Miller, Alan (2017): Corporate Voting.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79185.pdf Download (340kB) | Preview |
Abstract
I introduce a model of corporate voting. I characterize the shareholder majority rule as the unique corporate voting rule that satisfies four axioms: anonymity, neutrality, share monotonicity, and merger, a property that requires consistency in election outcomes following stock-for-stock mergers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Corporate Voting |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Corporate voting, axioms, shareholder majority rule, quotas rules, merger, one share-one vote |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K22 - Business and Securities Law |
Item ID: | 79185 |
Depositing User: | Alan Miller |
Date Deposited: | 18 May 2017 10:28 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 09:36 |
References: | Grossman, S. J. and O. D. Hart (1988): “One Share-One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 175–202. Harris, M. and A. Raviv (1988): “Corporate Governance: Voting Rights and Majority Rules,” Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 203–235. Hu, H. T. and B. Black (2006): “Empty voting and hidden (morphable) owner- ship: Taxonomy, implications, and reforms.” Business Lawyer, 61, 1011–1070. May, K. O. (1952): “A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision,” Econometrica, 20, 680–684. Moulin, H. (1980): “On strategy-proofness and single peakedness,” Public Choice, 35, 437–455. Posner, E. A. and E. G. Weyl (2014): “Quadratic Voting as Efficient Corporate Governance,” University of Chicago Law Review, 81, 251–272. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79185 |