The Short Rise and Long Fall of heterodox Economics in germany After the 1970s: Explorations in a Scientific Field of Power and Struggle.

Heise, Arne and Thieme, Sebastian (2016): The Short Rise and Long Fall of heterodox Economics in germany After the 1970s: Explorations in a Scientific Field of Power and Struggle. Published in: Journal of Economic Issues , Vol. L, No. 4 (2016): pp. 1105-1130.

Abstract

In the context of ongoing criticisms of the lack of pluralism in economics, the present article aims to discuss the development of ‘heterodox’ economics since the 1970s. Following Lakatos’s concept of scientific research programs (srp), and concentrating on the situation in Germany, the article will discuss classifications of economics, and will specify the understanding of diversity in the light of ‘axiomatic variations’ of the economic mainstream. This will form the basis for the subsequent description of the development of heterodoxy in Germany, with special reference to the founding of new universities and the reform movements in the 1970s. It can be shown that the heterodox scene flourished in this period, but that this pluralization remained fragmented and short-lived; by the 1980s at the latest heterodoxy was again on its way to marginalization. The history of heterodoxy in Germany thus presents itself as an unequal ‘battle of the paradigms,’ and can only be told as the story of a failure.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Heterodox economics, pluralization, philosophy of science, sociology of science
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B50 - General; N - Economic History > N0 - General > N01 - Development of the Discipline: Historiographical; Sources and Methods; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Abel, Andrew B. and Ben S. Bernanke. Macroeconomics, Boston: Addison Wesley, 2005

Abramovitz, M. et al. “Plea for a Pluralist and Rigorous Economics.” American Economic Review 82, 2 (1992): XXXV

Arrow, Kenneth J. “Workshop on the Economy as an Evolving Complex System: Summary.” In The Economy As An Evolving Complex System edited by Philip W. Anderson, Kenneth J. Arrow and David Pines, pp. 275-284 ,Redwood: West View Press, 1988

Arthur, W. Brian. Complexity, the Santa Fe approach, and non-equilibrium economics. History of Economic Ideas 18, 2 (2010): 149 - 166

Auroi, Claude et al. “Renewing the research and teaching in finance, economics and management to better serve the common good.“ Geneva, Fribourg, Zurich, March 2011. Available at http://www.responsiblefinance.ch/aufruf/. Accessed August 18, 2016

Backhouse, Roger E. “On the credentials of methodological pluralism.” In Economics Broadly Considered: Essays in Honor of Warren J. Samuels edited by Jeff E. Biddle, John B. Davis and Steven G. Medema, pp. 161-181, London: Routledge, 2001

---------- “The Rise of Free Market Economics: Economists and the Role of the State since 1970.” History of Political Economy, 37 (2005): 355 - 392

Barkley Rosser, John Jr. (2004) “Introduction.” In Complexity in Economics. Methodology, Interacting Agents, and Microeconomic Models edited by John Barkley Rosser Jr., pp.1-20, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004

Besley, Tim and Peter Hennessey. “Letter in response to a question of Queen Elizabeth.” British Academy of Science, London July 2009. Available at http://www.feed-charity.org/user/image/besley-hennessy2009a.pdf. Accessed August 18, 2016

Blanchard, Olivier. “The State of Macro.” NBER Working Paper 14259. NBER August 2008

----------, Giovanni Dell’Ariccia and Paolo Mauro. “Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy.” IMF Staff Position Note 10/03. Washington. February 2010

---------- and David R. Johnson. Macroeconomics, New York: Pearson, 2013 (6th edn.)

