Pursuing a pro-poor trade liberalization agenda: Regionalism, multilateralism and poverty in Uganda

Ayoki, Milton (2013): Pursuing a pro-poor trade liberalization agenda: Regionalism, multilateralism and poverty in Uganda. Published in:

Abstract

This paper compares the gains from multilateral and regional trade liberalization in context of poverty reduction—whether multilateral liberalization can be more successful in reducing poverty in Uganda than regionalism. Using a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) framework and benchmark data from Uganda national household survey, the results show that poverty falls in all cases (under multilateral liberalization and different regional integration arrangements), and but poverty falls much more under multilateral trade liberalization.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Computable General Equilibrium Models, Micro-Simulation Analysis, Trade Policies, Poverty, Uganda.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C68 - Computable General Equilibrium Models; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation

References

Adelman, I and S. Robinson. 1978. Income distribution policy: A computable general equilibrium model of South Korea, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Alarcon, J., S. Baryahirwa., S. Bahemuka., J. van Heemst., I. Kasirye., N. Rudaheranwa., and P. de Valk. 2006. Social Accounting Matrix Uganda 2002: Project report – Output, Procedures and Methodology, The Hague, August 2006.

Appleton, S. 1999 Changes in poverty in Uganda, 1992-1997, WPS/99.22, unpublished report, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.

Armington, P. 1969. “A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production”, IMF Staff Papers.

Boccanfuso, D and L. Savard. 2005. Impact analysis of the liberalisation of groundnut production in Senegal: A multiple household computable general equilibrium model, Working Paper 05-12, Groupe de Recherche en Économie et Développement International.

Bourguignon, F and A. Spadaro. 2005. “Macrosimulation as a tool for evaluating redistribution policies”, Working Paper No. 2005-02, Paris: Paris-Jourdain Sciences Économiques.

Chen, S and M. Ravallion. 2004. “How have the world’s poorest fared since the early 1980s?” World Bank Research Observer 19.

Chitiga, M., T. Kandiero and R. Mabugo. 2005. “Computable general equilibrium micro simulation analysis of the impact of trade policies on poverty in Zimbabwe, PEP Working Paper 2005-01. Available at www.pep-net.org.

Cockburn, J. 2001. Trade liberalisation and poverty in Nepal: A computable general equilibrium micro simulation analysis, CREFA Working Paper (01-18).

Cogneau, D and A.S. Robillard. 2000. Income distribution, poverty and growth in Madagascar: Micro simulations in a general equililbrium framework, IFPRI TMD Discussion Paper No. 61, Washington, D.C: IFPRI.

Cororaton, C.B. 2003. Analysis of trade reforms, income inequality and poverty using microsimulation approach: The case of Philippines, Discussion Paper No. 2003-09, Philippines Institute of Development Studies.

Cororaton, C.B., J. Cockburn and E. Corong. 2005. Doha scenarios, trade reforms, and poverty in the Philippines: A CGE analysis, MPIA Working Paper 2005-03, PEP. www.pep-net.org.

Dervis, K., J. De Melo and S. Robinson. 1982. General equilibrium Models for development policy, London: Cambridge University Press.

Decaluwé, B., A. Patry., L. Savard and E. Thorbecke. 1999. Poverty Analysis within a General Equilibrium Framework, CREFA Working Paper 9909, Université Laval, available at http://www.crefa.ecn.ulaval.cahier/liste99.html.

Foster, J., J. Greer and E. Thorbecke. 1984., “A Class of decomposable poverty measure”, Econometrica, 52(3).

Hertel, T.W., M. Ivanic, P.V. Preckel and J.A.L. Cranfield. 2003. Trade liberalisation and the structure of poverty in developing countries, Paper prepared for the Conference on Globalisation, Agricultural Development and Rural Livelihood, Cornell University, Ithaca, 11-12 April 2003.

Hertel, T.W and J.J. Reimer. 2004. Predicting the poverty impacts of trade reform, Policy Research Working Paper 3444, Washington, D.C: World Bank.

Morrison, C. 1991. “Adjustment, incomes and poverty in Morocco”, World Development, Vol. 19, No. 11.

Ravallion, M. 1994. Poverty comparisons, Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Press.

Ravallion, M and M. Lokshin. 1994. “Gainers and losers from trade reform in Morocco”, Mimeo, paper presented at the Seventh Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Washington, D.C.

Reimer, J. J. 2002. “Estimating the poverty impacts of trade liberalization”, GTAP Working Paper No. 20.

Savard, L. 2005. “Poverty and inequality Analysis within A CGE Framework: A Comparative Analysis of the Representative Agent and Microsimulation Approaches”, Development Policy Review, vol. 23, No. 3.

Thorbecke, E. 1991. “Adjustment, growth and income distribution in Indonesia and equity in Indonesia”, World Development, Vol. 19, No. 11.

Winters, L. A. 2000 “Trade, trade policy and poverty: What are the links?”, Discussion Paper No. 2382, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

Winters, L.A., N. McCulloch and A. McKay. 2004. “Trade Liberalisation and poverty: The empirical evidence so far”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XLII.