Dogaru, Tatiana-Camelia (2016): The Effect of Public Administration Reforms under the Post-New Public Management Paradigm. Published in: Economic and Social Development - Book of Proceedings (2016): pp. 743-753.
PDF
MPRA_paper_94399.pdf Download (249kB) |
Abstract
It is becoming increasingly apparent that the reform of public administration is a sort of Achilles heel of modern state especially, because the bureaucracies could not give up to the features of old public administration. However, the public administration, under the pressure of some international driving forces (global economic crisis, interaction with the EU system, Europeanization etc.) and development of several paradigms (new public management, post-new public management, corporate governance) has to adjust its policies, procedures, structures and relations with citizens and business and to function more effectively within the EU framework.
Today, public administration is moving in new directions. Reforms are focusing on the quality of services for citizens and business on the efficiency of administration. The focus of the paper is on selected reform area in Romanian public administration, namely de-bureaucratisation and simplification of the procedures for citizens, business and administration to achieve the European standards and to be defined by transparency, predictability, responsibility, adaptability and effectiveness. As research methodology, the study adopts a case-oriented approach to advance its arguments, using both quantitative and qualitative data, published by European and national institutions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Effect of Public Administration Reforms under the Post-New Public Management Paradigm |
English Title: | The Effect of Public Administration Reforms under the Post-New Public Management Paradigm |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | post-new public management, de-bureaucratisation, public administration, |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H12 - Crisis Management |
Item ID: | 94399 |
Depositing User: | Assist. Tatiana-Camelia Dogaru |
Date Deposited: | 10 Jun 2019 08:55 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 18:03 |
References: | Bogdanor, V. (2005). Introduction, in Bogdanor, V. (ed.). (2005). Joined-Up Government British Academy Occasional paper 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bovaird, T, Loeffler, E. (2003). Evaluating the quality of public governance: indicators, models and methodologies, International Review of Administrative Science, no. 69, pp. 313-328. Christensen, T, Lægreid, P. (eds.). (2007). Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company. Christensen, T, Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1059-1066. Christensen, T, Lægreid, P. (2009). Democracy and administrative policy: Contrasting elements of NPM and post-NPM, http://soc.kuleuven.be/io/egpa/org/2009Malta/ papers/EGPA%202009%20Tom%20christensenPer%20laegreid.pdf Dunleavy, P, Hood, C. (1994). From Old Public Administration to New Public Management. Public Money & Management, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 9-16. Dunleavy, P. et. al. (2006). New public management is dead -long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 467-494. Dunn, W, Miller, D. (2007). A Critique of the New Public Management and the Neo-Weberian State: Advancing a Critical Theory of Administrative Reform. Public Organization Review. vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 346-350. European Commission, 2016. Country Report Romania 2016. SWD(2016) 91 final, http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/csr2016/cr2016_romania_en.pdf Government Decision no. 909/2014 for approving the Strategy for Strengthening Public Administration 2014-2020, Government Emergency Ordinance no. 41/2016 on the establishment of certain measures for simplification at central public administration level and for amending and supplementing some normative acts. Gregory, R. (2006). Theoretical Faith and Practical Works: De-Autonomizing and Joining-Up in the New Zealand State Sector, in Christensen, T, Lægreid, P. (eds.), Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with agencies in the modern state. London: Edward Elgar. Hood, C, Peters, G. (2004). The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. vol. 14, No..3, pp. 267-279. Jun, J. (2009). The Limits of Post-New Public Management and Beyond. Public Administration Review. vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 161-165. Lapsley, I. (2009). New Public Management: The Cruellest Invention of the Human Spirit? ABACUS, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1-21. Ling, T. (2002). Delivering Joined-Up Government in the UK: Dimensions, Issues and Problems. Public Administration, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 615-642. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Business Environment Relationship, 2016. Working Paper, http://www.minind.ro/presa_2016/iulie/DEBIROCRATIZAREA.pdf Osborne, S. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, vol.8 no.3, pp. 377-387, Retrieved from http://spp.xmu.edu.cn/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/the-New-Public-Governance.pdf. Pollitt, C. (2003). Joint-Up Government: a Survey. Political Studies Review, no.2, pp. 34-49. Pollitt, C. (2003). The Essential Public Manager. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Robinson, M., (2015). From Old Public Administration to the New Public Service Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries, Global Centre for Public Service Excellence Romanian Government. 2016. National Programme Reform 2016, http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/csr2016/nrp2016_english_en.pdf Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative for a Network Government? American Review of Public Administration, vol.36, no. 1, pp. 41–57. Strategy for Strengthening Public Administration 2014-2020, http://www.mdrap.ro/userfiles/strategie_adm_publica.pdf Vabø, M. (2009). New Public Management: The Neoliberal Way of Governance. Working papers; No. 4, Retrieved from http://thjodmalastofnun. hi.is/sites/thjodmalastofnun.hi.is/files/skrar/working_paper_4-2009.pdf World Bank, Doing Business’ Reports. 2005-2016, http://www.doingbusiness.org/reforms. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/94399 |