Bloch, Roland and Anke Burkhardt. “Arbeitsplatz Hochschule und Forschung für wissenschaftliches Personal und Nachwuchskräfte.“ In Expertise für die Hochschule der Zukunft edited by Hans Böckler Stiftung, pp. 401-478, Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2011

Blume, Lawrence E. and Steven Durlauf. “The Interaction-Based Approach to Socioeconomic Behavior.” In Social Dynamics, edited by Steven N. Durlauf and H. Peyton Young, pp. 15-44, Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 2001

Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Forms of Capital” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education edited by John E. Richardson, pp241-258, New York: Greenwood Press, 1986

------------ Homo Academicus, Cambridge: University Press, 1990

------------ The Rules of Art. Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Stanford: University Press, 1995

Bronk, Richard. “Epistemological difficulties with neoclassical economics.” Paper presented at the Southern Economic Conference, 20th November 2011. Available at http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/39423/). Accessed August 18 2016

Busch, Alexander. Die Geschichte des Privatdozenten. Eine soziologische Studie zur großbetrieblichen Entwicklung der deutschen Universitäten, Stuttgart: Enke, 1959

Caballero, Ricardo J. “Macroeconomics after the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense-of-Knowledge Syndrome.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 4 (2010), 85 – 102

Chesney, Marc et al. “Baseler Manifest für ökonomische Aufklärung“, Zentrum für Religion, Wirtschaft und Politik. Basel. November 2011. Available at http://www.zrwp.ch/uploads/basler_manifest.pdf. Accessed August 18 2016

Clower, Robert. “The Keynesian Counter-Revolution: A Theoretical Appraisal.” In The Theory of Interest Rates, edited by Frank H. Hahn and F. P.R. Brechling, pp. 103-125, London: Macmillan ,1965

Cohen, Avi J. and Geoffrey C. Harcourt. “Whatever Happened to Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 1 (2003), 199 - 214

Colander, David C., Richard C.F. Holt and J. Barkley Rosser Jr. “Introduction.” In Changing Face of Economics: Conversations with Cutting Edge Economists edited by David C. Colander, Richard C.F. Holt and J. Barkley Rosser Jr., pp. 1 – 25, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2009

---------- and Arjo Klamer. (1987) “The Making of an Economist.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1, 2 (1987), 95 – 111

Cross, Richard. “The Duhem-Quine-Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics.” Economic Journal, Vol. 92 (1982), 320- 340

Davidson, Paul. “Reviving Keynes’ Revolution.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 6, 4 (1984), 561-575

----------- “Would Keynes be a New Keynesian?” Eastern Economic Review, 18, 4 (1992), 449 - 463

----------- “Responses to Lavoie, King, and Dow on What Post Keynesianism Is and Who Is a Post Keynesian.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27, 3 (2005), 393–408

----------- “What was the primary factor encouraging mainstream economists to marginalize post Keynesian theory?” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 37, 3 (2015), 369 - 383

Davis, John B. “Pluralism in social economics.” History of Economic Ideas, 2, 3 (1994), 119 - 128

Dobusch, Leonhard and Jakob Kapeller. “Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues, XLV, 4 (2012), 1035 - 1057

Drakopoulos, Stavros A. and Anastassios D. Karayiannis. “A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian ‘Explanations’ in Economics.” History of Economic Ideas, 12, 2 (2005), 51 - 73

Düppe, Till and E. Roy Weintraub. Finding Equilibrium. Arrow, Debreu, McKenzie and the Problem of Scientific Credit, Princeton: University Press, 2014

Feyerabend, Paul. Against method, London: New Left Books, 1975

Finkenstaedt, Thomas. “Die Universitätslehrer.“ In Geschichte der Universität in Europa, Vol. IV: Vom Zweiten Weltkrieg bis zum Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts edited by Walter A. Rüegg, pp. 153 - 188, Munich: Beck, 2010

Fontana, Magda. “The Complexity Approach to Economics: A Paradigm Shift”. Working paper No.8. Department of Economics. University of Torino, 2008

Fourcade, Marion. Economists and Societies. Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton: University Press, 2009

Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion. “Politics, institutional structures, and the rise of economics: A comparative study.” Theory and Society, 30 (2001), 397 – 447

Frey, Beuno S., Stefan Humbert and Friedrich Schneider. “Was denken deutsche Ökonomen? Eine empirische Auswertung einer Internetbefragung unter den Mitgliedern des Vereins für Socialpolitik im Sommer 2006.“ Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 8, 4 (2007), 359–377

Galbraith, James K. “The Third Crisis in Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues, 47, 2 (2013), 311 – 322

