Bartolini, David and Ninka, Eniel and Santolini, Raffaella (2017): Tax Decentralisation, Labour productivity and Employment.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_81070.pdf Download (278kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Tax decentralisation should improve the efficiency of local governments and ultimately boost output growth. The empirical evidence is however mixed. The current work looks at two channels through which tax decentralisation may affect economic growth: labour productivity and employment rate. The empirical analysis conducted on 20 OECD countries over the period 1980-2010 shows that the ultimate effect of fiscal decentralisation on growth depends on which channel prevails, thus rendering the direct estimation of tax decentralisation on growth ambiguous. Tax decentralisation make the employment rate grow faster, while it has either no effect of reduces labour productivity growth. When the analysis is conducted using an IV approach with instruments based on institutional similarities and geographic distance, the positive and significant effect on employment rate growth is offset by the reduction of labour productivity growth, resulting in the absence of any statistically significant effect on output growth.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Tax Decentralisation, Labour productivity and Employment |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | economic growth; labour productivity; employment rate; tax decentralisation |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence |
Item ID: | 81070 |
Depositing User: | RAFFAELLA SANTOLINI |
Date Deposited: | 31 Aug 2017 15:52 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 09:58 |
References: | Adam, A., M. Delis, and P. Kammas (2014). Fiscal decentralization and public sector efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries. Economics of Governance 15, 17-49. Arellano, M. and S. Bond (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58(2), 277-297. Armingeon, K., C. Isler, L. Kn¨opfel, D. Weisstanner, and S. Engler (2015). Comparative political data set 1960-2013. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne. Asatryan, Z. and L. P. Feld (2015). Revisiting the link between growth and federalism: A Bayesian model averaging approach. Journal of Comparative Economics 43(3), 772-781. Banzhaf, H. S. and N. Lavery (2010). Can the land tax help curb urban sprawl? Evidence from growth patterns in Pennsylvania. Journal of Urban Economics 67(2), 169-179. Barro, R. (1996). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study. NBER Working Paper No. 5698. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2), 407-443. Barro, R. J. (1995). Inflation and economic growth. NBER Working Paper No. 5326. Barro, R. J. and J. W. Lee (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950-2010. Journal of Development Economics 104, 184-198. Baskaran, T. and L. P. Feld (2013). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in OECD countries: Is there a relationship?. Public Finance Review 41(4), 421-445. Baskaran, T., L. P. Feld, and J. Schnellenbach (2014). Fiscal federalism, decentralization and economic growth: Survey and meta-analysis. CESifo Working Paper No. 4985. Baum, C. F., M. E. Schaffer, and S. Stillman (2007). Enhanced routines for instrumental variables/GMM estimation and testing. Stata Journal 7(4), 465-506. Becker, G. S. and R. J. Barro (1988). A reformtiation of the economic theory of fertility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 103(1), 1-25. Bergh, A. and M. Henrekson (2011). Government size and growth: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys 25(5), 872-897. Bodman, P. (2011). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the OECD. Applied Economics 43(23), 3021-3035. Brennan, G. and J. M. Buchanan (1980). The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press. Breusch, T. S. and A. R. Pagan (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica 47(5), 1287-1294. Brueckner, J. K. (2003). Strategic interaction among governments: An overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review 26(2), 175-188. Buser, W. (2011). The impact of fiscal decentralization on economics performance in high income OECD nations: An institutional approach. Public Choice 149(1), 31-48. Castles, F. G. (1999). Decentralization and the post war political economy. European Journal of Political Research 36(1), 27-53. Chang, R., L. Kaltani, and N. V. Loayza (2009). Openness can be good for growth: The role of policy complementarities. Journal of Development Economics 90(1), 33-49. Davoodi, H. and H. Zou (1998). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross-country study. Journal of Urban Economics 43(2), 244-257. Ebel, R. and S. Yilmaz (2003). On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization. In J. Martinez-Vazquez and J. Alm (Eds.), Public finance in developing and transitional countries: Essays in honor of Richard Bird. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Edwards, R. A. (2005). The structure of authority, federalism, commitment and economic growth. Economic Theory 25(3), 629-648. Eller, M. (2004). The determinants of fiscal decentralization and its determinants on economic growth: Empirical evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Diploma thesis. Eris., M. N. and B. Ulas.an (2013). Trade openness and economic growth: Bayesian model averaging estimate of cross-country growth regressions. Economic Modelling 33, 867-883. Feld, L. P. (2005). Fiscal federalism and economic growth in OECD countries. In A. Bergh and R. H¨oijer (Eds.), Institutional Competition, pp. 202-229. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Feld, L. P. and J. Schnellenbach (2011). Fiscal federalism and long-run macroeconomic performance: A survey of recent research. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29(2), 224-243. Filippetti, A. and A. Sacchi (2016). Decentralization and economic growth reconsidered: The role of regional authority. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34(8), 1793-1824. Gemmell, N., R. Kneller, and I. Sanz (2013). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: Spending versus revenue decentralization. Economic Inquiry 51(4), 1915-1931. Hansen, L. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50(4), 1029-1054. Hatfield, J. W. (2015). Federalism, taxation, and economic growth. Journal of Urban Economics 87, 114-125. Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6), 1251-1271. Hodrick, R. and E. Prescott (1997). Post-war U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 29(1), 1-16. Hooghe, L., G. Marks, and A. H. Schakel (2010). The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. London: Routledge. Hooghe, L., G. Marks, A. H. Schakel, S. Chapman-Osterkatz, S. Niedzwiecki, and S. Shair-Rosenfield (2016). Measuring regional authority. Volume I: A postfunctionalist theory of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Karras, G. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth can we estimate the precise effect?. Applied Econometrics and International Development 3(1), 7-25. Kleibergen, F. and R. Paap (2006). Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition. Journal of Econometrics 133(1), 97-126. Koethenbuerger, M. and B. Lockwood (2010). Does tax competition really promote growth? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34(2), 191-206. Levine, R. and D. Renelt (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. American Economic Review 82(4), 942-963. Ligthart, J. E. and P. van Oudheusden (2017). The fiscal decentralization and economic growth nexus revisited. Fiscal Studies 38(1), 141-171. Long, J. B. D. and L. H. Summers (1991). Equipment investment and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2), 445-502. Mankiw, N. G., D. Romer, and D. N. Weil (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(2), 407-437. Martínez-Vazquez, J., S. Lago-Penas, and A. Sacchi (2016). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys (in press). Martinez-Vazquez, J. and R. McNab (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World Development 31(9), 1597-1616. Martinez-Vazquez, J. and R. McNab (2006). Fiscal decentralization, macrostability and growth. Revista de Economia Publica 179(4), 25-49. Martinez-V´azquez, J. and M.-H. Yao (2009). Fiscal decentralization and public sector employment: A cross-country analysis. Public Finance Review 37(5), 539-571. Mayer, T. and S. Zignago (2011). Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: The GeoDist Database. CEPII Working Paper No. 2011-25. OECD (1999). Taxing powers of state and local government. OECD Tax Policy Studies. Paris: OECD. Rauscher, M. (2005). Economic growth and tax-competing leviathans. International Tax and Public Finance 12(4), 457-474. Rauscher, M. (2007). Tax competition, capital mobility and innovation in the public sector. German Economic Review 8(1), 28-40. Revelli, F. (2005). On spatial public finance empirics. International Tax and Public Finance 12(4), 475-492. Rodden, J. (2004). Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics 36(4), 481-500. Rodriguez-Pose, A. and R. Ezcurra (2011). Is fiscal decentralization harmful for economic growth? Evidence from the OECD countries. Journal of Economic Geography 11(4), 619-643. Sala-i-Martin, X., G. Doppelhofer, and R. L. Miller (2004). Determinants of long-term growth: A Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. American Economic Review 94(4), 813-835. Staiger, D. and J. H. Stock (1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3), 557-586. Stegarescu, D. (2004). Public sector decentralisation: Measurement concepts and recent international trends. ZEW Discussant Paper No. 04-74. Stegarescu, D. (2005). Public sector decentralisation: Measurement concepts and recent international trends. Fiscal Studies 26(3), 301-333. Stegarescu, D., T. Bttner, and A. Behnisch (2002). Public sector centralization and productivity growth: Reviewing the German experience. ZEW Discussion Papers No. 02-03. Thiessen, U. (2003). Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high-income OECD countries. Fiscal Studies 24(3), 237-274. Thornton, J. (2007). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered. Journal of Urban Economics 61(1), 64-70. Thorsten, B., C. George, G. Alberto, K. Philip, and W. Patrick (2001). New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15(1), 165-176. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64(5), 416-424. Zodrow, G. and P. Mieszkowski (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the under provision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics 19(3), 356-370. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/81070 |