Moore, Rachel and Pecoraro, Brandon (2019): Modeling the Internal Revenue Code in a heterogeneous-agent framework: An application to TCJA.
PDF
MPRA_paper_93110.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Macroeconomic models used for tax policy analysis often simultaneously abstract from two features of the US tax code: special tax treatment for preferential capital income, and the joint tax treatment of ordinary capital and labor income. In this paper, we explore the extent to which explicitly accounting for these tax details has macroeconomic implications within a heterogeneous-agent model. We do this by expanding the Moore and Pecoraro (2018) overlapping generations model to include distinct corporate and non-corporate firms so that the business income distributed to households can be separated into ordinary and preferred capital income. Household income tax treatment is then determined by an internal tax calculator that fully accounts for interaction among income bases while conditioning on idiosyncratic household characteristics. Relative to a conventional approach where household income taxation is determined by independent labor and capital income tax functions that do not distinguish between ordinary and preferred capital income, we find that our innovations have implications for household behavior and economic aggregates - especially the tax consequences of changes to the returns to labor and capital - when analyzing a subset of tax provisions from the recently enacted “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”. Our findings imply that the abstracting from tax detail may come at the expense of correctly accounting for incentives and estimating macroeconomic responses to tax policy changes.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Modeling the Internal Revenue Code in a heterogeneous-agent framework: An application to TCJA |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | dynamic scoring; tax policy modeling; heterogeneous agents |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General |
Item ID: | 93110 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Brandon Pecoraro |
Date Deposited: | 08 Apr 2019 12:27 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 11:12 |
References: | Bénabou, R. (2002). Tax and education policy in a heterogeneous-agent economy: What levels of redistribution maximize growth and effciency. Econometrica 70 (2), 481-517. Cassou, S. P. and K. J. Lansing (1998). Optimal fiscal policy, public capital, and the productivity slowdown. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 22, 991-935. Cho, S.-W. and J. L. Francis (2011). Tax treatment of owner occupied housing and wealth inequality. Journal of Macroeconomics 33, 42-60. DeBacker, J., R. W. Evans, and K. L. Phillips (2019). Integrating microsimulation models of tax policy into a dge macroeconomic model. Public Finance Review 47 (2), 207-275 Easterly, W. and S. Rebelo (1993). Marginal income tax rates and economic growth in developing countries. European Economic Review 37, 409-417. Fernánez-Villaverde, J. and D. Krueger (2010). Consumption and saving over the life cycle: How important are consumer durables? Macroeconomic Dynamics 15. Gamber, E. and J. Seliski (2019). The effect of government debt on interest rates. Congressional Budget Office Working Paper. Gervais, M. (2002). Housing taxation and capital accumulation. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 1461-1489. Gouveia, M. and R. P. Struass (1994). Effective federal income tax functions: An exploratory empirical analysis. National Tax Journal 47 (2), 317-39. Guner, N., R. Kaygusuz, and G. Ventura (2011). Taxation and household labour supply. The Review of Economic Studies 79 (3), 1113-1149. Guner, N., R. Kaygusuz, and G. Ventura (2014). Income taxation of u.s. households: Facts and parametric estimates. Review of Economic Dynamics 17 (4), 559-581. Heathcote, J., K. Storesletten, and G. L. Violante (2017). Optimal tax progressivity: An analytical framework. Quarterly Journal of Economics 132 (4), 1693-1754. Holter, H. A., D. Krueger, and S. Stepanchuk (2019). How does tax progessivity and household heterogeneity affect laffer curves? Quantitative Economics (Forthcoming) Hotz, V. J. and R. A. Miller (1988). An empirical analysis of life cycle fertility and female labor supply. Econometrica 56 (1), 91-118. Hubbard, R., A. Kashyap, and T. Whited (1995). International finance and firm investment. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27 (3), 683-701. Huntley, J. (2014). The long-run effects of federal budget deficits on national saving and private domestic investment. Congressional Budget Office Working Paper. JCT (2011). Joint committee on taxation: Summary of economic models and estimating practices of the staff of the joint committee on taxation. JCX-46-11. JCT (2015). Joint committee on taxation: Estimating changes in the federal individual income tax: Description of the individual tax model. JCX-75-15. JCT (2017). Estimated budget effects of the conference agreement for H.R. 1, The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act". JCX-67-17. Kitao, S. (2010). Labor-dependent capital income taxation. Journal of Monetary Economics 57, 959-974. Krueger, D. and A. Ludwig (2016). On the optimal provision of social insurance: Progressive taxation versus education subsidies in general equilibrium. Journal of Monetary Economics 77, 72-98. Lansing, K. J. (1998). Optimal fiscal policy in a business cycle model with public capital. The Canadian Journal of Economics 31 (2), 337-364. Li, W. and P.-D. Sarte (2004). Progressive taxation and long-run growth. American Economic Review 95 (5), 1705-1716. Lynde, C. and J. Richmond (1992). The role of public capital in production. The Review of Economics and Statistics 74 (1), 37-44. Moore, R. and B. Pecoraro (2018a). Dynamic scoring: An assessment of fiscal closing assumptions. Working Paper. Moore, R. and B. Pecoraro (2018b). Macroeconomic implications of modeling the internal revenue code in a heterogeneous-agent framework. Working Paper. Nishiyama, S. (2015). Fiscal policy effects in a heterogeneous-agent OLG economy with an aging population. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 61, 114-132. Poterba, J. and L. Summers (1984). The economic effects of dividend taxation. NBER Working Papers 1353, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Zodrow, G. and J. W. Diamond (2013). Dynamic overlapping generations computable general equilibrium models and the analysis of tax policy: The diamond-zodrow model. Volume 1, Chapter 11, pp. 743-813. Elsevier. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93110 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Modeling the Internal Revenue Code in a heterogeneous-agent framework: An application to TCJA. (deposited 08 Apr 2019 12:27) [Currently Displayed]