Arbitrage Opportunities: Anatomy and Remediation

Peter, Bossaerts and Jason, Shachat and Kuangli, Xie (2018): Arbitrage Opportunities: Anatomy and Remediation.

Abstract

We introduce an experimental design where arbitrage opportunities emerge reliably and repeatedly. We observe significantly higher sell-side than buy-side arbitrage opportunities. We study ways to mitigate them. Relaxing margin requirements, shortsale restrictions, or both have neither statistically nor economically significant effects. Increasing competition (more participants, each with small stakes), and more impactful, participants’ stakes (few wealthy participants each with large exposures), generate large reductions in arbitrage opportunities. Hence, we advocate increased competition for small markets, and allowance for large stakes in large markets, rather than relaxation of rules on margin purchases or shortsales.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Limits of arbitrage, Experimental asset markets, Market capitilization
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D53 - Financial Markets; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G12 - Asset Pricing ; Trading Volume ; Bond Interest Rates

References

Ackert, L. F., Charupat, N., Church, B. K., and Deaves, R. (2006). An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting. Experimental Economics, 9(1): 5–16.

Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3):637–654.

Caginalp, G., Porter, D., and Smith, V. (1998). Initial cash/asset ratio and asset prices: An experimental study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(2): 756–761.

Charness, G. and Neugebauer, T. (2017). A test of the Modigliani-Miller invariance theoremand arbitrage in experimental asset markets. The Journal of Finance. Forthcoming.

De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., and Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise trader riskin financial markets. Journal of Political Economy, 98(4): 703–738.

Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments.Ex-perimental Economics, 10(2):171–178.Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In Kremer, K.and Macho, V., editors, Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen, volume 63 of GesfurWiss. Datenverarbeitung, pages 79–93.

Haruvy, E. and Noussair, C. N. (2006). The effect of short selling on bubbles and crashes inexperimental spot asset markets.The Journal of Finance, 61(3): 1119–1157.

Houthakker, H. S. (1951). Some calculations on electricity consumption in great britain. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 114(3): 359–371.

Karolyi, G. A., Li, L., and Liao, R. (2009). A (partial) resolution of the Chinese discountpuzzle: the 2001 deregulation of the B-share market. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 1(1): 80–106.

Kirchler, M., Huber, J., and Stockl, T. (2012). Thar she bursts: Reducing confusion reducesbubbles. American Economic Review, 102(2): 865–83.

Lamont, O. A. and Thaler, R. H. (2003). Can the market add and subtract? mispricing intech stock carve-outs. Journal of Political Economy, 111(2):227–268.

Mancini-Griffoli, T. and Ranaldo, A. (2011). Limits to arbitrage during the crisis: funding liquidity constraints and covered interest parity.

Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and thetheory of investment.American Economic Review, 48(3): 261–297.

Noussair, C., Robin, S., and Ruffieux, B. (2001). Price bubbles in laboratory asset marketswith constant fundamental values. Experimental Economics, 4(1): 87–105.

Noussair, C. and Powell, O. (2010). Peaks and valleys: Price discovery in experimental asset markets with non-monotonic fundamentals. Journal of Economic Studies, 37(2): 152–180.

O’Brien, J. and Srivastava, S. (1991). Dynamic stock markets with multiple assets: An experimental analysis.The Journal of Finance, 46(5): 1811–1838.

Palan, S. (2013). A review of bubbles and crashes in experimental asset markets. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(3): 570–588.

Pontiff, J. (1996). Costly arbitrage: Evidence from closed-end funds. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(4): 1135–1151.

Porter, D. P. and Smith, V. L. (1994). Stock market bubbles in the laboratory. Applied Mathematical Finance, 1(2): 111–128.

Rietz, T. A. (2005). Behavioral mis-pricing and arbitrage in experimental asset markets. Working paper, University of Iowa.

Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing.

Ross, S. A. et al. (1973). Return, risk and arbitrage. Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research, The Wharton School, University of Pennyslvania.

Scruggs, J. T. (2007). Noise trader risk: Evidence from the Siamese twins. Journal ofFinancial Markets, 10(1): 76–105.

Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1995). The limits of arbitrage.

Smith, V. L., Suchanek, G. L., and Williams, A. W. (1988). Bubbles, crashes, and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets. Econometrica, 56(5): 1119–51.

Stockl, T., Huber, J., and Kirchler, M. (2010). Bubble measures in experimental asset markets.Experimental Economics, 13(3): 284–298.