A simulation of the insurance industry: The problem of risk model homogeneity

Heinrich, Torsten and Sabuco, Juan and Farmer, J. Doyne (2019): A simulation of the insurance industry: The problem of risk model homogeneity.

Abstract

We develop an agent-based simulation of the catastrophe insurance and reinsurance industry and use it to study the problem of risk model homogeneity. The model simulates the balance sheets of insurance firms, who collect premiums from clients in return for ensuring them against intermittent, heavy-tailed risks. Firms manage their capital and pay dividends to their investors, and use either reinsurance contracts or cat bonds to hedge their tail risk. The model generates plausible time series of profits and losses and recovers stylized facts, such as the insurance cycle and the emergence of asymmetric, long tailed firm size distributions. We use the model to investigate the problem of risk model homogeneity. Under Solvency II, insurance companies are required to use only certified risk models. This has led to a situation in which only a few firms provide risk models, creating a systemic fragility to the errors in these models. We demonstrate that using too few models increases the risk of nonpayment and default while lowering profits for the industry as a whole. The presence of the reinsurance industry ameliorates the problem but does not remove it. Our results suggest that it would be valuable for regulators to incentivize model diversity. The framework we develop here provides a first step toward a simulation model of the insurance industry for testing policies and strategies for better capital management.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: insurance; systemic risk; reinsurance; agent-based simulation; risk modeling
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G22 - Insurance ; Insurance Companies ; Actuarial Studies; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G28 - Government Policy and Regulation

References

Anderson, S. (2000). The Anglo-Dutch ’Smyrna fleet’ of 1693. In Hamilton, A., Hendrik de Groot, A., and Van Den Boogert, M., editors, Friends and Rivals in the East: Studies in Anglo-Dutch Relations in the Levant from the Seventeenth to the Early Nineteenth Century, Publications of the Sir Thomas Browne Institute Leiden, page 95–116. The Netherlands: Brill, Leiden.

Barde, S. and van der Hoog, S. (2017). An empirical validation protocol for large-scale agent-based models. University of Kent School of Economics Discussion Papers: KPDE 1712.

Bates, J. M. and Granger, C. W. J. (1969). The combination of forecasts. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 20(4):451–468.

BMA (Bermuda Monetary Authority) (2016). Catastrophe risk in Bermuda: Bscr stress testing and modeling practice analysis (2015 report). Available online: https://www.bma.bm/viewPDF/documents/2018-12-28-07-39-44-BMA-Catastrophe-Risk-in-Bermuda-Report-2015.pdf.

BMA (Bermuda Monetary Authority) (2018). Catastrophe risk in Bermuda: Bscr stress testing and modeling practice analysis (2017 report). Available online: http://cloudfront.bernews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Catastrophe-Risk-in-Bermuda-2017-Report.pdf.

Boyer, M. M. and Dupont-Courtade, T. (2015). The structure of reinsurance contracts. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 40(3):474–492. Caccioli, F., Farmer, J. D., Foti, N., and Rockmore, D. (2015). Overlapping portfolios, contagion, and financial stability. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 51:50 – 63.

Campbell, B., Klein, A., Overton, M., and van Leeuwen, B. (2015). British Economic Growth, 1270–1870. Cambridge University Press.

Christensen, K., Danon, L., Scanlon, T., and Bak, P. (2002). Unified scaling law for earthquakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(1):2509–2513.

Cummins, J. (2008). Cat bonds and other risk-linked securities: State of the market and recent developments. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 11(1):23–47.

Cummins, J. D. and Weiss, M. A. (2014). Systemic risk and the U.S. insurance sector. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 81(3):489–528.

Deutsch, M., Granger, C. W., and Teräsvirta, T. (1994). The combination of forecasts using changing weights. International Journal of Forecasting, 10(1):47 – 57.

Du, N., Zeng, Z., and Viswanathan, K. (2015). The square-root rule for reinsurance: Further analysis and consideration of China’s market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, 9(1):125–148.

Dubbelboer, J., Nikolic, I., Jenkins, K., and Hall, J. (2017). An agent-based model of flood risk and insurance. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20(1):1–23.

Eling, M. and Pankoke, D. A. (2014). Basis risk, procyclicality, and systemic risk in the Solvency II equity risk module. Journal of Insurance Regulation, 33:1–39.

Emanuel, K. and Jagger, T. (2010). On estimating hurricane return periods. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 49:837–844.

Embrechts, P., Resnick, S. I., and Samorodnitsky, G. (1999). Extreme value theory as a risk management tool. North American Actuarial Journal, 3(2):30–41.

