Pompei, Fabrizio and Damiani, Mirella and Andrea, Ricci (2018): Family firms, performance-related pay and the great crisis: evidence from the Italian case. Published in: Industrial and Corporate Change (6 December 2018)
PDF
MPRA_paper_91301.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
This article analyses how Italian family firms (FFs) have acted during the global great crisis in comparison to their nonfamily counterparts using a sample of almost 4500 firms for 2007 and 2010. We study whether family control affects labor productivity, labor costs, and competitiveness and how family and nonfamily firm (NFFs) have responded to the great crisis. Furthermore, we test whether the adoption of performance-related pay (PRP) for employees offers an efficacious strategy to mitigate the effects of the crisis. Quantile regression techniques have been used to test the heterogeneous role of PRP, and its possible endogeneity has been taken into account in the empirical investigation. After the outbreak of the crisis, the distance in terms of the competitiveness of FFs in relation to their nonfamily counterparts increased. However, we also find that FFs may take advantage of the adoption of incentive schemes, such as PRP, to encourage commitment and motivation from their employees more than NFFs do. The positive role of PRP on labor productivity, coupled with a moderate influence of these schemes on wage premiums, enables them to regain competitiveness. In addition, for FFs located in industrial districts in which social rules prevail on formal rules, the adoption of PRP has exerted additional positive effects under hostile pressures, such as those characterizing the strong global crisis.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Family firms, performance-related pay and the great crisis: evidence from the Italian case |
English Title: | Family firms, performance-related pay and the great crisis: evidence from the Italian case |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Family firms, performance-related pay, quantile regressions, productivity |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J33 - Compensation Packages ; Payment Methods |
Item ID: | 91301 |
Depositing User: | dr Fabrizio Pompei |
Date Deposited: | 09 Jan 2019 20:06 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 05:16 |
References: | References Abadie, A. J. Angrist, and G. Imbens (2002). ‘Instrumental Variables Estimates of the Effect of Subsidized Training on the Quantiles of Trainee Earnings’, Econometrica, 70 (1), 91-117. Amemiya, T. (1982). Two stage least absolute deviations estimators. Econometrica, 50, 689-711. Anderson, R. C., and Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. Arias, O., K. Hallock, and W. Sosa-Escudero (2001). Individual Heterogeneity in the Returns to Schooling: Instrumental Variables Quantile Regression Using Twins Data, Empirical Economics 26(1), 7–40. Arrègle, J.-L., Hitt, M., Sirmon, D., and Véry, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95. Barbera, F., and K. Moores (2013). ‘Firm Ownership and Productivity: A Study of Family and Non Family SMEs,’ Small Business Economics, 40, 953–976. Barth, E., Gulbrandsen, T., and Schønea, P. (2005). Family ownership and productivity: The role of owner-management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1), 107-127. Bassanini, A., Breda, T., Caroli, E., and Reberioux, A. (2013). Working in family firms: Paid less but more secure? Evidence from French matched employer-employee data. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 66, 433–466. Bauweraerts, J. (2013). How Do Private Family Firms Face the Crisis? Empirical Evidence from Belgium. International Business Research, 6(8), 91. Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial district and inter-firm cooperation in Italy (pp. 37–51). Geneva:International Institute for Labour Studies. Becattini, G. (2002). From Marshall’s to the Italian “Industrial districts”. A brief critical reconstruction. In Complexity and industrial clusters (pp. 83-106). Physica-Verlag HD. Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Industrial and corporate change, 13(4), 643-678. Bennedsen, M., Perez-Gonzalez, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2010). The governance of family firms. In K.H. Baker & R. Anderson (Eds.), Corporate governance: A synthesis of theory, research, and practice Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 371–389. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., and Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279 Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2014). Family-controlled firms and stakeholder management: A socioemotional wealth preservation perspective. The Sage handbook of family business, 179-195. Bertrand, M., and A. Schoar (2006). ‘The Role of Family in Family Firms,’ Journal of Economic Perspective 20(2), 73–96. Block, J.H. (2010). Family management, family ownership, and downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 firms. Family Business Review, 23(2), 109–130. Bloom, N (2009). The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks, Econometrica 77(3), 623–685. Bloom, N. and J. Van Reenen (2007). ‘Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms And Countries’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1351-1408. Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2011). Human resource management and productivity.in Fortin, N., Lemieux, T., Firpo, S., Ashenfelter, O., & Card, D. (eds). Handbook of labor economics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 4, 1697-1767. Boeri, T. (1996). Is job turnover countercyclical?. Journal of Labor Economics, 14(4), 603-625. Bosio G. (2009). ‘Temporary Employment and Wage Gap with Permanent Jobs: Evidence from Quantile Regression’, MPRA, Paper 1605. Brusco, S. (1982). The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 68(2), 167–84. Bubolz, M. (2001). ‘Family as source, user, and builder of social capital’. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 129–31. Bugamelli, M. et al. (2018). Productivity growth in Italy: a tale of a slow-motion change, Occasional Papers n.422, Bank of Italy. Cameron, C. and Trivedi, P.T. (2010), Microeconometrics Using Stata, Revised Edition, Texas: Statacorp LP College Station. Canay, I. (2011). A Simple Approach to Quantile Regression for Panel Data, The Econometrics Journal, 14 (3): 368-386. Caselli, F., & Gennaioli, N. (2013). Dynastic management. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 971-996. Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez‐Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional Wealth and Proactive Stakeholder Engagement: Why Family‐Controlled Firms Care More About Their Stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1153-1173. Chernozhukov V. and Hansen, C. (2005), An IV Model of Quantile Treatment Effect, Econometrica, 73, 1, 245-261. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L. P., and Rau, S. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1103-1113. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cruz, C. Firfiray S. and Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2011). Socioemotional Wealth and Human Resource Management (HRM) in Family-Controlled Firms, in Aparna Joshi, Hui Liao, Joseph J. Martocchio (ed.) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 30, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 159 – 217 Davis, J. H., Allen, M. R., and Hayes, H. D. (2010). Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 1093–1116. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., and Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20-47. Davis, S. J., & Haltiwanger, J. (1992). Gross job creation, gross job destruction, and employment reallocation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 819-863. D’Amuri, F., Fabiani, S., Sabbatini, R., Polcini, R. T., Venditti, F., Viviano, E., & Zizza, R. (2013). Wages and prices in Italy during the crisis: the firms’ perspective (No. 289). Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area D'Amuri, F., & Giorgiantionio, C. (2015). Stato dell'arte e prospettive della contrattazione aziendale in Italia. Diritto delle relazioni industriali, 25(2), 297-341. D'Aurizio, L., and Romano, L. (2013). Family firms and the Great Recession: out of sight, out of mind?. Bank of Italy, Working Papers, No. 905. Dei Ottati, G. (2017). Marshallian Industrial Districts in Italy: the end of a model or adaptation to the global economy?. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(2), 259-284. Demsetz, H., and Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1155-1177. Devicienti, F. Naticcioni, P. and Ricci, A. (2018). Temporary employment, demand volatility and unions: firm-level evidence, with Paolo Naticchioni and Andrea Ricci, Industrial and Labor Relation Review, 71(1), 2018. Dosi, G., Grazzi, M., Tomasi, C., & Zeli, A. (2012). Turbulence underneath the big calm? The micro-evidence behind Italian productivity dynamics. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 1043-1067. EIRO (1997), Flessibilità del lavoro e contrattazione aziendale, European Industrial Relations Observatory (EIRO), downloaded on January, 20, 2016. Firfiray, S., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2016). The labor productivity of family firms: a socioemotional wealth perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming) Frolich, M., and B. Melly (2010). Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effect with Stata, Stata Journal 10(3), 423–457. Frolich, M., and B. Melly (2013). Unconditional Quantile Treatment Effects Under Endogeneity, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 31(3), 346–357. Gómez-Mejía et al., (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills, Administrative science quarterly 52(1): 106-137. Hartley, J., Jacobson, D., Klandermans, B., and van Vuuren, T. (1991). Job insecurity: Coping with jobs at risk. London: Sage. Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., Sarathy, R., and Murphy, F. (2012). Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 85-101. Koenker, R., & Bassett Jr, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46,33-50. Kräkel, M., & Nieken, P. (2015). Relative performance pay in the shadow of crisis. European Economic Review, 74, 244-268. Lazear, E. P. (2000). Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, 90, 1346-1361. Le Breton‐Miller, L., and Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out‐compete? Governance, long‐term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(6), 731-746. Lins, K. V., Volpin, P., & Wagner, H. F. (2013). Does family control matter? International evidence from the 2008–2009 financial crisis. Review of Financial Studies, 26(10), 2583-2619. Martikainen, M., J. Nikkinen, and S. Vahamaa (2009). ‘Production Functions and Productivity of Family Firms: Evidence from the S&P500,’ The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49, 295–307. Melly, B. (2005), Decomposition of differences in distribution using quantile regression. Labour economics, 12, 577-590. Muscio, A., and Scarpinato, M. (2007). Employment and wage dynamics in Italian industrial districts. Regional Studies, 41(6), 765-777. Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S.(1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of management review 23(2): 242-266. Naldi, L., Cennamo, C., Corbetta, G., and Gomez‐Mejia, L. (2013). Preserving socioemotional wealth in family firms: Asset or liability? The moderating role of business context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1341-1360. Neckebrouck, J., Schulze, W., and Zellweger, T. (2017), Are family firms good employers?. Academy of Management Journal, doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0765, in press. Pittino, D., Martínez, A. B., Chirico, F., & Galván, R. S. (2018). Psychological ownership, knowledge sharing and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: The moderating role of governance heterogeneity. Journal of Business Research, 84, 312-326. Prendergast, C. (1999). The Provision of Incentives in Firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3): 7-63. Shukla, P. P., Carney, M., & Gedajlovic, E. (2014). Economic theories of family firms. The Sage handbook of family business, 100-118. Sverke, M., Hellgren, J. and Näswall, K. (2002): No Security: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Job Insecurity and Its Consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 242—264. Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., and Winter, S. (1994).Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 23(1), 1–30. Westhead, P., and Howorth, C. (2006). Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review, 19(4), 301-316. Wooldrige, J.M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge:MA: MIT Press. Zwick, T. (2004), “Employee participation and productivity”, Labour Economics, 11, 715– 740. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/91301 |