Bringing together “old” and “new” ways of solving social dilemmas? The case of Spanish Gitanos

Espín, Antonio M. and Brañas-Garza, Pablo and Gamella, Juan and Herrmann, Benedikt and Martin, Jesus (2019): Bringing together “old” and “new” ways of solving social dilemmas? The case of Spanish Gitanos.

Abstract

Humans often punish non-cooperators in one-shot interactions among genetically-unrelated individuals. So-called altruistic punishment poses an evolutionary puzzle because it enforces a cooperation norm that benefits the whole group, but is costly for the punisher. Under the “big mistake” (or “mismatch”) hypothesis, social behavior such as punishment evolved by individual selection at a time when repeated interactions with kin prevailed. It then misfired in modern humans, who “mistakenly” apply it in sporadic interactions with unrelated individuals. In contrast, cultural group selection theories emphasize cultural differences in normative behavior and the role of intergroup competition and punishment for the emergence of large-scale cooperation in the absence of genetic relatedness. We conducted a series of multilateral-cooperation economic experiments with a sample of Spanish Romani people (Gitanos), who represent a unique cultural group to test the predictions of the two accounts: Gitano communities rely heavily on close kin-based networks, maintain high consanguinity rates and display a particularly strong sense of ethnic identity. A total of 320 Gitano and non-Gitano (i.e., the majority Spanish population) participants played a one-shot public goods game with punishment in either ethnically homogeneous or ethnically mixed (half Gitano and half non-Gitano) four-person groups. In the homogeneous groups, punishment was commonly used by non-Gitanos but virtually inexistent among Gitanos. In the mixed groups, however, Gitanos who did not cooperate were severely punished by other Gitanos, but also by non-Gitanos (particularly males in both cases). The results are more consistent with cultural group selection and also qualify some of its predictions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: cooperation, punishment, Gypsy/Roma, ethnicity, culture, evolution
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination > J71 - Discrimination; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

1. Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 1560-1563.

2. Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390-1396.

3. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57.

4. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52.

5. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 132(3), 337-356.

6. Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 153-172.

7. Sigmund, K. (2007). Punish or perish? Retaliation and collaboration among humans. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22(11), 593-600.

8. Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (2001). Why people punish defectors: Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208(1), 79-89.

9. Henrich, J. (2004). Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53(1), 3-35.

10. Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(6), 3531-3535.

11. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137-140.

12. Gächter, S., Renner, E., & Sefton, M. (2008). The long-run benefits of punishment. Science, 322(5907), 1510-1510.

13. Sääksvuori, L., Mappes, T., & Puurtinen, M. (2011). Costly punishment prevails in intergroup conflict. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, rspb20110252.

14. Herrmann, B., Thöni, C., & Gächter, S. (2008). Antisocial punishment across societies. Science, 319(5868), 1362-1367.

15. Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D., & Nowak, M. A. (2008). Winners don’t punish. Nature, 452(7185), 348-351.

16. Oliver, P. (1980). Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: theoretical investigations. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1356-1375.

17. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 51(1), 110.

18. Gächter, S., & Herrmann, B. (2009). Reciprocity, culture and human cooperation: previous insights and a new cross-cultural experiment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1518), 791-806.

19. Espín, A. M., Brañas-Garza, P., Herrmann, B., & Gamella, J. F. (2012). Patient and impatient punishers of free-riders. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, rspb20122043.

20. Henrich, J., Mcelreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, E., ... & Gwako, E. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312, 1767–1770.

21. Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness: preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19(4), 339-347.

22. Tabibnia, G., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Fairness and cooperation are rewarding. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 90-101.

23. Crockett, M. J., Apergis-Schoute, A., Herrmann, B., Lieberman, M. D., Müller, U., Robbins, T. W., & Clark, L. (2013). Serotonin modulates striatal responses to fairness and retaliation in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(8), 3505-3513.

24. de Quervain, D. J., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., & Schellhammer, M. (2004). The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305(5688), 1254.

25. Hu, Y., Strang, S., & Weber, B. (2015). Helping or punishing strangers: neural correlates of altruistic decisions as third-party and of its relation to empathic concern. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 24.

