Testing an Information Intervention: Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Jamie Oliver on Fizzy Drinks Demand

Gibson, John and Tucker, Steven and Boe-Gibson, Geua (2019): Testing an Information Intervention: Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Jamie Oliver on Fizzy Drinks Demand.

Abstract

We conducted a salient purchasing experiment to test if an information intervention alters fizzy drinks demand. Subjects in our experiment initially made five rounds of purchases, for 14 items (energy drinks, colas, and lemonades) selected from a stratified sample of retailers. Subjects faced seven pricing environments, reflecting baseline prices, two ad valorem taxes, two specific taxes, and ad valorem and specific price cuts to reflect retailer discounting. Subjects then watched a video presentation by celebrity chef Jamie Oliver, which highlighted adverse health effects of sugary drinks. The five rounds of choices were then repeated, to generate within-subject before and after demands that show an overall 25% reduction in purchases due to the information intervention. Demand for one sugar-free option, Diet Coke, rose 36% after the intervention. The impacts under baseline prices were little different to those seen in conjunction with tax-induced price rises. Effects of the information intervention were larger for females, for the young, for the less educated, for those usually spending more on soft drinks, and for those who usually ignore sugar content when making purchases.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Experiment; Health; Information; Jamie Oliver; Soda taxes; Sugar
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health

References

Andalón, M., Gibson, J. 2018. The ‘soda tax’ is unlikely to make Mexicans lighter or healthier: New evidence on biases in elasticities of demand for soda. MPRA Paper No. 86370.

Baker, P., Jones, A., Thow, A. 2017. Accelerating the worldwide adoption of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: Strengthening commitment and capacity. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 6(1): 1-5.

Billich, N., Blake, M., Backholer, K., Cobcroft, M., Li, V., Peeters, A. 2018. The effect of sugar-sweetened beverage front-of-pack labels on drink selection, health knowledge and awareness: An online randomised controlled trial. Appetite 128(1): 233-241.

Bleich, S., Barry, C., Gary-Webb, T., Herring, B. 2014. Reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption by providing caloric information. American Journal of Public Health 104(12): 2417-2424.

Bollard T, Maubach N, Walker N, Mhurchu C. 2016. Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people’s predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: an experimental study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 13(1): 1-7.

Epstein, L., Finkelstein, E., Katz, D., Jankowiak, N., Pudlewski, C., Paluch, R. 2016. Effects of nutrient profiling and price changes based on NuVal® scores on food purchasing in an online experimental supermarket. Public Health Nutrition 19(12): 2157-2164.

Epstein, L., Jankowiak, N., Nederkoorn, C., Raynor, H., French, S., Finkelstein, E. 2012. Experimental research on the relation between food price changes and food-purchasing patterns: A targeted review. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 95(4): 789-809.

Fischer, A., 2014. Some comments on “Taxes, Subsidies, and Advertising Efficacy in Changing Eating Behavior: An Experimental Study”. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 36(4): 717-721.

Galizzi, M., Wiesen, D. 2017. Behavioral experiments in health: An introduction. Health Economics 26(S3): 3-5.

Gibson, J., Romeo, A. 2017. Fiscal‐food policies are likely misinformed by biased price elasticities from household surveys: Evidence from Melanesia. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 4(3): 405-416.

Gibson, J., Tucker, S., 2018. Quality, quantity, and price: Experimental evidence on taxing soft drinks. Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Waikato.

Giesen, J., Payne, C., Havermans, R., Jansen, A. 2011. Exploring how calorie information and taxes on high-calorie foods influence lunch decisions. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 93(4): 689–694

Hammond, D. 2011. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tobacco Control 20(5): 327-337.

Horgen, K., Brownell, K. 2002. Comparison of price change and health message interventions in promoting healthy food choices. Health Psychology 21(5): 505-512.

Michels, K., Bloom, B., Riccardi, P., Rosner, B., Willett, W. 2008. A study of the importance of education and cost incentives on individual food choices at the Harvard School of Public Health cafeteria. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 27(1): 6-11.

Sharma, A., Hauck, K., Hollingsworth, B., Siciliani, L. 2014. The effects of taxing sugar‐sweetened beverages across different income groups. Health Economics 23(9): 1159 1184.

Streletskaya, N., Rusmevichientong, P., Amatyakul, W., Kaiser, H. 2014. Taxes, subsidies, and advertising efficacy in changing eating behavior: An experimental study. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 36(1): 146–174.

Taylor, R., Kaplan, S., Villas-Boas, S., Jung, K. 2019. Soda wars: The effect of a soda tax election on university beverage sales. Economic Inquiry doi: 10.1111/ecin.12776

Velema, E., Vyth, E., Steenhuis, I. 2017. Using nudging and social marketing techniques to create healthy worksite cafeterias in the Netherlands: intervention development and study design. BMC Public Health 17(1):63.

Wang, E. 2015.The impact of soda taxes on consumer welfare: implications of storability and taste heterogeneity. RAND Journal of Economics 46(2): 409-441.

Wilson, A., Buckley, E., Buckley, J., Bogomolova, S. 2016. Nudging healthier food and beverage choices through salience and priming. Evidence from a systematic review. Food Quality and Preference 51(1): 47-64.

World Health Organization [WHO]. 2016. Fiscal Policies for Diet and Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases Technical Meeting Report, 5-6 May, Geneva, Switzerland. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250131/1/9789241511247-eng.pdf

Yang, C., Chiou, W. 2010. Substitution of healthy for unhealthy beverages among college students. A health-concerns and behavioral-economics perspective. Appetite 54(3): 512-516.