Propensity to search and income elasticity of demand: does the equilibrium really exist?

Malakhov, Sergey (2018): Propensity to search and income elasticity of demand: does the equilibrium really exist? Published in: Expert Journal of Economics , Vol. 6, No. 1 (17 June 2018): pp. 15-25.

Abstract

The analysis of the propensity to search under price dispersion discovers the identity of the optimal consumption-leisure choices in the model of optimal search and in the classical model of individual labor supply when the propensity to search is unimportant. However, the vigorous propensity to search, which occurs when consumers visit high-price stores, challenges the classical view on the optimal labor-leisure trade-off. The vigorous propensity to search creates the positive consumption-leisure relationship. The willingness to substitute labor by search under price dispersion also changes the understanding of the income elasticity of demand. The modest propensity to search creates normal but income inelastic demand. The income elastic demand becomes the result of the vigorous propensity to search where consumption-leisure trade-off is positive and either consumption or leisure becomes “bad”. This theoretical assumption proves the occurrence of Veblen effect as well as money illusion and creates doubts in the existence of the general equilibrium.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: propensity to search, income elasticity of demand, consumption-leisure choice, Veblen effect, money illusion
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness

References

1.Aguiar, M., and Hurst, E. (2007) ‘Measuring Trends in Leisure: The Allocation of Time Over Five Decades’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122 (3), 969-1006

2.Arrow, R.J.,Dasgupta P.S. (2009) 'Conspicious Consumption, Inconspicious Leisure', Economic Journal, 119 (541), 497-516

3.Botti, L., Peypoch, N., Randriamboarison, R., Solonandrasana, B. (2006) ‘An Econometric Model of Tourism Demand in France,’ MPRA Paper 25390, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Dec 2006.

4.Costa-Font, J, Gemmill, M, Rubert, G. (2009) ‘Re-visiting Health Care Luxury Good Hypothesis: aggregation, precision, and publication biases?’ HEDG working paper 09/02 (http://www.york.ac.uk/res/herc/research/hedg/wp.htm

5.Friedman, M. ([1969] 2005) ‘The Optimum Quantity of Money’ Transaction Publishers, 296 p.

6.Haq, W (2011) ‘Education: luxury or necessity’, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1302-1306.

7.Hara, C. (2005) ‘Existence of Equilibria in Economies with Bads’, Econometrica, 73, 647–658.

8.Lin, C. (2003) ‘A Backward-bending Labor Supply Curve without Income Effect’ Oxford Economic Papers 55, 336-343.

9.Malakhov, S. (2014a) ‘Satisficing Decision Procedure and Optimal Consumption-Leisure Choice.’ International Journal of Social Science Research, 2 (2), 138-151 (http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v2i2.6158)

10.Malakhov, S. (2014b) ‘Willingness to Overpay for Insurance and for Consumer Credit: Search and Risk Behavior Under Price Dispersion’, Expert Journal of Economics, 2(3), 109-119 (http://economics.expertjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/EJE_213malakhov2014pp109-119.pdf)

11.Malakhov, S. (2015) ‘Propensity to Search: common, leisure, and labor models of behavior’, Expert Journal of Economics, 3(1),63-76 (http://economics.expertjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/EJE_308malakhov63-76.pdf)

12.MarketWatch (2017) ’40% America’s lowest-inome families’ consumption goes to luxuries’ (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/low-income-families-spend-40-of-their-money-on-luxuries-2017-06-28)

13.Stigler, G. (1961) ‘The Economics of Information’, Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213-225.