Wu, Haoyang (2018): The revelation principle does not always hold when strategies of agents are costly.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_87919.pdf Download (103kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The revelation principle asserts that for any indirect mechanism and equilibrium, there is a corresponding direct mechanism with truth as an equilibrium. Although the revelation principle has been a fundamental theorem in the theory of mechanism design for a long time, so far the costs related to strategic actions of agents spent in a mechanism have not been fully discussed. In this paper, we investigate the correctness of the revelation principle when strategies of agents are costly. We point out two key results: (1) The strategy of each agent in the direct mechanism is just to report a type. Each agent does not need to take any other action to prove himself that his reported type is truthful, and should not play the strategy as specified in the indirect mechanism. Hence each agent should not spend the strategic costs in the direct mechanism (see Proposition 1); (2) When strategic costs cannot be neglected in the indirect mechanism, the proof of revelation principle given in Proposition 23.D.1 of the book ``A. Mas-Colell, M.D. Whinston and J.R. Green, Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press, 1995'' is wrong (see Proposition 2). We construct a simple labor model to show that a Bayesian implementable social choice function is not truthfully implementable (see Proposition 4), which contradicts the revelation principle.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The revelation principle does not always hold when strategies of agents are costly |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Revelation principle; Game theory; Mechanism design. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design |
Item ID: | 87919 |
Depositing User: | Haoyang Wu |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jul 2018 12:38 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2019 13:09 |
References: | R. Myerson, Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem, Econometrica, vol.47, 61-73, 1979. A. Mas-Colell, M.D. Whinston and J.R. Green, Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press, 1995. Y. Narahari et al, Game Theoretic Problems in Network Economics and Mechanism Design Solutions, Springer, 2009. \bibitem{Spence1973} M. Spence, Job Market Signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.87, 355-374, 1973. A. Kephart and V. Conitzer, The revelation principle for mechanism design with reporting cost, In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2016. J. Green and J.J. Laffont, Partially verifiable information and mechanism design. Review of Economic Studies, vol.53, 447-456, 1986. L. Yu, Mechanism design with partial verification and revelation principle. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol.22, 217-223, 2011. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/87919 |