Garnett, Robert F. Jr. “Paradigms and pluralism in heterodox economics.” Review of Political Economy, 18, 4 (2006), 521 - 546

Gräfing, Birte. Tradition Reform. Die Universität Bremen 1971 – 2001, Bremen: Donat, 2012

Graham, Hugh D. and Nancy Diamond. The Rise of American Research Universities. Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1997

Greenfield, Robert L. “Walras’s law in Macroeconomic Disequilibrium.” Austrialian Economic Papers, 25, 47 (1986), 257 - 260

Heise, Arne. “Krise der Wirtschaftswissenschaft – Raum für Alternativen? Plädoyer für einen Pluralismus in der Ökonomik.“ In: Methodenpluralismus in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften, edited by Uwe Jens and Hajo Romahn, pp. 33 – 50, Marburg, 2010

-----------, Katrin Hirte, Walter O. Ötsch, Stephan Pühringer, Andreas Reichl, Henrike Sander and Sebatsian Thieme. Ökonomen und Ökonomie. Eine wissenschaftssoziologische Entwicklungsanalyse zum Verhältnis von Ökonomen und Ökonomie im deutschsprachigen Raum ab 1945. Final Report of Research Projekt sponsored by the Hans Böckler Foundation, Hamburg/Linz 2015 (unpublished manuscript)

-----------, Jürgen Kromphardt and Jan Priewe. „Alternative Konzeptionen makroökonomischer Politik im Spannungsfeld von Arbeitslosigkeit, Globalisierung und hoher Staatsverschuldung.“ In Die arbeitslose Gesellschaft und ihr Sozialstaat edited by Kai Eicker-Wolf et al., pp. 95 – 136, Marburg: Metropolis, 1998

Hermann-Pillath, Carsten. Grundriß der Evolutionsökonomik, München: W. Fink, 2002

Hesse, Jan-Otmar. Wirtschaft als Wissenschaft. Die Volkswirtschaftslehre in der frühen Bundesrepublik, Frankfurt: Campus, 2010

-------- “Hochschulreformgeschichte als Disziplingeschichte – Das Beispiel der Wirtschaftswissenschaften.“ In: Zwischen Idee und Zweckorientierung. Vorbilder und Motive von Hochschulreformen seit 1945 edited by Andreas Franzmann and Barbara Wolbring, pp. 121-135, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2007

Kampe, Dieter. “‚Fünf Weise‘ in der Wirtschaft – Sachverstand live erlebt.“ In Millionen Arbeitslose! Streitschrift gegen den Rat der Fünf Weisen. Eine Bilanz nach zwanzig Jahren, edited by Rudolf Hickel and Harald Mattfeldt, pp. 35-52, Reinbeck b. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1983

Kellert, Stephen H., Helen E. Longino and C. Kenneth Waters. (eds.) Scientific Pluralism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006

Keynes, John Maynard. “Poverty in Plenty.” In The Listener of 21. November 1934 (this quote from Moggridge, Donald. (ed.) Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XIII, London: Macmillan 1973, pp. 485 – 492)

----------- The General theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan 1936

King, John E. “Three arguments for pluralism.” Journal of Australian Political Economy, 50 (2002a), 82 – 88

---------- A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002b

Klamer, Arjo. “Does this Have to Be our Future?” In: Colander, D.; The Making of an Economist, Redux edited by David Colander, pp. 227-233, Princeton: University Press, 2007

Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University Press, 1962

---------- “Reflections on my Critics.” In Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, pp. 231-278, Cambridge: University Press, 1970

Lakatos, Imre. “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes.” In Worrall, J., Currie, G. (eds.); Imre Lakatos. The Methodology of Scientifc Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers Vol. I edited by John Worrall and Gregory Currie, pp. 8 – 71, Cambridge: University Press, 1978

Lawson, Tony. “The Nature of Heterodox Economics” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 4 (2006), 483 – 507

Lee, Frederic S. A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the Mainstream in the 20th Century, New York: Routledge, 2009

