Present Bias in Renewable Resources Management Reduces Agent’s Welfare

Persichina, Marco (2016): Present Bias in Renewable Resources Management Reduces Agent’s Welfare.

Abstract

This study investigates the effects generated by myopic and present-biased preferences in the context of resource harvesting, specifically on the impact that the present bias has on the agent’s welfare when the agent is engaged in an intertemporal harvesting activity from a stock of renewable resources. The harvesting activity, in this context, poses a conflict between the long-run benefit of the agent and the short-run desire. The paper assumes there is evidence of the existence of a dual system of response to short and long-term stimuli. Thus, the study shows and argues that in the decision-making that involves intertemporal choices in renewable resources management, the naive behavior, strongly influenced by the emotional-affective system, leads to a reduction in the lifetime utility enjoyed by the individual because of the present bias.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Present bias, naive agent, intertemporal resource management, dual system discounting, agent’s welfare, instant utility.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D90 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q20 - General

References

Ainslie, G., 1974. Impulse control in pigeons. J. of Exp. An. of Behav., Volume 21, pp. 485-489.

Ainslie, G., 1992. Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States within the Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ainslie, G., 2005. Precis of breakdown of will. Behav. and Brain Sci., Volume 28, pp. 635-673.

Ashraf, N., Karlan, D. & Yin, W., 2006. Tying Odysseus to the mast: evidence from a commitment savings product in the Philippines. Quar. J. of Econ., 121(2), pp. 635-672.

Bechara, A., 2005. Decision-making, impulse control and loss to willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience , 8(11), pp. 1458-63.

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. & Lee, G., 1999. Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision making. J. Neurosci., 19(13), pp. 5473-5481.

Benabou, R. & Pycia, M., 2002. D ynamic inconsistency and self-control: a planner–doer interpretation. Economics Letters, Issue 77, p. 419–424.

Bernabou, R. & Tirole, J., 2003. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econ. Stu., 70(3), pp. 1652-1678.

Breiter, H. & Rosen, B. R., 1999. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of brain reward circuitry in the human.. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., Issue 877, pp. 523-547.

Brekke, K. & Jhoansson-Stenman, O., 2008. The behavioral economics of climate change.. Oxford Rev. Econ. Pol. , 24(2), pp. 280-297.

Cardinala, R. N., Parkinsonb, J. A., Halla, J. & Barry J., E., 2002. Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(3), pp. 321-352.

Cropper, M. & Laibson, D., 1998. The imlications of hyperbolic disccounting for project evaluation. Policy Research Working Paper, Issue 1943.

Damasio, A. R., 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam Berkley.

Dasgupta, P. & Maskin, E., 2005. Uncertainty, waiting costs and hyperbolic discounting. Am. Econ. Rev., 95(4), pp. 1290-1299.

Della Vigna, S., 2009. Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. J. Econ. Lett., Volume 47, pp. 315-372.

Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. & O'Donoghue, T., 2002. Time Discounting and time preference: a critical review. J. Econ. Lit., Volume 40, pp. 351-401.

Godwy, J., Barkley Rosser jr., J. & Roy, L., 2013. The evolution oh hyperbolic discounting: impllications for truly social valuation of the future. J. of Econ. behav. and Org., Volume 90, pp. 94-104.

Green, L. & Myerson, J., 1996. Exponential versus hyperbolic discount of delayed outcomes: risk and waiting times. Am Zool. , Volume 36, pp. 496-505.

Gruber, J. & Koszegi, B., 2001. Is addiction rational? Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econ., 116(4), pp. 1261-1305.

Hariri, A. R., Bookheimer, S. Y. & Mazziotta, J. C., 2000. Modulating emotional responses: effects of a neocortical network on the limbic system. Neuroreport, 11(1), pp. 43-48.

Hariri, A. R. et al., 2006. Preferences for immediate rewards is associated with magnitude of ventral striatal activity. J. Neourosci., 26(51), pp. 13213-13217.

Hariri, A. R. et al., 2002. The Amygdala Response to Emotional Stimuli: A Comparison of Faces and Scenes. NeuroImage, 17(1), p. 317–323.

Harris, C. & Laibon, D., 2001. Dynamic choices of hyperbolic consumers. Econometrica, 69(4), pp. 935-957.

Hepburn, C., Duncan, S. & Papachristodoulou, A., 2010. Behavioural economics, hyperbolic discounting and enviromental policy. Environ. Res. Econ., Volume 46, pp. 189-206.

Isaacson, R. L., 1974. The Limbic System. New York: Plenum Press.

Kahneman, D. & Sugden, R., 2005. Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32(1), p. 161–181.

Kahneman, D. & Thaler, R. H., 2006. Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), pp. 221-234.

Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P. & Sarin, R., 1997. Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), pp. 365-406.

Karp, L., 2005. Global warming and hyperbolic discounting. J. of Public Economics, Volume 89, pp. 261-282.

Knutson, B. et al., 2001. Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI.. Neuroreport, 12(17), pp. 3683-3687.

Koopmans, T. C., 1960. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Ecomometrica, Volume 28, pp. 287-309.

Laibson, D., 1997. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Eco., 112(2), pp. 443-477.

Laibson, D., Ripetto, A. & Tobacman, J., 1998. Self-control and saving for retirement. Brookings Paper Econ. Act, Volume 1, pp. 91-196.

LeDoux, J. E., 1996. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Loewenstein, G., 1996. Out of control: visceral influences on behavior. Org. Behav. Hum. Dec. Proc., Issue 65, p. 272–292.

Loewenstein, G. & Pralec, D., 1992. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Quart. J. Econ., Volume 107, pp. 573-597.

Loewenstein, G., Rick, S. & Cohen, J. D., 2008. Neuroeconomics. Ann. Rev. Psychol., Volume 59, pp. 647-672.

McClure, S., Laibson, D., Loewenstein, G. & Cohen, J., 2004. Separete neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, Volume 306, pp. 503-507.

McClure, S. M., Berns, G. S. & Montague, P. R., 2003. Temporal prediction errors in a passive learning task activate human striatum.. Neuron, 38(2), pp. 339-46.

McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., G., L. & Cohen, J. D., 2007. Time discounting for primary rewards. J. Neurosci., Volume 27, pp. 5796-5804.

Metcalfe, J. & Mischel, W., 1999. A Hot/Cool-System Analysis of Delay of Gratification: Dynamics of Willpower. Psychol. Rev. , 106(1), pp. 3-19.

Miller, E. K. & Cohen, J. D., 2001. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., Issue 24, pp. 167-202.

O'Donoghue, T. & Rabin, M., 1999. Incentives for procastination. Quart. J. Econ., 114(3), pp. 769-816.

Pattij, T. & Vanderschuren, L. J., 2008. The neuropharmacology of impulsive behaviour. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 29(4), pp. 192-199.

Persichina, M., 2016. Cascading Defections from Cooperation Triggered by Present-Biased Behaviors in the Commons. Munich Personal REPEC Archive (MPRA), Issue 83131.

Persichina, M., 2016. Other-Regarding Preferences and Social Norms in the Intergenerational Transfer of Renewable Resources when Agent has Present-biased Preferences. Munich Personal REPEC Archive (MPRA), Issue 84227.

Phelps, E. S. & Pollak, R. A., 1968. On Second-best National Saving and Game-equilibrium Growth. ReviewofEconomicStudies, Issue 35, pp. 185-199.

Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V. & Dehaene, S., 2004. Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, Volume 306, pp. 499-503.

Pol, M. v. d. & Cairns, J., 2002. A comparison of the discounted utility model and hyperbolic discounting models in the case of social and provate intertemporal preferences for health. J. econ. behav. Org., Volume 49, pp. 79-96.

Rachlin, H., 1989. Judgment, Decision and Choice: A Cognitive/Behavioral Synthesis. New York: Freeman .

Read, D., 2007. Experienced utility: Utility theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman. Thinking & Reasoning, Volume 13, pp. 45-61.

Rosati, A., Stevens, J., Hare, B. & Hauser, M., 2007. The evolutionary origins of human patience: temporal preferences in chimpanzees, bonobos, and human adults. Curr. Bio., Volume 17, pp. 1663-1668.

Settle, C. & Shogren, J., 2004. Hyperbolic discounting and time inconsistency in a native-exotic conflict. Res. Ener. Econ., 26(2), pp. 255-274.

Shefrin, H. M. & Thaler, R. H., 1988. The Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), pp. 609-643.

Smith, E. E. & Jonides, J., 1999. Storage and Executive Processes in the Frontal Lobes. Science, 283(5408), pp. 1657-1661.

Stiegler, R. & Booth, J., 2004. Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Dev., Volume 75, pp. 428-444.

Strotz, R., 1956. Myopia and incosistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econ. Stu., Volume 23, pp. 163-180.

Thaler, R., 1981. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economic Letters, Volume 8, pp. 201-207.

Thaler, R. & Shefrin, H., 1981. An economic theory of self-control. J. Pol. Econ., 89(2), pp. 392-406.

Wertenbroch, K., 1998. Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Mark. Sci., 17(4), pp. 317-337.

Winkler, R., 2006. Does 'better' discounting lead to 'worse' outcomes in long-run decision? the dilemma of hyperbolic discounting. Ecol. Econ., Volume 57, pp. 573-582.