Damiani, Mirella and Pompei, Fabrizio and Ricci, Andrea (2018): The role of employee incentive pay in the competitiveness of family and non-family firms. Published in: Economia Politica (15 November 2018)
PDF
MPRA_paper_91303.pdf Download (692kB) |
Abstract
Insufficient attention has been paid to the different roles of wage incentives in the competitiveness of family and non-family firms. This paper addresses this issue and uses a sample of listed and non-listed Italian firms for 2007 and 2010 to show that family firms that adopt incentive wages obtain greater gains in competitiveness with respect to non-family firms. Unlike what occurs in non-family firms, the efficiency enhancing effect of incentive wages more than compensates for the premiums paid to employees and enables family firms to achieve significant gains in terms of competitiveness.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The role of employee incentive pay in the competitiveness of family and non-family firms |
English Title: | The role of employee incentive pay in the competitiveness of family and non-family firms |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Family firms Performance-related pay Labour productivity Wages Competitiveness |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J33 - Compensation Packages ; Payment Methods |
Item ID: | 91303 |
Depositing User: | dr Fabrizio Pompei |
Date Deposited: | 09 Jan 2019 19:59 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 12:35 |
References: | Abadie, A., Angrist, J. & Imbens, G. (2002). Instrumental Variables Estimates of the Effect of Subsidized Training on the Quantiles of Trainee Earnings, Econometrica, 70, (1): 91-117. Amemya, T.(1982). Two Stage Least Absolute Deviation Estimators. Econometrica, 50(3): 689-711. Amit, R., & Villalonga, B. (2014). Financial performance of family firms. The SAGE Handbook of family business, 157-178. Anderson, R.C. & Reeb, D.M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P500, Journal of Finance, 58(3): 1301– 1328. Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of management studies, 44(1): 73-95. Astrachan, J. H., Klein, S. B., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2002). The F‐PEC scale of family influence: a proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family business review, 15(1): 45-58. Baker, G. P. (1992). Incentive contracts and performance measurement. Journal of Political economy, 598-614. Bugamelli, M., Cannari, L., Lotti, F., & Magri, S. (2012). Il gap innovativo del sistema produttivo italiano: radici e possibili rimedi. Temi di Discussione, Banca d’Italia, n.121. Bammens, Y. Notelaers, G. & Van Gils, A. (2015). Employment for Employees Innovative Work Involvement, Family Business Review, 28(2): 123–144. Barbera, F., & K. Moores (2013). Firm Ownership and Productivity: A Study of Family and Non Family SMEs, Small Business Economics, 40(4): 953–976. Barth, E., Gulbrandsen, T. & Schøne, P. (2005), ‘Family ownership and productivity: the role of owner-management’, Journal of Corporate Finance,11 (1): 107– 127 Bassanini, A., Breda, T., Caroli, E., & Rebérioux, A. (2013). Working in family firms: Paid less but more secure? Evidence from French matched employer-employee data. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 66(2): 433-466. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3): 258-279. Block, J. (2010), Family Management, Family Ownership, and Downsizing: Evidence From S&P 500 Firms, Family Business Review 23(2): 109 –13. Bloom, N. (2009). The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica, 77(3): 623-685. Bloom, N. & J. Van Reenen (2007). ‘Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms And Countries’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4): 1351-1408. Canay, I. (2011). A Simple Approach to Quantile Regression for Panel Data, The Econometrics Journal, 14 (3): 368-386. Carrasco‐Hernandez, A., & Sánchez‐Marín, G. (2007). The determinants of employee compensation in family firms: empirical evidence. Family business review, 20(3), 215-228. Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez‐Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional Wealth and Proactive Stakeholder Engagement: Why Family‐Controlled Firms Care More About Their Stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6): 1153-1173. Chernozhukov V. and Hansen, C. (2005). An IV Model of Quantile Treatment Effect. Econometrica, 73 (1): 245-261. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H. & Litz, R. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non‐family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice 28(4): 335-354. Cruz, C. Firfiray S. & Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2011). Socioemotional Wealth and Human Resource Management (HRM) in Family-Controlled Firms, in Aparna Joshi, Hui Liao, Joseph J. Martocchio (ed.) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Volume 30) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.159 – 217 Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. (2004). Self‐serving or self‐actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non‐family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,28(4): 355-362. Davis, J.H, Schoorman, F.D. & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Accademy of Management Review, 22(1): 20-47 Evert, R. E., Martin, J. A., McLeod, M. S., & Payne, G. T. (2016). Empirics in Family Business Research Progress, Challenges, and the Path Ahead. Family Business Review, 29(1):17-43. Firfiray, S., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2016). The labor productivity of family firms: a socioemotional wealth perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Frölich M. and Melly, B. (2010). Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effect with Stata. The Stata Journal, 10 (3): pp. 423-457. Frölich M. and Melly, B. (2013). Unconditional Quantile Treatment Effects Under Endogeneity. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 31 (3): 346-357. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Nunez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, L. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1): 81-96. Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative science quarterly, 52(1): 106-137. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The academy of management annals, 5(1): 653-707. Hölmstrom, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. The Bell journal of economics, 10(1): 74-91. Koch, M. J., & McGrath, R. G. (1996). Improving labor productivity: Human resource management policies do matter. Strategic management journal, 17(5): 335-354. Koenker, R., & Bassett Jr, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 46(1): 33-50. La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The journal of finance, 54(2): 471-517. Lazear, E. P. (2000). The power of incentives. The American Economic Review,90(2): 410-414. Lazear, E. P., & Oyer, P. (2012). Personnel Economics. in: R. Gibbons and J. Roberts. Handbook of Organizational Economics. Madison, K., Holt, D. T., Kellermanns, F. W., & Ranft, A. L. (2016). Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories. Family Business Review, 29(1):65-93. Melly, B. (2004). Public and private sector wage distributions controlling for endogenous sector choice. Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economic Research. Mimeo. Miller, D., Breton‐Miller, L., & Lester, R. H. (2010). Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly‐traded companies. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2): 201-223. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run. Lessons in Competitive Advantage from Great Family Business, Cambridge MA. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S.(1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of management review 23(2): 242-266. Prendergast, C. (1999). The Provision of Incentives in Firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3): 7-63. Reid, R. S., & Adams, J. S. (2001). Human resource management-a survey of practices within family and non-family firms. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(6): 310-320. Stavrou, E. T., & Swiercz, P. M. (1998). Securing the future of the family enterprise: A model of offspring intentions to join the business. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 19-21. Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family business review, 17(1): 1-36. Sharma, P., James J. Chrisman, J.J. and Kelin E. Gersick. K. E. (2012). 25 years of family business review: Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review, 25(1): 5. Shukla, P. P., Carney, M., & Gedajlovic, E. (2014). Economic theories of family firms. The SAGE Handbook of Family Business, 100-119. Sraer, D. and Thesmar, D. (2007). Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of the European Economic Association 5.4: 709-751. Werner,1 S, . Henry L. Tosi, H. L. And Luis Gomez-Mejia, L. (2005). Organizational Governance and Employee Pay: How Ownership Structure Affects The Firm’s Compensation Strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 26(4): 377–384 (2005). Westhead, P., and Howorth, C. (2006). Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review, 19(4), 301-316. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/91303 |