Marketing & Menedzsment, 2., 43–56. Kitagawa, F. (2005): Entrepreneurial universities and the development of regional societies: A spatial view of the Europe of knowledge. Higher Education Management and Policy, 3., 65–89. Lengyel B. (2004): Egyetem – gazdaság – kormányzat együttműködése: a Triple Helix modell a gya- korlatban. In: Lengyel I. (szerk.): A Szegedi Tudományegyetem lehetőségei a tudásalapú helyi gazda- ságfejlesztésben. Kutatási háttéranyagok V. kötet. K+F és egyetemek az Európai Unióban. Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Szeged, 1–31. Lengyel I. (2000a): A regionális versenyképességről. Közgazdasági Szemle, 12., 962–987. Lengyel I. (2000b): Porter-rombusz: a regionális gazdaságfejlesztési stratégiák alapmodellje. Tér és Társadalom, 4., 39–86. Lengyel I. (2003): Verseny és területi fejlődés: térségek versenyképessége Magyarországon. JATEPress, Szeged Lengyel I. (2004): Egyetemek szerepe a helyi gazdaságfejlesztésben. In: Lengyel I. (szerk.): A Szegedi Tudományegyetem lehetőségei a tudásalapú helyi gazdaságfejlesztésben. Kutatási háttéranyagok IV. kötet. Egyetemek szerepe a helyi gazdaság- és vállalkozásfejlesztésben. Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Szeged, 1–54. Lengyel I. (2008): „Távolság versus közelség” dilemma az ipari-egyetemi kapcsolatokon alapuló tu- dásalapú helyi gazdaságfejlesztésben. In: A gazdasági környezet és a vállalati stratégiák. A IX. Ipar- és Vállalatgazdasági Konferencia előadásai. Szeged, 551–562. Lukovics M. (2010): Az egyetemek lehetséges szerepe a régiók versenyképességének javításában. Kézirat. SZTE GTK, Szeged Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., Stilgoe, J. (2012): Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 6., 751–760. Pawlowski, K. (2009): The ‘fourth generation university’ as a creator of the local and regional development. Higher Education in Europe, 1., 51–64. Sutcliffe, H. (2013): A report on responsible research and innovation. Matter, London Vilmányi. M. (2011): Egyetemi-ipari együttműködések a kapcsolatmarketing nézőpontjából. Vezetés- tudomány, 1., 52–63. Von Schomberg, R. (2013): A vision for responsible research and innovation. In: Owen, R., Bessant, J., Heintz, M. (eds.): Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. John Wiley, Chichester Wissema, J. G. (2009): Towards the third generation university. Managing the university in transition. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., Knockaert, M. (2008): Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 8., 1205–1223. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/77572 |