Chu, Angus C. and Kou, Zonglai and Wang, Xilin (2019): Effects of Patents on the Transition from Stagnation to Growth. Forthcoming in: Journal of Population Economics
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF
MPRA_paper_95525.pdf Download (233kB) |
Abstract
This study provides a growth-theoretic analysis of the effects of intellectual property rights on the take-off of an economy from an era of stagnation to a state of sustained economic growth. We incorporate patent protection into a Schumpeterian growth model in which take-off occurs when the population size crosses an endogenous threshold. We find that strengthening patent protection has contrasting effects on economic growth at different stages of development. Specifically, it leads to an earlier take-off but also reduces economic growth in the long run.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Effects of Patents on the Transition from Stagnation to Growth |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | intellectual property rights, endogenous takeoff, innovation, economic growt |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital |
Item ID: | 95525 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Angus C. Chu |
Date Deposited: | 19 Aug 2019 14:41 |
Last Modified: | 10 Oct 2019 19:41 |
References: | Acemoglu, D., and Akcigit, U., 2012. Intellectual property rights policy, competition and innovation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2012, 10, 1-42. Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-351. Ashraf, Q., and Galor, O., 2011. Dynamics and stagnation in the Malthusian epoch. American Economic Review, 101, 2003-41. Bessen, J., and Meurer, M., 2008. Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk. Princeton University Press. Boldrin, M., and Levine, D., 2008. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press. Chu, A., 2009. Effects of blocking patents on R&D: A quantitative DGE analysis. Journal of Economic Growth, 14, 55-78. Chu, A., Cozzi, G., Fan, H., Pan, S., and Zhang, M., 2019. Do stronger patents stimulate or stifle innovation? The crucial role of financial development. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, forthcoming. Chu, A., Cozzi, G., and Galli, S., 2012. Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation? European Economic Review, 56, 727-746. Chu, A., Cozzi, G., and Galli, S., 2014. Stage-dependent intellectual property rights. Journal of Development Economics, 106, 239-249. Chu, A., Furukawa, Y., and Ji, L., 2016. Patents, R&D subsidies and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian Economy. Southern Economic Journal, 82, 809-825. Cozzi, G., 2001. Inventing or spying? Implications for growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 6, 55-77. Cozzi, G., and Galli, S., 2014. Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 19, 183-219. Desmet, K., and Parente, S., 2012. The evolution of markets and the revolution of industry: A unified theory of growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 17, 205-234. Dutton, H., 1984. The Patent System and Inventive Activity During the Industrial Revolution, 1750-1852. Manchester University Press. Furukawa, Y., 2007. The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, 3644-3670. Gallini, N., 1992. Patent policy and costly imitation. RAND Journal of Economics, 23, 52-63. Galor, O., 2011. Unified Growth Theory. Princeton University Press. Galor, O., and Moav, O., 2002. Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1133-1192. Galor, O., and Mountford, A., 2008. Trading population for productivity: Theory and evidence. Review of Economic Studies, 75, 1143-1179. Galor, O., and Weil, D., 2000. Population, technology and growth: From the Malthusian regime to the demographic transition. American Economic Review, 110, 806-828. Gilbert, R., and Shapiro, C., 1990. Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 106-112. Goh, A.-T., and Olivier, J., 2002. Optimal patent protection in a two-sector economy. International Economic Review, 43, 1191-1214. Hansen, G., and Prescott, E., 2002. Malthus to Solow. American Economic Review, 2002, 92, 1205-1217. Huang, C., Yang, Y., and Cheng, C., 2017. The growth and welfare analysis of patent and monetary policies in a Schumpeterian economy. International Review of Economics & Finance, 52, 409-426. Iwaisako, T., 2013. Welfare effects of patent protection and productive public services: Why do developing countries prefer weaker patent protection?. Economics Letters, 118, 478-481. Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2013. Patent protection, capital accumulation, and economic growth. Economic Theory, 52, 631-668. Jaffe, A., and Lerner, J., 2004. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton University Press. Jones, C., 2001. Was an industrial revolution inevitable? Economic growth over the very long run. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics (Advances), 1, 1-45. Khan, Z., 2005. The Democratization of Invention: Patents and Copyrights in American Economic Development, 1790-1920. Cambridge University Press. Li, C.-W., 2001. On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. Economic Journal, 111, C164-C179. Mokyr, J., 2009. Intellectual property rights, the industrial revolution, and the beginnings of modern economic growth. American Economic Review, 99, 349-355. North, D., 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York and London: W. W. Norton. North, D., and Thomas, R., 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge University Press. O'Donoghue, T., and Zweimuller, J., 2004. Patents in a model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 81-123. Peretto, P., 1998. Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 283-311. Peretto, P., 1999. Cost reduction, entry, and the interdependence of market structure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43, 173-195. Peretto, P., 2015. From Smith to Schumpeter: A theory of take-off and convergence to sustained growth. European Economic Review, 78, 1-26. Peretto, P., and Connolly, M., 2007. The Manhattan metaphor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12, 329-50. Pomeranz, K., 2001. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton University Press. Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102. Smulders, S. and van de Klundert T., 1995. Imperfect competition, concentration and growth with firm-specific R&D. European Economic Review, 39, 139-160. Weisdorf, J., 2004. From stagnation to growth: Revisiting three historical regimes. Journal of Population Economics, 17, 455-472. Yang, Y., 2018. On the optimality of IPR protection with blocking patents. Review of Economic Dynamics, 27, 205-230. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/95525 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Effects of Patents on the Industrial Revolution. (deposited 31 Jan 2019 15:07)
-
Effects of Patents on the Transition from Stagnation to Growth. (deposited 10 Jun 2019 08:57)
- Effects of Patents on the Transition from Stagnation to Growth. (deposited 19 Aug 2019 14:41) [Currently Displayed]
-
Effects of Patents on the Transition from Stagnation to Growth. (deposited 10 Jun 2019 08:57)