26. Lehmann, L., Rousset, F., Roze, D., & Keller, L. (2007). Strong reciprocity or strong ferocity? A population genetic view of the evolution of altruistic punishment. The American Naturalist, 170(1), 21-36.

27. Burnham, T. C., & Johnson, D. D. (2005). The biological and evolutionary logic of human cooperation. Analyse and Kritik, 27(1), 113.

28. Hagen, E. H., & Hammerstein, P. (2006). Game theory and human evolution: A critique of some recent interpretations of experimental games. Theoretical Population Biology, 69(3), 339-348.

29. Delton, A. W., Krasnow, M. M., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2011). Evolution of direct reciprocity under uncertainty can explain human generosity in one-shot encounters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(32), 13335-13340.

30. Krasnow, M. M., Cosmides, L., Pedersen, E. J., & Tooby, J. (2012). What are punishment and reputation for?. PloS one, 7(9), e45662.

31. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11(4), 375-424.

32. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. The Adapted Mind, 163-228.

33. Johnson, D. D., Stopka, P., & Knights, S. (2003). Sociology (communication arising): The puzzle of human cooperation. Nature, 421(6926), 911-912.

34. Lamba, S., & Mace, R. (2011). Demography and ecology drive variation in cooperation across human populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(35), 14426-14430.

35. Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1-25.

36. Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (2007). Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 43-64.

37. Soltis, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1995). Can group-functional behaviors evolve by cultural group selection?: An empirical test. Current Anthropology, 36(3), 473-494.

38. Bowles, S. (2006). Group competition, reproductive leveling, and the evolution of human altruism. Science, 314(5805), 1569-1572.

39. Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., ... & Ross, C. (2016). Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39.

40. Mesoudi, A. (2016). Cultural evolution: integrating psychology, evolution and culture. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 17-22.

41. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2008). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.

42. Henrich, J. (2015). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press.

43. Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(5), 218-226.

44. Brañas-Garza, P., Cobo-Reyes, R., & Domínguez, A. (2006). Si él lo necesita: Gypsy fairness in Vallecas. Experimental Economics, 9(3), 253-264.

45. Martín, J., Brañas-Garza, P., Espín, A. M., Gamella, J. F., & Herrmann, B. (2019). The appropriate response of Spanish Gitanos: Short-run orientation beyond current socio-economic status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(1), 12-22.

46. Bauer, M., Cahlíková, J., Chytilová, J., & Želinský, T. (2018). Social contagion of ethnic hostility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4881-4886.

47. Hong, Y. Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709.

48. Benet-Martínez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. W. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 492-516.

49. Gamella, J. F., Martín, E. (2007). Vien avec moi cousine. Le mariage entre cousins germains chez le Gitans Andalous. Etudes Tsiganes, 30, 110-151.

50. Martin, E., & Gamella, J. F. (2005). Marriage practices and ethnic differentiation: The case of Spanish Gypsies (1870–2000). The History of the Family, 10(1), 45-63.

51. Gay Blasco, P. (1999). Gypsies in Madrid: Sex, gender and the performance of identity. Bloomsbury Academic.

52. Cantón, M. (2010) “Gypsy Pentecostalism, ethnopolitical uses and construction of belonging in the south of Spain”. Social Compass (International Review of Sociology of Religion), Vol. 57, nº 2, pp. 253-267.

53. Schulz, J., Bahrami-Rad, D., Beauchamp, J., & Henrich, J. (2018). The origins of WEIRD psychology. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3201031

54. Weyrauch, W. O. (Ed.) (2001). Gypsy law: Romani legal traditions and culture. University of California Press.

55. Marushiakova, E., & Popov, V. (2007). The Gypsy court in eastern Europe. Romani Studies, 17(1), 67-101.

56. Sorescu-Marinković, A. (2013). "The court of the Bayash: Revising a theory." Romani Studies23(1), 1-28.

57. San Román, T. (2010). La diferencia inquietante: viejas y nuevas estrategias culturales de los gitanos. Siglo XXI de España Editores.

58. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information/sur les Sciences Socials, 13(2), 65-93.

59. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

60. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429-444.

61. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2008). Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 296-330.

62. Pinel, E. C. (1999). Stigma consciousness: the psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 114.

63. Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35), 15073- 15078.

