Revisit Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: evidence from Malaysia (1960-2015)

Razak, Lutfi Abdul and Masih, Mansur (2017): Revisit Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: evidence from Malaysia (1960-2015).

Abstract

This paper revisits the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle – the mother of all puzzles – to uncover whether there exists a long-run relationship between domestic investment and domestic savings for the case of Malaysia. This is a long-standing empirical puzzle in macroeconomics which contradicts economic theory: for open economies, savings should be able to flow to where investment returns are most attractive, and hence there should be no correlation between investment and savings. One plausible reason put forth in the literature as an explanation for the puzzle is the reduction in trade frictions. As trade frictions are reduced, capital becomes more mobile, which in turn would mitigate the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Using an ARDL framework, we seek to investigate whether trade openness, as a proxy for reduced trade frictions, can help explain the long-run relationship between savings and investment. Although we discover mixed evidence with regards to the role of trade openness, we find that more importantly, the results tend to indicate the presence of possible structural break. Nevertheless, the results from our paper imply that policymakers can set the savings rate as an intermediate target to affect investment and real income.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Feldstein-Horioka puzzle, Malaysia, ARDL
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G15 - International Financial Markets

References

Ang, J. B. (2007). Are Saving and Investment Cointegrated? The Case of Malaysia (1965–2003). Applied Economics, 39(17), 2167–2174.

Apergis, N., & Tsoumas, C. (2009). A survey of the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: What has been done and where we stand. Research in Economics, 63(2), 64–76.

Braun, M., & Raddatz, C. (2007). Trade Liberalization, Capital Account Liberalization and the Real Effects of Financial Development. Journal of International Money and Finance, 26, 730–761.

De Vita, G., & Abbott, A. (2002). Are Saving and Investment Cointegrated? An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Economics Letters, 77(2), 293–299.

Eaton, J., Kortum, S. S., & Neiman, B. (2015). Obstfeld and Rogoff’s International Macro Puzzles: A Quantitative Assessment (NBER Working Paper Series No. 21774). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21774

Feldstein, M., & Horioka, C. (1980). Domestic Saving and International Capital Flows Reconsidered. Economic Journal, 90(358), 314–329. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w4892.pdf

Ford, N., & Horioka, C. Y. (2016). The “Real” Explanation of the FH Puzzle (NBER Working Paper Series No. 22081). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w22081

Kaplan, E., & Rodrik, D. (2002). Did the Malaysian Capital Controls Work? In S. Edwards & J. A. Frankel (Eds.), Preventing Currency Crises in Emerging Markets (Vol. I, pp. 393–440). University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/chapters/c10640

Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1–3), 159–178.

Lumsdaine, R. L., & Papell, D. H. (1997). Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212–218.

Mitchell, H., & Joseph, S. (2010). Changes in Malaysia: Capital Controls, Prime Ministers and Political Connections. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 18(5), 460–476.

Narayan, P. K. (2005). The Saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration Tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990.

Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2000). The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause? NBER Macroeconomics Annual (Vol. 15).

Pesaran, B., & Pesaran, M. H. (2009). Time Series Econometrics Using Microfit 5.0. Oxford University Press.

Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In S. Strøm (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. (pp. 371–413). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.

Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. L. (2007). New Improved Tests for Cointegration with Structural Breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 28(2), 188–224.

Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270.