Limits to the «theorem of lemons»: demand for good cars under equilibrium price dispersion

Malakhov, Sergey (2018): Limits to the «theorem of lemons»: demand for good cars under equilibrium price dispersion.

Abstract

The model of equilibrium price dispersion examines the demand for cars through the optics of the demand for mileage where the asymmetry of information is produced by the odometer fraud. Theoretically, fraudsters can destroy the market as it is described by the “theorem of lemons”. But the market self-deactivation does not take place. The purchase of a car with regard to the demand for mileage represents a form of home production where driving like gardening and pets’ care provide a direct utility but is also something one can purchase on the market. At the margin nobody buys but everybody gets taxi. The increase in taxi price per mile raises the demand for good cars of taxi drivers and it makes rational for potential buyers to pay for taxi drivers expertize fee in order to choose a good car. The demand for good cars is restored at the new price level. The pessimistic scenario, however, doesn’t take place because good cars stay attractive. The equilibrium price of a mile establishes the direct relationship between marginal savings on purchase and the time horizon of the consumption-leisure choice. Great discounts provide potential buyers the additional information about short life cycle of vehicles like unexpected low price for beefsteak tells us about its short shelf life. The equilibrium price of a mile describes also the trade-off between the purchase price and the costs of ownership. The marginal approach does not rely on the endowment effect. The choice between a good car and a bad car discovers the willingness to take care of good cars where the after-the-purchase costs of ownership per mile become greater than for a bad car. The willingness to take care of the big-ticket quality items reinforces the willingness to pay of potential buyers, and sellers of good cars do not quit the market. The choice of the mileage as the key attribute with the presentation of the driving as the form of home production moves the marginal analysis towards the attributes’ model of consumption where the general unawareness of potential buyers in the quality of used cars is substituted by more specified uncertainty of mileage to be purchased.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: : theorem of lemons, equilibrium price dispersion, optimal consumption-leisure choce, willingness to take care of big-ticket items
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness

References

1.Aguiar M., Hurst E. (2007) ‘Measuring Trends in Leisure: The Allocation of Time over Five Decades’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 969-1006.

2.Akerlof, G. (1970) ‘The Market for “lemons”’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3), 488-500.

3.Anderson, W. (2001) ‘“lemon”s and the Nobel Prize’, Mises Daily Articles 10/11/2001, Mises Institute,

4.CECF-EU (2018), ‘”Car-Pass” or how to be sure of a vehicle’s mileage’, CECF-EU Report March 2018.

5.Cooper, P (2007) ‘Knowing Your lemons’: quality uncertainty in UK higher education’, Quality in Higher Education, 13 (1), 19-29.

6.Grewal D., Marmorstein, H. (1994) ‘Market Price Variation, Perceived Price Variation, and Consumers’ Price Search Decisions for Durable Goods.’ Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (3), 453-460.

7.Jerome, K.J. ‘Three men in a boat (to say nothing of the dog)’ Bristol: J.W.Arrowsmith. London: Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent & Co., Limited, 1889.

8.Kapteyn A., Wansbeek T., Buyze J. 1979. ‘Maximizing or Satisficing’ The Review of Economics and Statistics,Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 549-563.

9.Katz, A. (2007) ‘Pharmaceutical lemons: innovation and regulation in drug industry’, Michigan Telecommunication and Technology Law Review, 14 (1), 1-41.

10.Lancaster, K.J. (1966) ‘A New Approach to Consumer Theory.’ Journal of Political Economy, 74, April, 132-157.

11.Lea, S.G, Tarpy, R.M., Webley, P.M. (1987) ‘The Individual in the Economy: a textbook of economic psychology’, Camridge University Press,

12.Meyer, R. J. (2004). ‘The Psychology of Dynamic Product Maintenance’, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from hpps://repository.upenn.edu/ marketing_papers/327

13.Malakhov, S. (2014) ‘Satisficing Decision Procedure and Optimal Consumption-Leisure Choice.’ International Journal of Social Science Research, 2 (2), 138-151 (http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v2i2.6158)

14.Malakhov, S. (2015) ‘Propensity to Search: common, leisure, and labor models of behavior’, Expert Journal of Economics, 3(1),63-76 (http://economics.expertjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/EJE_308malakhov63-76.pdf)

15.Malakhov, S. (2016) ‘Law of One Price and Optimal Consumption-Leisure Choice under price Dispersion’, Expert Journal of Economics, 4 (1),1-8 (http://economics.expertjournals.com/23597704-401/)

16.Malakhov, S. (2017) ‘Moral Hazard, Optimal Health-seeking Behavior, and Competitive Equilibrium’,Expert Journal of Economics, 5 (2), 71 -79 (http://economics.expertjournals.com/23597704-509/)

17.Malakhov, S. (2018) ‘Propensity to Search and Income Elasticity of Demand: does the equilibrium really exists?’, Expert Journal of Economics, 6 (1), 15-25 (http://economics.expertjournals.com/23597704-602/)

18.Stigler, G. (1961) ‘The Economics of Information’, Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213-225.

18.Thaler, R. (1980) ‘Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.

19.Thaler, R. (1987) ‘The Psychology of Choice and the Assumptions of Economics’ in Roth, A.E. ‘Laboratory experimentation in economics: six points of view’ Cambridge University Press, 99-130.

20.Whytcross, D. (2015) ‘Car Wash and Detailing Services in Australia’ IBISWorld Industry Report OD5235.