Support for Market Economy Principles in European Post-Communist Countries during 1999–2008

Sirovátka, Tomáš and Guzi, Martin and Saxonberg, Steve (2019): Support for Market Economy Principles in European Post-Communist Countries during 1999–2008. Published in: Czech Sociological Review , Vol. 3, No. 55 (2019): pp. 319-345.

Abstract

Since the fall of the communist regimes in Central and Eastern Europe in 1989, a neoliberal discourse has dominated the thinking of the political elite in the post-communist countries, paving the way for unprecedented mass privatisation, economic deregulation, and other market reforms. In this article, we study the development of public support for market economy principles in post-communist countries compared to other European countries during the 1999-2008 period, which is the period that directly followed the initial stage of market transformation. We use data from the European Value Survey covering 22 European countries for the years 1999/2000 and 2008/2009. In addition to analysing the trends, we apply multilevel regression models to study the determinants and levels of support for the market economy in post-communist and other European countries. We find that, when controlling for individual and country-level variables, a significant increase in support for market economy principles has taken place in the post-communist cluster, which is not the case in the other countries. There is some inconsistency in support for the individual principles of market economics: support exists in post-communist countries for the notion that the state should be responsible for the social and economic well-being of its inhabitants and for state regulation of the economy, while support is high for some market economy principles, such as free competition and private ownership. In other words, support for some kind of social market seems to prevail among those living in post-communist countries, based on the notion that the state should combine a market economy with relatively generous social policies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: market economy, post-communist countries, free competition, private ownership, state regulation of economy, welfare attitudes
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B20 - General; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact

References

Andreß, H.J. and T. Heien (2001). ‘Four Worlds of Welfare State Attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States.’ European Sociological Review 17 (4): 337-356.

Appel, H. and M.A. Orenstein (2016). ‘Why did Neoliberalism Triumph and Endure in the Post-Communist World?’ Comparative Politics 48(3): 313-331.

Ban, C. (2016). ‘Ruling Ideas. How Global Neoliberalism Goes Local.’ New York: Oxford University Press.

Barr, N. (ed.) (1994). Labour Markets and Social Policy in Central and Eastern Europe. The Transition and Beyond. Oxford, New York, Toronto: Oxford University Press.

Battaglio, R.P., Jr. (2009). ‘Privatization and Citizen Preferences A Cross-National Analysis of Demand for Private Versus Public Provision of Services in Three Industries.’ Administration & Society 41 (1): 38-66.

Battaglio, R.P., Jr. and J.S. Legge Jr. (2009). ‘Self-Interest, Ideological/Symbolic Politics, and Citizen Characteristics: A Cross-National Analysis of Support for Privatization.’ Public Administration Review. 69 (4): 697-709.

Berend, I.T. and B. Bugaric (2015). ‘Unfinished Europe: Transition from Communism to Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe.’ Journal of Contemporary History 50 (4): 768–785.

Blekesaune, M. (2007). ‘Economic Conditions and Public Attitudes to Welfare Policies.’Morten Blekesaune European Sociological Review 23 (3): 393–403.

Bohle, D. and B. Greskovits (2007). ‘Neoliberalism, Embedded Neoliberalism, and Neocorporatism: Paths Towards Transnational Capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe.’ West-European Politics. 30 (3): 443-466.

Cerami, A. (2006). Social Policy in Central and Eastern Europe: The Emergence of a New European Welfare Regime. Munster: LIT.

Checchi, D., Florio, M. and J. Carrera (2006). ‘Privatization Discontent and Its Determinants: Evidence from Latin America.’ Discussion Paper No. 1587. Bonn: IZA.

Dallinger, U. (2010). ‘Public Support for Redistribution: What Explains Cross-National Differences?’ Journal of European Social Policy 20 (4): 333–349.

Davis, Ch. L. and K.M. Coleman (2001). ‘Privatization and Public Opinion in Chile, Costa Rica, and Mexico: A Test of Alternative Models.’ International Politics 38 (4): 561–582.

