Optimal Value-at-Risk Disclosure

Seixas, Mário and Barbosa, António (2019): Optimal Value-at-Risk Disclosure.

Abstract

Abstract In 1995, the Basel Accords introduced an alternative method to compute the market risk charge through the use of a risk model developed internally by the financial institution. These internal models, based on the Value-at-Risk (VaR), follow certain rules that are defined under the Basel Accords. From this moment on, risk analysts and financial academics focused their attentions on how to accurately estimate the VaR in order to reduce the regulatory capital. However, considering the market risk framework defined in the Basel Accords, the best strategy to optimize the regulatory capital may not lie in truthfully disclosing an accurate VaR estimation. In this study, we propose to solve, through dynamic programming, for the optimal policy function for disclosing the reported VaR based on the estimated value that minimizes the daily capital charge. This policy function will provide the optimal percentage of the estimated 1-day VaR that should be disclosed, taking into account the impact that this disclosure decision will have in future capital charges, by managing the rules defined in the Basel Accords. Our goal is to prove that truthful disclosure of an accurately estimated VaR is suboptimal. The main results from our investigation show that using the optimal reporting strategy leads to an average daily reduction in the capital requirements of 4.32% in a simulated environment, compared with a normal strategy of always truthfully disclosing the estimated 1-day VaR, and leads to an average daily saving of 7.22% when applied to our S&P500 test portfolio.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Value-at-Risk, Regulatory Capital, Market Risk Charge, Optimal Disclosure, Dynamic Programming
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice ; Investment Decisions; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G17 - Financial Forecasting and Simulation; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G28 - Government Policy and Regulation; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill

References

Ahn, D.-H., Boudoukh, J., Richardson, M., and Whitelaw, R. F. (1999). Optimal risk management using options. The Journal of Finance, 54:359–375.

Alexander, C. (2008). Market Risk Analysis IV: Value-at-Risk Models. John Wiley & Sons.

Angelovska, J. (2013). Managing market risk with var (value at risk). Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 18(2):81–96.

Aussenegg, W. and Miazhynskaia, T. (2006). Uncertainty in value-at-risk estimates under parametric and non-parametric modeling. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 20(3):243–264.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervison (1995). An internal model-based approach to market risk capital requirements. Bank for International Settlements.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervison (2009). Revisions to the Basel II market risk framework. Bank for International Settlements.

Beder, T. (1995). Var: Seductive but dangerous. Financial Analysts Journal, 51(5):12–24.

Bellman, R. (1954). The theory of dynamic programming. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

Deelstra, G., Ezzine, A., Heyman, D., and Vanmaele, M. (2007). Managing value-at-risk for a bond using bond put options. Computational Economics, 29(2):133–149.

Deng, G., Dulaney, T., McCann, C. J., and Wang, O. Y.-H. (2013). Robust portfolio optimization with value-at-risk-adjusted sharpe ratios. Journal of Asset Management, 14:293–305.

Hull, J. and White, A. (1998). Value at risk when daily changes in market variables are not normally distributed. Journal of Derivatives, 5:9–19.

JPMorgan (1996). Riskmetrics technical document. New York: JPMorgan.

Künzi-Bay, A. and Mayer, J. (2006). Computational aspects of minimizing conditional value-at-risk. Computational Management Science, 3(1):3–27.

Lim, C., Sherali, H. D., and Uryasev, S. (2010). Portfolio optimization by minimizing conditional value-at-risk via nondifferentiable optimization. Computational Optimization and Applications, 46(3):391–415.

Mansini, R., Ogryczak, W., and Speranza, M. G. (2007). Conditional value at risk and related linear programming models for portfolio optimization. Annals of Operations Research, 152(1):227–256.

McAleer, M. (2009). The ten commandments for optimizing value-at-risk and daily capital charges. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(5):831–849.

McAleer, M., Jimenez-Martin, J.-A., and Pérez-Amaral, T. (2010). A decision rule to minimize daily capital charges in forecasting value-at-risk. Journal of Forecasting, 29(7):617–634.

Miranda, M. J. and Fackler, P. L. (2002). Applied Computational Economics and Finance. The MIT Press.

Ogryczak, W. and Sliwiński, T. (2011). On solving the dual for portfolio selection by optimizing conditional value at risk. Computational Optimization and Applications, 50(3):591–595.

Pérignon, C. and Smith, D. R. (2010). The level and quality of value-at-risk disclosure by commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34:362–377.

Totić, S., Bulajić, M., and Vlastelica, T. (2011). Empirical comparison of conventional methods and extreme value theory approach in value-at-risk assessment. African Journal of Business Management, 5(33):12810–12818.

Ünal, G. (2011). Value-at-risk forecasts: A comparison analysis of extreme-value versus classical approaches. Journal of Risk Model Validation, 5(3):59–76.