Logo
Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Dealing with Overleverage: Restricting Leverage vs. Restricting Variable Compensation

Gete, Pedro and Gomez, Juan Pedro (2017): Dealing with Overleverage: Restricting Leverage vs. Restricting Variable Compensation. Forthcoming in: Quarterly Journal of Finance

[thumbnail of MPRA_paper_80642.pdf]
Preview
PDF
MPRA_paper_80642.pdf

Download (378kB) | Preview

Abstract

We study policies that regulate executive compensation in a model that jointly determines executives effort, compensation and firm leverage. The market failure that justifies regulation is that executives are optimistic about asset prices in states of distress. We show that shareholders propose compensation packages that lead to socially excessive leverage. Say-on-pay regulation does not reduce the incentives for leverage. Regulating the structure of compensation (but not its level) with a cap on the ratio of variable-to-fixed pay delivers the right leverage. However, it is more efficient to directly regulate leverage because restricting the variable compensation impacts managerial effort more than if shareholders are free to design compensation subject to a leverage constraint.

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact us: mpra@ub.uni-muenchen.de

This repository has been built using EPrints software.

MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by Logo of the University Library LMU Munich.