Fagiolo, G., Guerini, M., Lamperti, F., Moneta, A., Roventini, A., et al. (2017). Validation of agent-based models in economics and finance. LEM Papers Series, 23.

Froot, K. A. (2001). The market for catastrophe risk: a clinical examination. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2):529 – 571. Complementary Research Methodologies: The InterPlay of Theoretical, Empirical and Field-Based Research in Finance.

Garven, J. R. and Lamm-Tennant, J. (2003). The demand for reinsurance: Theory and empirical tests. Assurances et Gestion des Risques (Insurance and Risk Management), 71(3):217–237. http://www.revueassurances.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/2003 71 no2 Garven.pdf.

Gatzert, N. and Wesker, H. (2012). A comparative assessment of Basel II/III and solvency II. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 37(3):539–570.

Go, S. (2009). Marine Insurance in the Netherlands 1600-1870: A Comparative Institutional Approach. Amsterdam University Press.

Grinsted, A., Ditlevsen, P., and Christensen, J. H. (2019). Normalized us hurricane damage estimates using area of total destruction, 1900-2018. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Hong, L. and Page, S. E. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(46):16385–16389.

House of Commons (1693). Journal of the House of Commons: Volume 11, 1693-1697 (london, 1803), pp. 30-31. Available online: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/commons-jrnl/vol11/pp30-31.

Kessler, D. (2014). Why (re)insurance is not systemic. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 81(3):477–488.

Lamm-Tennant, J. and Weiss, M. A. (1997). International insurance cycles: rational expectations/institutional intervention. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 64(3):415–439.

Lamperti, F., Roventini, A., and Sani, A. (2017). Agent-based model calibration using machine learning surrogates. Online on arXiv.org: http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.10639.

Lane, M. and Mahul, O. (2008). Catastrophe risk pricing: An empirical analysis. Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4765, World Bank, Washington, DC, Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6900.

Leonard, A. B. (2013a). Contingent commitment: The development of english marine insurance in the context of new institutional economics, 1577–1720. In Coffman, D., Leonard, A., and Neal, L., editors, Questioning Credible Commitment: Perspectives on the Rise of Financial Capitalism, Macroeconomic Policy Making, page 48–75. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Leonard, A. B. (2013b). Underwriting marine warfare: Insurance and conflict in the eighteenth century. International Journal of Maritime History, 25(2):173–185.

Maynard, T. (2016). Extreme insurance and the dynamics of risk. PhD thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). Available online: http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3297/1/Maynard Extreme Insurance.pdf.

Newbold, P. and Granger, C. W. J. (1974). Experience with forecasting univariate time series and the combination of forecasts. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 137(2):131–165.

Owadally, I., Zhou, F., and Wright, D. (2018). The insurance industry as a complex social system: Competition, cycles and crises. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 21(4):2.

Park, S. C. and Xie, X. (2014). Reinsurance and systemic risk: The impact of reinsurer downgrading on property-casualty insurers. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 81(3):587–622.

Petratos, P., Sandberg, A., and Zhou, F. (2017). Cyberinsurance. In Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J., and Efthymiopoulos, M. P., editors, Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense, pages 1–28. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

Plantin, G. (2006). Does reinsurance need reinsurers? 73(1):153–168. Journal of Risk and Insurance,

Platt, D. (2019). A comparison of economic agent-based model calibration methods. Online on arXiv.org: https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.05938.

Powers, M. R. and Ren, J. (2003). The demand for reinsurance: Theory and empirical tests. Assurances et Gestion des Risques (Insurance and Risk Management), 71(3):239–264. http://www.revueassurances.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/2003 71 no2 Powers.pdf.

Powers, M. R. and Shubik, M. (2006). A ”square-root rule” for reinsurance. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 17(SPE2):101–107.

Ronkainen, V., Koskinen, L., and Berglund, R. (2007). Topical modelling issues in Solvency II. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2007(2):135–146.

Tsanakas, A. and Cabantous, L. (2018). Chapter 15 - beyond “model risk”: A practice perspective on modeling in insurance. In Michel, G., editor, Risk Modeling for Hazards and Disasters, pages 299 – 305. Elsevier.

Venezian, E. C., Viswanathan, K. S., and Jucá, I. B. (2005). A “square-root rule” for reinsurance? evidence from several national markets. The Journal of Risk Finance, 6(4):319–334.

Zhou, F. (2013). Application of Agent Based Modeling to Insurance Cycles. PhD thesis, City University London. Available online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/12195/1/Application%20of%20Agent%20Based%20Modeling %20to%20Insurance%20Cycles.pdf.