Anwar, Rosiwarna and Salehudin, Imam and Mukhlish, Basuki Muhammad and Ririh, Kirana Rukmayuninda (2015): Intention to Adopt and Willingness to Pay: Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) System in Greater Jakarta, Indonesia. Published in: ASEAN Marketing Journal , Vol. 9, No. 2 (December 2017): pp. 90-100.
PDF
MPRA_paper_94204.pdf Download (712kB) |
Abstract
The objective of this study is to explore and examine supportive factors of Mass Rapid Transport (MRT) implementation in Jakarta, Indonesia. Successful implementation requires a proper understanding of which factors are influential to the acceptance of this technology. The population of this study is commuters along the North to South route of Jakarta MRT development site. We surveyed thirteen locations along the track based on the Station Development Plan. We obtained only 392 valid data after the validation and verification process. This study used Factor Analysis (FA) to test the construct validity of the measurement instrument and Path Analysis (PA) to identify significant structural paths between variables. We found that only Attitude and Perceived Usefulness significantly predict Intention to Adopt MRT for private vehicle users, while only Attitude and Subjective Norms significantly predict Intention to Adopt MRT for public transportation users. We found that for current users of private transportation, both Overall Monthly Transport Expenditure and Intention to Adopt have a significant influence on the Willingness to Pay. While for current users of public transports, no predictor is significant for their Willingness to Pay.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Intention to Adopt and Willingness to Pay: Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) System in Greater Jakarta, Indonesia |
English Title: | Intention to Adopt and Willingness to Pay: Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) System in Greater Jakarta, Indonesia |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Intention to Adopt, Willingness to Pay, Technology Acceptance Model, Mass Rapid Transport System, Indonesia |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L91 - Transportation: General L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L92 - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M31 - Marketing R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R41 - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion ; Travel Time ; Safety and Accidents ; Transportation Noise |
Item ID: | 94204 |
Depositing User: | Imam Salehudin |
Date Deposited: | 30 May 2019 20:25 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 09:51 |
References: | Aguirre-Urreta, M. I., & Marakas, G. M. (2012). Exploring Choice as an Antecedent to Behavior: Incorporating Alternatives into the Technology Acceptance Process. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 24(1), 82-107. Arts, J. W., Frambach, R. T., & Bijmolt, T. H. (2011). Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 134-144. Bollino, C. A. (2009). The willingness to pay for renewable energy sources: the case of Italy with socio-demographic determinants. Energy Journal, 30(2), 81. Chen, C. F., & Chao, W. H. (2011). Habitual or reasoned? Using the theory of planned behavior, technology acceptance model, and habit to examine switching intentions toward public transit. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 14(2), 128-137. Cheong, J. H., & Park, M. C. (2005). Mobile internet acceptance in Korea. Internet research, 15(2), 125-140. Chern, W. S., Rickertsen, K., Tsuboi, N., & Fu, T. T. (2002). Consumer Acceptance and Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Vegetable Oil and Salmon: A Multiple-Country Assessment. AgBioForum, 5(3), 105-112. Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160-175. Drevs, F., Tscheulin, D. K., Lindenmeier, J., & Renner, S. (2014). Crowding-in or crowding out: An empirical analysis on the effect of subsidies on individual willingness-to-pay for public transportation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 59, 250-261. Erdem, C., Şentürk, İ., & Şimşek, T. (2010). Identifying the factors affecting the willingness to pay for fuel-efficient vehicles in Turkey: a case of hybrids. Energy Policy, 38(6), 3038-3043. Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2014). Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, 13-20. Hsu, J. Y., & Yen, H. L. (2012). Customers’ Adoption Factors and Willingness to Pay for Home Energy Information Management System in Taiwan. International Proceedings of Computer Science & Information Technology, 45. Hudalah, D. & Pratama, Y. (2010) MRT: Angkutan perkotaan masa depan? Bulletin Tata Ruang, 5. Diakses: http://bulletin.penataanruang.net/upload/data_artikel/ edisi5d.pdf Indonesian Ministry of Public Works, Center of Strategic Study (2009) Telaahan Isu Strategis Kebijakan Mengatasi Kemacetan di Jakarta: Menuju Penguatan Peran Departemen PU. http://www.pu.go.id/isustrategis/ view/24 Kawaguchi, H., Wachi, T., Alvinsyah, K. H., & Yagi, S. (2010). Transition in Mode Choice Due to Motorization and Improvement of Public Transportation System in Jakarta. In 12th World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon, Portugal. Li, Z., Hensher, D. A., & Rose, J. M. (2010). Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: a review and some new empirical evidence. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 46(3), 384-403. Lindau, L. A., Petzhold, G., Silva, C. A. M., & Facchini, D. (2014). BRT and bus priority corridors: Scenario in the American continent. In Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting (No. 14-4213). Manurung, Hendra (2012) SUKSESKAN JAKARTA MRT 2013, The President Post, http://thepresidentpostindonesia.com/2012/12/24/sukseskan-jakartamrt-2013/ Milton, K., Bull, F. C., & Bauman, A. (2011). Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. British journal of sports medicine, 45(3), 203-8. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1996). Integrating diffusion of innovations and theory of reasoned action models to predict utilization of information technology by end-users. In Diffusion and adoption of information technology (pp. 132-146). Springer US. MRT Jakarta (2013) Informasi Proyek: Tentang MRT. http://www.jakartamrt.com/informasi-mrt/tentangmrt/ Sardianou, E., & Genoudi, P. (2013). Which factors affect the willingness of consumers to adopt renewable energies?. Renewable Energy, 57, 1-4. Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90-103. Shropshire, J., Warkentin, M., & Sharma, S. (2015). Personality, attitudes, and intentions: Predicting initial adoption of information security behavior. Computers & Security. 49(1), 177–191. Snowden, S., Spafford, J., Michaelides, R., & Hopkins, J. (2006). Technology acceptance and m-commerce in an operational environment. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(5), 525-539. Suhendra, Z. (2013) Kerugian Akibat Macet di Jakarta Rp 12,8 Triliun/Tahun, Detik Finance, http://finance. detik.com/read/2013/05/28/130722/2257883/4/kerugian- akibat-macet-di-jakarta-rp-128-triliun-tahun Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of management journal, 32(2), 402-423. Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D. (2000), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, 46(2): 186–204 Vlassenroot, S., Brookhuis, K., Marchau, V., & Witlox, F. (2010). Towards defining a unified concept for the acceptability of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS): A conceptual analysis based on the case of Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA). Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 13(3), 164- 178. Wei, T. T., Marthandan, G., Chong, A. Y. L., Ooi, K. B., & Arumugam, S. (2009). What drives Malaysian m-commerce adoption? An empirical analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(3), 370-388. Wu, M. Y., Yu, P. Y., & Weng, Y. C. (2012). A Study on User Behavior for I Pass by UTAUT: Using Taiwan’s MRT as an Example. Asia Pacific Management Review, 17(1), 91-110. Zimmerman, J., Tomasic, A., Garrod, C., Yoo, D., Hiruncharoenvate, C., Aziz, R., Thiruvengadam, N.R., Huang, Y., & Steinfeld, A. (2011, May). Field trial of Tiramisu: crowd-sourcing bus arrival times to spur co-design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1677-1686). ACM. Zografakis, N., Sifaki, E., Pagalou, M., Nikitaki, G., Psarakis, V., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2010). Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(3), 1088-1095. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/94204 |