Denisova, I., M. Eller, T. Frye, and E. Zhuravskaya (2009). ‘Who wants to revise privatization? The complementarity of market skills and institutions.’ American Political Science Review 103 (2): 284–304.

Denisova, I., M. Eller, T. Frye, and E. Zhuravskaya (2012). ‘Everyone hates privatization, but why? Survey evidence from 28 post-communist countries.’ Journal of Comparative Economics 40 (1):44−61.

Desai, R. and A. Olofsgård (2006). ‘Political Constraints and Public Support for Market Reform.’ IMF Staff Papers, 53 (5):92-114.

Durant, R.F. and J.S. Legge. (2002). ‘Politics, Public Opinion, and Privatization in France: Assessing the Calculus of Consent for Market Reforms.’ Public Administration Review 62 (3): 307-323.

Easter, G.M. (2002). ‘Politics of Revenue Extraction in Post-Communist States: Poland and Russia Compared.’ Politics & Society 30(4):599-627.

Estrin, S. (1994). ‘Economic transition and privatization: the issues.’ Pp. 3-30 in Estrin, S. (ed.) Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe. Harlow, Essex: Longman.

Estrin, S. (2008). ‘Privatization Impacts in Transition Economies’. Pp. 5161-5169 in Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Houndmills,Basingstoke: Palgrave.

ERBD/European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2018). Transition indicators methodology. Accessed on October 10, 2018, https://www.ebrd.com/cs/Satellite?c=Content&cid=1395237866249&pagename=EBRD%2FContent%2FContentLayout

EVS (2015). European Values Study Longitudinal Data File 1981-2008 (EVS 1981-2008). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4804 Data file Version 3.0.0, http://dx. doi:10.4232/1.12253

Eurostat (2017a). Gross domestic product at market prices, euro per capita. Accessed on September 28, 2017 http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=nama_10_pc

Eurostat (2017b). Total unemployment rate. Accessed on September 28, 2017, http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=tsdec450

Ferge, Z. (1997). ‘The Changed Welfare Paradigm: The Individualization of The Social.’ Social Policy & Administration 31: 20–44.

Fidrmuc, J. (1999). ‘Unemployment and the dynamics of political support for economic reforms.’ Journal of Policy Reform 3: 139-159.

Fidrmuc, J. (2000). ‘Political support for reforms. Economics of voting in transition countries.‘ European Economic Review 44: 1491-1513.

Fischer, S. and A. Gelb (1991). ‘The Process of Socialist Economic Transformation.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (4): 91-105.

Golinelli, R. and R. Rovelli (2013). ‘Did growth and reforms increase citizens’ support for the transition?’ European Journal of Political Economy 30: 112−137.

Hemerijck, A. (2013). Changing welfare states. Oxford University Press.

Hugh, S. and F. Sporri (2007). ‘Referendums, Trust, and Tax Evasion.’ Paper prepared for presentation at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops. Helsinki, May 7 - 12.

Inglot, T. (2008). Welfare States in East Central Europe, (19(19-(2004. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kaltenhalter, K.C., S.J. Ceccoli, and A. Michta (2006). ‘Explaining individual-level support for pivatization in European post-Soviet economies.‘ European Journal of Political Research 45: 1–29.

Kaufmann, D. and P. Siegelbaum (1996). ‘Privatization and Corruption in Transition Economies.’ Journal of International Affairs, 50(2): 419-458.

Kluegel, J.R., D.S. Mason, and B. Wegene (1999). ‘The Legitimation of Capitalism in the Postcommunist Transition. Public Opinion about Market Justice, (1991-(1996.’ European Sociological Review 15 (3): 251-283.

Kórnai, J. (1997). Struggle and Hope. Essays on Stabilization and Reform in a Post-socialist Economy. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (US): Edward Elgar.

Kuitto, K. (2016). Post-Communist Welfare States in European Context: Patterns of Welfare Policies in central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Legge, J.S., Jr. and H.G. Rainey (2003). ‚Privatization and Public Opinion in Germany,‘ Public Organization Review: A Global Journal 3: 127–149.

