Cheating and altruism by discipline

Muñoz-Izquierdo, Nora and Gil-Gómez de Liaño, Beatriz and Rin-Sánchez, Francisco Daniel and Pascual-Ezama, David (2014): Cheating and altruism by discipline.

Abstract

We examine the influence of different rewards, cash penalties and altruistic donations on cheating behavior of university students by conducting four experiments with undergraduate students of business economics, psychology and IT engineering. They were asked to toss a coin in private and we randomly assigned participants to conditions in which we manipulated the reward for a winning toss and the penalty when losing. We found that business economics students were significantly more dishonest regardless of whether the reward was a chocolate truffle or cash, and no matter if there was a penalty involved when losing. However, if the penalty was a donation to a non-profit organization, business economics students had the highest level of altruism. We additionally observed changes in the likelihood of lying when reporting the donations by manipulating the prior notice, suggesting that prior notice decreases the tendency to lie.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Cheating, altruism, penalties, donation, lying, prior notice
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy

References

Bauman, Y., and Rose, E. (2011). Selection or indoctrination: Why do economics students donate less than the rest? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 79(3), 318-327.

Becker, S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Economic Dimensions of Crime. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 13-68.

Bowers, W.J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Research, Columbia University.

Bucciol, A., Cicognani, S., and Montinari, N. (2017). Cheating in Academia: The Relevance of Social Factors. Working Papers 15/2017, University of Verona, Department of Economics.

Carter, J.R., and Irons, M.D. (1991). Are economists different, and if so, why? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 171-177.

DellaVigna, S., List, J.A., Malmendier, U., and Rao, G. (2016). Voting to tell others. The Review of Economic Studies, 84(1), 143-181.

Fischbacher, U., and Heusi, F. (2013). Lies in disguise–an experimental study on cheating. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 525-547.

Frank, R.H., Gilovich, T., and Regan, D.T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 159-171.

Gino, F., Ayal, S., and Ariely, D. (2013). Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 285-292.

Gino, F., Ayal, S., and Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20(3), 393-398.

Gino, F., and Pierce, L. (2009). Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1153-1160.

Gneezy, U., Imas, A., and Madarász, K. (2014). Conscience accounting: Emotion dynamics and social behavior. Management Science, 60(11), 2645-2658.

Gneezy, A., Imas, A., Brown, A., Nelson, L.D., and Norton, M.I. (2012). Paying to be nice: Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Science, 58(1), 179-187.

Gneezy, U. (2005). Deception: The role of consequences. The American Economic Review, 95(1), 384-394.

Grossman, Z. (2014). Strategic ignorance and the robustness of social preferences. Management Science, 60(11), 2659-2665.

Hill, J.P., and Kochendorfer, R.A. (1969). Knowledge of peer success and risk of detection as determinants of cheating. Developmental Psychology, 1(3), 231-238.

Houdek, P. (2017). A perspective on research on dishonesty: limited external validity due to the lack of possibility of self-selection in experimental designs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1566.

Houser, D., Vetter, S., and Winter, J. (2012). Fairness and cheating. European Economic Review, 56(8), 1645-1655.

Hu, Y.A., and Liu, D.Y. (2003). Altruism versus egoism in human behavior of mixed motives. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 62(4), 677-705.

Jacobsen, C., Fosgaard, T.R., and Pascual‐Ezama, D. (2018). Why do we lie? A practical guide to the dishonesty literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(2), 357-387.

Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498.

Laband, D.N., and Beil, R.O. (1999). Are economists more selfish than other social scientists? Public Choice, 100(1-2), 85-101.

Lazear, E.P., Malmendier, U., and Weber, R.A. (2012). Sorting in experiments with application to social preferences. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(1), 136-163

Lewis, A., Bardis, A., Flint, C., Mason, C., Smith, N., Tickle, C., and Zinser, J. (2012). Drawing the line somewhere: An experimental study of moral compromise. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(4), 718-725.

López-Pérez, R., and Spiegelman, E. (2019). Do economists lie more? In Dishonesty in Behavioral Economics (Ch. 3.1). Lundquist, T., Ellingsen, T., Gribbe, E., and Johannesson, M. (2009). The aversion to lying. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(1), 81-92.

Maggian, V. (2019). Negative Externalities of Cheating: An Experiment with Charities. In Dishonesty in Behavioral Economics (Ch. 3.3).

Marwell, G., and Ames, R.E. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV. Journal of Public Economics, 15(3), 295-310.

Mazar, N., Amir, O., and Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633-644.

Mazar, N., and Ariely, D. (2006). Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 117-126.

McCabe, D.L., and Treviño, L.K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522-538.

Michaels, J.W., and Miethe, T.D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70(4), 870.

Pascual-Ezama, D., Fosgaard, T.R., Cardenas, J.C., Kujal, P., Veszteg, R., Gil-Gómez de Liaño, B., Gunia, B., Weischselbaumer, D., Hilken, K., Antinyan, A., Delnoij, J., Proestakis, A., Tira, M.D., Pratomo, Y., Jaber-López, T., and Brañas-Garza, P. (2015). Context-dependent cheating: Experimental evidence from 16 countries. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 379-386.

Pascual-Ezama, D., Prelec, D., and Dunfield, D. (2013). Motivation, money, prestige and cheats. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 367-373.

Pruckner, G.J., and Sausgruber, R. (2013). Honesty on the streets: A field study on newspaper purchasing. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 661-679.

Schor, J. (2016). Debating the sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance & Management Economics, 4(3).

Shalvi, S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, M.J., and De Dreu, C.K. (2011). Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 181-190.

Yezer, A.M., Goldfarb, R.S., and Poppen, P.J. (1996). Does studying economics discourage cooperation? Watch what we do, not what we say or how we play. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1), 177-186.