NAQI SHAH, SADIA and QAYYUM, ABDUL (2016): Analyse Risk-Return Paradox: Evidence from Electricity Sector of Pakistan. Published in: Research Journal Social Science , Vol. 5, No. 2 (2016): pp. 117-138.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_85528.pdf Download (649kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study analysis risk return relationship of the electricity companies of Pakistan by using the return series of these electricity companies. Financial time series data have the property of autoregressive heteroscedasticity so move towards the ARCH family test. As the study want to analyse the risk return relationship so, GARCH-M Model of Engel et al (1987) is used, who empirically found relationship between risk and return. Results show that risk return in case of Pakistan electricity companies is not a specific relation (negative or positive) rather they show paradox of risk return.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Analyse Risk-Return Paradox: Evidence from Electricity Sector of Pakistan |
English Title: | Analyse Risk-Return Paradox: Evidence from Electricity Sector of Pakistan |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | GARCH-M, Risk Return Relation, Paradox, GARCH-M |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services |
Item ID: | 85528 |
Depositing User: | Dr Abdul Qayyum |
Date Deposited: | 29 Mar 2018 17:28 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 19:28 |
References: | Amit, R. and J. Livnat (1988) Diversification and the Risk-return Trade-off. Academy of Management Journal 31:1, 154–166. Bettis, R. A. and W. K. Hall (1982) Diversification Strategy, Accounting Determined Risk, and Accounting Determined Return. Academy of Management Journal 25:2, 254–264. Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31:3, 307–327. Bollerslev, T., R. F. Engle, and B. D. Nelson (1994) ARCH Models. Handbook of Econometrics 4, 2959–3038. Bowman, E. H. (1980) A Risk/Return Paradox for Strategic Management. Cotter, J. and E. Salvador (2014) The Non-linear Trade-off between Return and Risk: A Regime-switching Multi-factor Framework. Available at SSRN 2513282. Ding, D. (2011) Modeling of Market Volatility with APARCH Model. Projet Report-Uppsala Universitet 16. Engle, R. F. (1982) Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 987–1007. Engle, R. F., M. D. Lilien, and R. P. Robins (1987) Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in Term Structure. The ARCH-M Model. Journal of Econometrica 55, 391–407. Fiegenbaum, A. and H. Thomas (1988) Attitudes Toward Risk and the Risk–return Paradox: Prospect Theory Explanations. Academy of Management Journal 31:1, 85–106. Fraser, J. M. (2005) Lessons from the Independent Private Power Experience in Pakistan. World Bank Group, Energy and Mining Sector Board. Frecka, T. J. and C. F. Lee (1983) Generalised Financial Ratio Adjustment Processes and Their Implications. Journal of Accounting Research, 308–316. Ghysels, E. (2014) Regime Switches in the Risk–return Trade-off. Journal of Empirical Finance 28, 118–138. Glosten, L. R., R. Jagannathan, and D. E. Runkle (1993) On the Relation Between the Expected Value of the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks. Journal of Finance 48, 1779–1801. Jegers, M. (1991) Prospect Theory and the Risk-return Relation: Some Belgian Evidence. Academy of Management Journal 34:1, 215–225. Khan, M. A. and U. Ahmad (2008) Energy Demand in Pakistan: A Disaggregate Analysis. The Pakistan Development Review 47:4, 437–455. Khurshid, M. and W. Anwar (2013) Energy Crisis and Performance of Industry of Pakistan: An Empirical Study of KSE Listed Companies. International Journal of African and Asian Studies 2, 50–55. Kinnunen, J. (2014) Risk-return Trade-off and Serial Correlation: Do Volume and Volatility Matter? Journal of Financial Markets 20, 1–19. Lanne, M. and P. Saikkonen (2006) Why is it So Difficult to Uncover the Risk–return Tradeoff in Stock Returns? Economics Letters 92:1, 118–125. Malik, A. (2012) Power Crisis in Pakistan: A Crisis in Governance?, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad. (PIDE Monograph Series). Markowitz, H. (1952) Harry M. Markowitz. Portfolio Selection, Journal of Finance 7:1, 77–91. Merton, R. C. (1973) An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 867–887. Mirza, K. U. Ahmad, N. Majeed, and K. Harijan (2007) Wind Energy Development in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11:9, 2179–2190. Nelson, D. B. (1991) Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 347–370. Nishat, M. (2001) Industry Risk Premia in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review 40:4, 929–949. Nyberg, H. (2012) Risk-return Tradeoff in US Stock Returns Over the Business Cycle. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 47:01, 137–158. OECD (2003) World Energy Outlook, OECD/IEA. Salvador, E. (2012) The Risk-return Trade-off in Emerging Markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 48:6, 106–128. Selection, P. (1959) Harry M. Markowitz. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Shah, S. and M. Bhatti (2009) Crisis of Electrical Energy in Pakistan and Future Guideline for Policy Makers. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences IJBAS/IJENS 9:9, 1–17. Tsay, R. S. (2005) Analysis of Financial Time Series. John Wiley & Sons. Yasar, A., A. Ali, B. A. Tabinda, and A. Tahir (2015) Waste to Energy Analysis of Shakarganj Sugar Mills; Biogas Production from the Spent Wash for Electricity Generation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 43, 126–132. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/85528 |