Lipsmeyer, C.S. and T. Nordstrom (2003). ‘East Versus West: Comparing Political Attitudes and Welfare Preferences across European Societies.’ Journal of European Public Policy 10 (3): 339–64.

Miller, A. H., Hesli, V., Reisinger, W. (1994). ‘Reassessing mass support for political and economic change in the former USSR.’ American Political Science Review 88 (2): 399-411.

Offe, C. (1996). Modernity and the State: East, West. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Orrenstein, M.A. (2001). Out of the Red. Building Capitalism and Democracy in Postcommunist Europe. Ann Arbor: The Michigan University Press.

Orrenstein, M.A. (2009). ‘What Happedned in East European (Political) Economies? A Balance Sheet for Neoliberal Reform.’East European Politics and Societies 23 (4): 479-490.

Oskarsen, M. (2007). ‘Social risk, policy disaffection and political alienation: A comparison of six European countries.’ Pp. 117-148 in Svallfors, S. (ed.) The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Orientations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Panizza, U. and M. Yañez (2005). ‚Why are Latin Americans so unhappy about reforms?‘ Journal of Applied Economics 8 (1): 1-29.

Raghunathan, T.E., J.M. Lepkowski, J. Van Hoewyk, and P. Solenberger (2001). ‘A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models.’ Survey Methodology 27: 85-95.

Renwick, A.G. and Tóka (1998). ‘East Meets West.’ Pp. 149-171 in Jowell, R. (ed.) International Social Attitudes: The 15th British Social Attitudes Report. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

Roland, G. (2002). ‘The Political Economy of Transition’. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1): 29-50.

Rose, R., W. Mishler and C. Haerpfner (1998). Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Rose, R. (2001). ‘How People View Democracy: A Diverging Europe.’ Journal of Democracy 12 (1): 93–106.

Rothstein, B. (1998). Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State (Theories of Institutional Design). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rovelli, R., and A. Zaiceva (2013). ‘Did support for economic and political reforms increase during the post-communist transition, and if so, why?’ Economics of Transition 21 (2): 193−240.

Saxonberg, S. (2005). ‘Transition Matters: Bringing Welfare Attitudes into the Debate.’ European Societies 7 (2): 287-319.

Saxonberg, S. (2007). ‘Post-Communist Welfare Attitudes: Was Czech Exceptionalism a Myth?’ East European Quarterly.41 (1): 81-115.

Saxonberg, S., T. Sirovátka and M. Janoušková (2013). ‘When do policies become path dependent? the Czech example.’ Journal of European Social Policy 23 (4): 437 –450.

Studlar, D.T., I. McAllister and A. Ascui (1990). ‘Privatization and the British Electorate: Microeconomic Policies, Macroeconomic Evaluations, and Party Support.’ American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 1077-1101.

Švejnar, J. (2002). ‘Transition Economies: Performance and Challenges.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1): 3-28.

Thompson, L. and R.C. Elling (2000). ‘Mapping Patterns of Support for Privatization in the Mass Public: The Case of Michigan.’ Public Administration Review 60 (4): 338-348.

Torgler, B. (2003). ‘Tax Morale in Transition Countries.’ Post-Communist Economies 15: 357-381.

Torgler, B. (2005). ‘Tax Morale and Direct Democracy.’ European Journal of Political Economy 21: 525-531.

Van Apeldoorn, B. (2002). Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle over European Integration. London: Routledge.

Vanhuysse, P. (2006). Divide and Pacify. Budapest: Central European University Press.

Vis, B., K. van Kersbergen and T. Hylands (2011). ‘To What Extent did the financial crisis intensify the pressure to reform the welfare state?’ Social Policy and Administration 45 (4): 338-353.

Williams, A.M. and V. Balaz (1999). ‘Privatisation in Central Europe: Different Methods, Legacies and Implications.’ Environment and Planning: Government and Policy 17 (6): 731-752.