64. Brañas-Garza, P., Espín, A. M., Exadaktylos, F., & Herrmann, B. (2014). Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game. Scientific Reports, 4, 6025.

65. Mathew, S., & Boyd, R. (2011). Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(28), 11375-11380.

66. Van Vugt, M., De Cremer, D., & Janssen, D. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition the Male-Warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18(1), 19-23.

67. McDonald, M. M., Navarrete, C. D., & Van Vugt, M. (2012). Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 670-679.

68. Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press.

69. Henrich, J., & Henrich, N. (2014). Fairness without punishment: behavioral experiments in the Yasawa Island, Fiji. In Experimenting with Social Norms: Fairness and Punishment in Cross-Cultural Perspective, 171-218.

70. Gardner, A., & West, S. A. (2004). Cooperation and punishment, especially in humans. The American Naturalist, 164(6), 753-764.

71. Walker, R. S. (2014). Amazonian horticulturalists live in larger, more related groups than hunter–gatherers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(5), 384-388.

72. Rusch, H. (2018). Ancestral kinship patterns substantially reduce the negative effect of increasing group size on incentives for public goods provision. Journal of Economic Psychology, 64, 105-115.

73. Krupp, D. B., Debruine, L. M., & Barclay P. (2008). A cue of kinship promotes cooperation for the public good. Evolution & Human Behavior, 29, 49–55.

74. Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715-753.

75. Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2011). Identity, morals, and boos: Beliefs as assets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 805-855.

76. Crisp, R. J., Walsh, J., & Hewstone, M. (2006). Crossed categorization in common ingroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1204-1218.

77. McLeish, K. N., & Oxoby, R. J. (2007). Identity, cooperation, and punishment. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2572.

78. McLeish, K. N., & Oxoby, R. J. (2011). Social interactions and the salience of social identity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 172-178.

79. Mendoza, S. A., Lane, S. P. & Amodio, D. M. (2014). For members only: ingroup punishment of fairness norm violations in the ultimatum game. Social Psychological and Personality Science5(6), 662–670.

80. Shinada, M., Yamagishi, T., & Ohmura, Y. (2004). False friends are worse than bitter enemies: “Altruistic” punishment of in-group members. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(6), 379-393.

81. Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2006). Parochial altruism in humans. Nature, 442(7105), 912-915.

82. Baumgartner, T., Schiller, B., Rieskamp, J., Gianotti, L. R., & Knoch, D. (2013). Diminishing parochialism in intergroup conflict by disrupting the right temporo-parietal junction. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, nst023.

83. Goette, L., Huffman, D., & Meier, S. (2006). The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups. American Economic Review, 96(2), 212-216.

84. Jordan, J. J., McAuliffe, K., & Warneken, F. (2014). Development of in-group favoritism in children’s third-party punishment of selfishness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(35), 12710-12715.

85. Schiller, B., Baumgartner, T., & Knoch, D. (2014). Intergroup bias in third-party punishment stems from both ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 169-175.

86. Rabellino, D., Morese, R., Ciaramidaro, A., Bara, B. G., & Bosco, F. M. (2016). Third-party punishment: altruistic and anti-social behaviours in in-group and out-group settings. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1-10.

87. Delton, A. W., & Krasnow, M. M. (2017). The psychology of deterrence explains why group membership matters for third-party punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(6), 734-743.

88. Yudkin, D. A., Van Bavel, J. J., & Rhodes, M. (2019). Young children police group members at personal cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.

89. Espín, A. M., Exadaktylos, F., Herrmann, B., & Brañas-Garza, P. (2015). Short-and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 214.

90. Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16(12), 951-957.

91. Shelton, J. N. (2003). Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority group members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(2), 171-185.

92. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse?. Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620-630.

93. Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 50-58.

94. Brañas-Garza, P., Galizzi, M., & Nieboer, J. (2018). Experimental and self-reported measures of risk taking and digit ratio (2D: 4D): evidence from a large, systematic study. International Economic Review, 59(3), 1131-1157.

95. Brañas-Garza, P., & Rustichini, A. (2011). Organizing effects of testosterone and economic behavior: Not just risk taking. PloS One, 6(12), e29842.