Colonial Origins and Comparative Development: Institutions Matter

Chakraborty, Adrij (2017): Colonial Origins and Comparative Development: Institutions Matter.

Abstract

A large literature is present on how colonial origins through the channels of Institutions and human capital explain the income variation between countries. In most cases, it is argued that colonial European settlement outside of Europe has shaped the type of institutions present today that explain the gap between income levels of countries. Others criticize this claim on the basis that firstly, geography plays a prominent role in income variation and secondly, the studies in favor of the primacy of the role of institutions suffer from measurement error and bias. In this study, we analyze the role colonial origins and geography play in comparative income levels of countries today. In this study, we present a theoretical analysis for what determines growth in the long run and how colonial origins come into play and then make an empirical study using OLS and IV techniques, while utilizing recent data and different proxies, into the claims that colonial origins and/or geography play the prominent role. We also investigate whether the institutions primacy studies suffer from measurement error. Our findings point out that while geography may play a small role, majority of the income variation is associated with institutions and colonial origins.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Colonial Origins, Comparative Development, Institutions, Economic Growth
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I12 - Health Behavior; N - Economic History > N1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics ; Industrial Structure ; Growth ; Fluctuations > N10 - General, International, or Comparative; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy; P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems > P51 - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson J.A., 2001. The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation, American Economic Review, December, 91, 5, 1369-1401

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J.A., 2006. Reply to the Revised (May 2006) Version of David Albouy’s The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Investigation of the Settler Mortality Data. Unpublished, September, MIT and Harvard

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J.A., 2005. A response to Albouy’s A Reexamination Based on Improved Settler Mortality Data, MIT Department of Economics Working Paper

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J.A., 2012. Hither Thou Shalt Come, But No Further: Reply to “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Comment”. April, MIT and Harvard Working Paper 16966

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson and James A. Robinson, 2002b. ―The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change and Economic Growth‖ NBER Working Paper #9378.

Acemoglu, D., Johnson S., Robinson J.A., Thaicharoen Y., 2003. ―Institutional Causes, Macroeconomic Symptoms: Volatility, Crises and Growth,‖ Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 49-123

Albouy, D., 2004b. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: A Reexamination Based on Improved Settler Mortality Data”, University of California — Berkeley, December

Albouy, D.Y., 2008. The colonial origins of comparative development: an investigation of the settler mortality data (No. w14130). National Bureau of Economic Research

Albouy, D.Y., 2012. The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation: comment. The American Economic Review, 102(6), pp.3059-3076

Boulhol H., 2004. Technology differences, institutions and economic growth: a conditional conditional convergence, Centre d'Études Prospectives et d'Informations Internationale

Curtin, P.D., 1998. Disease and empire: The health of European Troops in the Conquest of Africa. Cambridge University Press

Diamond, J.M., 1997. Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fate of Human Societies, W.W. Norton & Co., New York NY

Easterly W., Levine R., 2015. The European Origins of Economic Development (Working Paper 18162). National Bureau of Economic Research

Knack, Steven and Philip Keefer, 1995, Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Measures, Economics and Politics, 7, pp. 207–27

Rodrik, D., 2000. Institutions for high-quality growth: what they are and how to acquire them. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), pp.3-31

Rodrik, D., Subramanian A., and Trebbi F., (forthcoming). ―Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development”, Journal of Economic Growth

Hall, R.E. and Jones, C.I., 1999. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? (No. w6564). National bureau of economic research

Fernandez, A.M. and Kraay, A., 2005. Property rights institutions, contracting institutions, and growth in South Asia: Macro and Micro Evidence. The World Bank. Background paper prepared for the SAARC Business Leaders‘ Conclave: South Asia Regional Integration and Growth, New Delhi, November, pp.17-18

Green, A. and Moser, C., 2012. Do Property Rights Institutions Matter at the Local Level? Evidence from Madagascar. Journal of Development Studies, (December 2012), pp.1–15

Gehlbach, S. and Keefer, P., 2011. Investment without democracy: Ruling-party institutionalization and credible commitment in autocracies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(2), pp.123-139

McArthur, J.W. and Sachs, J.D., 2001. Institutions and Geography: Comment on Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2000) (No. w8114). National bureau of economic research

North, Douglass C. and Robert P.T., 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

Bloom, D.E., Sachs, J.D., Collier, P. and Udry, C., 1998. Geography, demography, and economic growth in Africa. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1998(2), pp.207-295

Haggard, S. and Tiede, L., 2011. The rule of law and economic growth: where are we?, World Development, 39(5), pp.673-685

Glaeser, E.L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., 2004. Do institutions cause growth?, Journal of economic Growth, 9(3), pp.271-303

Vollrath D., 2014, A Sceptic’s Guide to Institution Part 1, 2, 3, 4. The Growth Economics Blog. Available from: https://growthecon.wordpress.com/2014/11/18/the-skeptics-guide-to-institutions-part-1/, https://growthecon.wordpress.com/2014/11/20/the-skeptics-guide-to-institutions-part-2/, https://growthecon.wordpress.com/2014/11/23/the-skeptics-guide-to-institutions-part-3/, https://growthecon.wordpress.com/2014/11/26/the-skeptics-guide-to-institutions-part-4/ (Accessed 3rd March 2017)

World Bank Group Development Indicators (2015) Historical data World Bank Group. Available at: http://www.wb.org/custom-query (Accessed: 22nd March 2017)

World Bank Group (2015) Historical data on GDP World Bank Group. Available at: http://www.wb.org/custom-query (Accessed: 22nd March 2017)