Theories of Governance and Development: How Does India’s Experience Fit?

Singh, Nirvikar (2019): Theories of Governance and Development: How Does India’s Experience Fit?

Abstract

This paper takes on the apparent paradox of India’s combination of durable democracy, capable bureaucracy, but a deficient development trajectory. It begins by outlining the nature of the problem. Then it summarizes and compares some significant approaches to drawing connections from governance institutions to development outcomes. Next, it reviews some of the contributions to understanding India’s political economy in the last few decades. Finally, it attempts to draw some lessons from India’s experience for the application of different theories of governance and development. The central lesson is that the paradox recedes when attention is paid to the subnational level, where India’s states encompass considerable variation in initial societal and economic conditions and in development outcomes.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: democracy, embedded autonomy, governance, limited access orders, India, inclusive institutions, political economy
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P26 - Political Economy ; Property Rights

References

Acemoglu, D. and J. Robinson (2012), Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, New York: Crown Business Books.

Acemoglu, D., D. Ticchi, and A. Vindigni (2011), Emergence and Persistence of Inefficient States, Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(2), 177–208.

Amsden, A. (1989), Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bardhan, P. (1998 [1984]), The Political Economy of Development in India (Expanded Edition), New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Bardhan, P. (2015), Reflections on Indian political economy, Economic and Political Weekly, 50 (18).

Bardhan, P. (2016), State and Development: The Need for a Reappraisal of the Current Literature, Journal of Economic Literature, 54(3), 862–892.

Besley, T. and T. Persson (2009), The Origins of State Capacity: Property Rights, Taxation, and Politics, American Economic Review, 99, 1218–1244.

Bhagwati, J. (1982), Directly Unproductive, Profit Seeking (DUP) Activities, Journal of Political Economy, 90 (5), 988-1002.

Bhagwati, J. and A. Panagariya (2013), Why Growth Matters: How Economic Growth in India Reduced Poverty and the Lessons for Other Developing Countries, New York, NY: Public Affairs.

Boldrin, M., D.K. Levine and S. Modica (2012), A Review of Acemoglu and Robinson’s Why Nations Fail, www.dklevine.com/general/aandrreview.pdf, accessed October 27, 2018.

Drèze, J. and A. K. Sen (2013), An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Evans, P. (1995), Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Evans, P. (2010). The Challenge of 21st Century Development: Building Capability-Enhancing States, Global Event Working Paper, ‘Capacity is Development’ program, New York: United Nations Development Program.

Evans, P. and P. Heller (2018), The State and Development, WIDER Working Paper 2018/112, Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.

Frankel, F. (1979), India’s Political Economy, 1947–1977: The Gradual Revolution, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Gray, H. (2015), Access orders and the 'new' new institutional economics of development, Development and Change, 47 (1), 51-75.

Herring, R. (1983), Land to the Tiller: The Political Economy of Agrarian Reform in South Asia, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Horie, Y. (1937), The Economic Significance of the Meiji Restoration, Kyoto University Economic Review, 12 (2), 63-81.

Johnson, C. (1982), MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Joshi, V. (2017), India’s Long Road: The Search for Prosperity, New York: Oxford University Press.

Kang, D. C. (2002), Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Khan, M. H. (1995), State Failure in Weak States: A Critique of New Institutionalist Explanations, in Harriss, J., J. Hunter and C. M. Lewis (eds.) The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development, London: Routledge, 71-86.

Khan, M. H. (2010), Political Settlements and the Governance of Growth-Enhancing Institutions, unpublished working paper, https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/9968/, accessed October 27, 2018.

Kohli, A. (1987), The State and Poverty in India: The Politics of Reform, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kohli, A. (1990), Democracy and Discontent: India’s Growing Crisis of Governability, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kohli, A. (2006a), Politics of Economic Growth in India, 1980-2005, Part I: The 1980s, Economic and Political Weekly, 41 (13), 1251-1259.

Kohli, A. (2006b), Politics of Economic Growth in India, 1980-2005, Part II: The 1990s and Beyond, Economic and Political Weekly, 41 (14), 1361-1370.

Kotwal, A., and A. Roy Chaudhuri (2015), What Will Improve Governance?, India Review, 14 (1), 43-57.

Loriaux, M. (1999), The French Developmental State as Myth and Moral Ambition, in M. Woo-Cummings (ed.), The Developmental State, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 235-275.

Mangla, A. (2015), Bureaucratic Norms and State Capacity in India: Implementing Primary Education in the Himalayan Region, Asian Survey, 55 (5), 882-908.

Mishra, P. (1995), Butter Chicken in Ludhiana: Travels in Small Town India, New Delhi: Penguin Books.

Myrdal, G. (1968), Asian Drama, An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations, 3 vols., New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

North, D. C., J. J. Wallis and B. R. Weingast (2009), Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Panagariya, A. (2008), India: The Emerging Giant, New York: Oxford University Press.

Rajan, R.G. (2009), Rent Preservation and the Persistence of Underdevelopment, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1(1), 178-218.

Rao, M.G. and N. Singh (2005), The Political Economy of Indian Federalism, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Routley, L. (2012), Developmental states: a review of the literature, ESID Working Paper 03, Effective States and Inclusive Development Research Centre (ESID), School of Environment and Development, The University of Manchester, UK, February.

Roy, P. (2013), India’s Vulnerable Maturity: Experiences of Maharashtra and West Bengal, in eds., North, D.C., J. J. Wallis, S. B. Webb and B. R. Weingast, In the Shadow of Violence: Politics, Economics, and the Problems of Development, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 198-232.

Rudolph, L. and S. Rudolph (1987), In Pursuit of Lakshmi: The Political Economy of the Indian State, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Singh, N. (2007), Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization in India, World Bank background paper, September, available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1282267.

Singh, N. (2016), Breaking the Mould: Thoughts on Punjab's Future Economic Development, in eds., L. Singh and N. Singh, Economic Transformation of a Developing Economy: The Experience of Punjab, India, Singapore: Springer, pp. 451-456.

Singh, N. (2018), Holding India Together: The Role of Institutions of Federalism, in eds. A. Mishra and T. Ray, Markets, Governance and Institutions in the Process of Economic Development, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 300-323.

Sinha, A. (2005), The Regional Roots of Developmental Politics in India: A Divided Leviathan, Bloomington, IN: Indian University Press.

Sinha, A. (2016), A Distinctive Indian Political Economy: New Concepts and a Synthesizing Framework, Studies in Indian Politics, 4(2) 266–273.

Skaperdas, S. (1992), Cooperation, Conflict, and Power in the Absence of Property Rights, American Economic Review, 82(4), 720-739.

Subramanian, A. (2013), Which Nations Failed? Business Standard, January 21, https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/arvind-subramanian-which-nations-failed-112111300077_1.html, accessed October 28, 2018.

Wade, R. (1990), Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in Taiwan’s Industrialization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

You, J.-S. (2005), Embedded autonomy or crony capitalism? Explaining corruption in South Korea, relative to Taiwan and the Philippines, focusing on the role of land reform and industrial policy, paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September, citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.464.8265, accessed October 27, 2018.