Lucas, Robert E. jr. “Macroeconomic Priorities.” American Economic Review, 93, 1 (2009), 1 – 14

Merkel, Angela. „Rede von Frau Bundeskanzlerin Merkel bei der 5. Lindauer Tagung der Wirtschaftswissenschaften“ am 20. August 2014. Available at: https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Rede/2014/08/2014-08-20-lindau.html. Accessed August 18 2016

Mirowski, Philip. More heat than light. Economics as social physics: Physics as nature’s economics, Cambridge: University Press, 1989

Mishan, Ezra J. “Say’s Law and Walras’ Law once more.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77, 4 (1963), 617-625

Möller, Claudia. “Wie offen ist die Universitätsprofessur für soziale Aufsteigerinnen und Aufsteiger?“ Soziale Welt, 64 (2013), 341 - 360

Planck, Max. Wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie, Leipzig: J. A. Barth, 1948

Ptak, Ralf. Vom Ordoliberalismus zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Stationen des Neoliberalismus in Deutschland, Opladen: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2004

Rosser, J. Barkley Jr., Richard P. F. Holt and David Colander. European Economics at a Crossroads, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010

Sargent, Thomas J. Macroeconomic Theory, New York: Emerald, 1979

Schipper, Lena. “Marx im Regen.“ In Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 8 October 2013. Available at http://www.faz.net/-gyq-7i47e . Accessed August 18 2016

Schmidt, Christof M. and Nils aus dem Moore. “Die Methodendiskussion in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften vor dem Hintergrund der Finanzkrise.“ In Methodenpluralismus in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften edited by Uwe Jens and Hajo Romahn, pp. 143-182, Marburg: Metropolis, 2010

Skousen, Mark. “The Perseverance of Paul Samuelson’s Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 2 (1997), 137 – 152

Smith, Vernon L. “Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics.” In The Nobel Prizes 2002 edited by Tore Frängsmyr, pp. 502-561, Stockholm: Nobel Foundation, 2003

Snowdon, Brian and Howard R. Vane. “The development of modern macroeconomics.” In A Macroeconomic Reader edited by Brian Snowdon and Howard R. Vane, pp. 1 – 25, London: Routledge, 1997

Solow, Robert. “What is a Nice Girl Like You Doing in a Place Like This? Macroeconomics after fifty years.” Eastern Economic Journal, 12, 3 (1986), 191 – 198

Sraffa, Piero. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Cambirdge: University Press, 1960 Stabu. Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.4, Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt, 2012

Stiglitz, Josef E. “Moving Beyond Market Fundamentalism to A More Balanced Economy.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80, 3 (2009a), 345-360

------- “The Current Economic Crisis and Lessons for Economic Theory.” Eastern Economic Journal, 35, 3 (2009b), 281 - 296

------- “Rethinking Macroeconomics: What Failed and How to Repair It.” Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 4 (2011), 591-645

------- “The Lessons of the North Atlantic Crisis for Economic Theory and Policy.” In What Have We Learned? Macroeconomic Policy after the Crisis edited by George Akerlof, Olivier Blanchard, David Romer and Josef E. Stiglitz, pp. 335 – 347, Cambridge (Mass.) and London: MIT Press, 2014

Summers, Peter M. “What caused the Great Moderation? Some Cross-Country Evidence.” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 90, 3 (2005), 5 – 32

Thielemann, Ulrich et al. “Für eine Erneuerung der Ökonomie. Memorandum besorgter Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, Berlin March 2012. Available at http://www.mem-wirtschaftsethik.de/memorandum-2012/. Accessed August 16 2016

Vogt, Winfried. “Einleitung.“ In Seminar: Politische Ökonomie. Zur Kritik der herrschenden Nationalökonomie edited by Winfried Vogt, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1973

von der Vring, Thomas. Hochschulreform in Bremen, Bericht des Rektors über Gründung und Aufbau der Universität Bremen während seiner Amtszeit von 1970 – 1974, Frankfurt/Cologne: Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1975

Woodford, Michael. “Financial Intermediation and Macroeconomic Analysis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 4 (2010), 21 – 44.