Barter, Money and Direct Search Equilibrium

Ang, Joshua Ping (2014): Barter, Money and Direct Search Equilibrium.

Abstract

Given the adoption of crypto-bartering during the 2018 financial crisis in Venezuela, a direct Internet search for bartering opportunities, or communities in Greece and Russia exploring barter systems, why does the use of direct search technology not undermine the importance of traditional forms of money? In this paper, I demonstrate how a market with more types of goods leads to greater dependence on money for exchange transactions. Ultimately, agents self-impose a constraint on their search for goods only if they hold money when the number of good types is infinite or sufficiently large. This result serves to reconcile competing mainstream views by showing that the cash-in- advance constraint emerges as a subset of the money search model. Bartering exists if and only if the number of good types is sufficiently small that a double coincidence of wants is more likely to occur. The condition for the existence of a monetary equilibrium depends on a large number of different specialized goods. The reversion to a monetary economy from sporadic bartering becomes inevitable when the economy expands and agents demand more types of specialized goods.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Barter; Money; Direct Search; Decentralized Trade
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E40 - General

References

[1] Burdett, K., Coles, M., Kiyotaki, N., Wright, R., 1995. Buyers and sellers: should I stay or should I go? American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 85, 281-286.

[2] Burdett, K., Shi, S., Wright, R., 2001. Pricing and matching with frictions. Journal of Political Economy 109, 1060-1085.

[3] Burdett, K., Trejos, A., Wright, R., 2001. Cigarette money. Journal of Economic Theory 99, 117-142.

[4] Corbae, D., Temzelides, T., Wright, R., 2003. Directed matching and monetary exchange. Econometrica 71, 731-756.

[5] Goldberg, D., 2007. Money with partially directed search. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 979-993.

[6] Howitt, P., 2005. Beyond search: fiat money in organized exchange. International Eco- nomic Review 46, 405-429.

[7] Kim, J., Camera, G., 2014. Uniqueness of equilibrium in directed search models. Journal of Economic Theory 151, 248-267.

[8] Kiyotaki, N., Wright, R., 1989. On money as a medium of exchange. Journal of Political Economy 97, 927-954.

[9] Kiyotaki, N., Wright, R., 1993. A search-theoretic approach to monetary economics. American Economic Review 83, 63-77.

[10] Menzio, G., Telyukova, I., Visschers, L., 2012. Directed search over the life cycle. NBER Working paper No. 17746.

[11] Menzio, G., Shi, S., 2010. Directed search on the job, heterogeneity, and aggregate fluctuations. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 100, 327-332. 22

[12] Williamson, S., Wright, R., 2012. New monetarist economics: models. Handbook of Monetary Economics, 25-96.