Fedotenkov, Igor (2018): Corruption vs reforms: Why do voters prefer the former?
PDF
MPRA_paper_89581.pdf Download (322kB) |
Abstract
In this paper, we address the question of why voters tolerate corrupt politicians. Standard economic techniques such as expected utility maximization under uncertainty are employed. We show that a corrupt politician is less likely to institute reforms which can cause short-term losses for voters during a transitional period or lead with some probability to non-success. Voters' higher risk aversion causes an increased fear of reforms and higher tolerance for corruption. We also show that during an economic crisis the corruptionists' optimal strategy is not to institute reforms, as models with honest politicians predict, but to reduce the level of corruption. Using panel data techniques, we show that such a strategy is in line with the empirical CIS data; however, it follows with a short delay.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Corruption vs reforms: Why do voters prefer the former? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Corruption; politician; median voter; reforms; risk aversion |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D79 - Other E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E60 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth |
Item ID: | 89581 |
Depositing User: | Igor Fedotenkov |
Date Deposited: | 18 Oct 2018 18:55 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 14:42 |
References: | Arellano, M. (1987). Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 49 (4), 431-34. Arellano, M. and S. Bond (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies 58 (2), 277-297. Besley, T. and A. Prat (2006). Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? Media capture and government accountability. American Economic Review 96 (3), 720-736. Boeri, T., A. Borsch-Supan, and G. Tabellini (2002). Pension reforms and the opinions of European citizens. American Economic Review 92 (2), 396-401. Breusch, T. S. (1978). Testing for autocorrelation in dynamic linear models. Australian Economic Papers 17 (31), 334-355. Breyer, F. (1989). On the intergenerational Pareto efficiency of pay-as-you-go financed pension systems. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 643-658. Brooks, C. and J. Manza (2006). Why do welfare states persist? Journal of Politics 68 (4), 816-827. Bucciol, A., L. Cavalli, I. Fedotenkov, P. Pertile, V. Polin, N. Sartor, and A. Sommacal (2017). A large scale OLG model for the analysis of the redistributive effects of policy reforms. European Journal of Political Economy 48, 104-127. Charron, N. and A. Bagenholm (2016). Ideology, party systems and corruption voting in European democracies. Electoral Studies 41, 35-49. Choi, E. and J. Woo (2010). Political corruption, economic performance, and electoral outcomes: A cross-national analysis. Contemporary Politics 16 (3), 249-262. Chowdhury, S. K. (2004). The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: An empirical test. Economics Letters 85 (1), 93-101. Cordero, G. and A. Blais (2017). Is a corrupt government totally unacceptable? West European Politics 40 (4), 645-662. De Vries, C. E. and H. Solaz (2017). The electoral consequences of corruption. Annual Review of Political Science 20, 391-408. Del Monte, A. and E. Papagni (2001). Public expenditure, corruption, and economic growth: The case of Italy. European Journal of Political Economy 17 (1), 1-16. Denisova, I., M. Eller, and E. Zhuravskaya (2010). What do Russians think about transition? Economics of Transition 18 (2), 249-280. Ehrlich, I. and F. T. Lui (1999). Bureaucratic corruption and endogenous economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 107 (S6), S270-S293. Engler, S. (2016). Corruption and electoral support for new political parties in central and eastern Europe. West European Politics 39 (2), 278-304. Epstein, L. and S. Zin (1989). Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica 57, 937-969. Epstein, L. G. and S. E. Zin (1991). Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy 99 (2), 263-286. Fedotenkov, I. (2018). Optimal asymmetric sector-specific labour taxation in an overlapping generations model. Journal of Economics, Forthcoming. Fehr, H. and F. Kindermann (2015). Taxing capital along the transition - not a bad idea after all? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 51, 64-77. Godfrey, L. G. (1978). Testing against general autoregressive and moving average error models when the regressors include lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 46, 1293-1301. Goldsmith, A. A. (1999). Slapping the grasping hand. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 58 (4), 865-883. Hellman, J. S. (1998). Winners take all: The politics of partial reform in postcommunist transitions. World Politics 50 (2), 203-234. Hibbs Jr, D. A. (1979). The mass public and macroeconomic performance: The dynamics of public opinion toward unemployment and inflation. American Journal of Political Science 23, 705-731. Hollanders, D. and B. Vis (2013). Voters' commitment problem and reforms in welfare programs. Public Choice 155, 433-448. Konstantinidis, I. and G. Xezonakis (2013). Sources of tolerance towards corrupted politicians in Greece: The role of trade offs and individual benefits. Crime, Law and Social Change 60 (5), 549-563. Kurer, O. (2002). Why do voters support corrupt politicians? In The Political Economy of Corruption, pp. 75-98. Routledge. Lewis-Beck, M. S. and M. Stegmaier (2000). Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1), 183-219. Manzetti, L. and C. J. Wilson (2007). Why do corrupt governments maintain public support? Comparative Political Studies 40 (8), 949-970. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3), 681-712. Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics 29 (1), 66-79. Moran, J. (2001). Democratic transitions and forms of corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change 36 (4), 379-393. Munoz, J., E. Anduiza, and A. Gallego (2016). Why do voters forgive corrupt mayors? Implicit exchange, credibility of information and clean alternatives. Local Government Studies 42 (4), 598-615. Pereira, C. and M. A. Melo (2015). Reelecting corrupt incumbents in exchange for public goods: Rouba mas faz in Brazil. Latin American Research Review 50 (4), 88-115. Peterman, W. B. (2013). Determining the motives for a positive optimal tax on capital. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37 (1), 265-295. Rieger, M. O., M. Wang, and T. Hens (2014). Risk preferences around the world. Management Science 61 (3), 637-648. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2007). International handbook on the economics of corruption. Edward Elgar Publishing. Sarkar, S. and G. R. Zodrow (1993). Transitional issues in moving to a direct consumption tax. National Tax Journal 46 (3), 359-376. Schleiter, P. and A. M. Voznaya (2014). Party system competitiveness and corruption. Party Politics 20 (5), 675-686. Shapiro, S. S. and M. B. Wilk (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52 (3/4), 591-611. Singer, M. M. (2013). The global economic crisis and domestic political agendas. Electoral Studies 32 (3), 404-410. Sung, H.-E. (2004). Democracy and political corruption: A cross-national comparison. Crime, Law and Social Change 41 (2), 179-193. Van Groezen, B., H. Kiiver, and B. Unger (2009). Explaining Europeans' preferences for pension provision. European Journal of Political Economy 25 (2), 237-246. Vis, B. (2009). Governments and unpopular social policy reform: Biting the bullet or steering clear? European Journal of Political Research 48 (1), 31-57. Winters, M. S. and R. Weitz-Shapiro (2013). Lacking information or condoning corruption: When do voters support corrupt politicians? Comparative Politics 45 (4), 418-436. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press. Zechmeister, E. J. and D. Zizumbo-Colunga (2013). The varying political toll of concerns about corruption in good versus bad economic times. Comparative Political Studies 46 (10), 1190-1218. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/89581 |