Pagliacci, Francesco and Russo, Margherita (2018): Be (and have) good neighbours! Factors of vulnerability in the case of multiple hazards. Published in: Ecological Indicators , Vol. 111, No. April (2020): pp. 1-10.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_98044.pdf Download (613kB) | Preview |
Abstract
For any given territory, disaster risk is a function of hazard, exposure and vulnerability. The conceptual frameworks for these dimensions are largely debated in the scientific studies, focusing on spatial and temporal references and on system perspective of risk assessment. Despite broad in their scope, the analytical frameworks proposed to analyse policy programmes to reduce risk generally miss that risk indicators should be grounded on geographical and spatial features of the neighbouring territories and not only on communities' behaviour, and their resilience, as the paradigmatic solution in front of system events in areas prone to natural multi-hazard. The definition of "community" and of "neighbourhood" that are relevant for risk assessment cannot be simply defined in terms of absolute size of population or economic activity of individual local units under analysis or of the formal aggregation provided by jurisdictional agreements on specific functions. The paper presents an empirical analysis on spatially-lagged data in Italy, which was massively hit by adverse natural events in the last decade. It suggests to focus on social and material vulnerability, by using the comprehensive indicator at municipality level elaborated by the Italian Institute of Statistics. At the municipality-level, the analysis shows a positive correlation between multi-hazards, on the one hand, and spatially-lagged exposure and vulnerability, on the other. Thus, conditions in neighbouring municipalities would matter in prioritizing policy interventions aiming at mitigating hazard impacts, reducing vulnerability and enhancing communities' resilience. The definition of significant neighbouring spaces opens to a conceptualization of vulnerability grounded on a relational perspective in the creation of collective goods. This could enhance more effective Disaster Risk Reduction programmes.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Be (and have) good neighbours! Factors of vulnerability in the case of multiple hazards |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | social and material vulnerability indicators; multi-hazard; Disaster Risk Reduction; neighbouring effect |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy |
Item ID: | 98044 |
Depositing User: | Margherita Russo |
Date Deposited: | 11 Jan 2020 11:15 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jan 2020 11:15 |
References: | Anselin, L., 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. Anselin, L., 1995. Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geographical Analysis 27, 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x Bagnasco, A., 1977. Tre Italie: la problematica territoriale dello sviluppo italiano, Studi e ricerche. Soc. Ed. Il Mulino, Bologna. Barca, F., Casavola, P., Lucatelli, S., 2014. A strategy for inner areas in Italy: definition, objectives, tools and governance. Materiali Uval Series 31. Barone, G., Mocetti, S., 2014. Natural disasters, growth and institutions: A tale of two earthquakes. Journal of Urban Economics 84, 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2014.09.002 Becattini, G., Bellandi, M., De Propris, L. (Eds.), 2009. A Handbook of industrial districts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham ; Northampton (MA). Beccari, B., 2016. A Comparative Analysis of Disaster Risk, Vulnerability and Resilience Composite Indicators. PLoS Curr. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.453df025e34b682e9737f95070f9b970 Beck, M.W., Shepard, C.C., Birkman, J., Rhyner, J., Witting, M., Wolfertz, J., Martens, J., Maurer, K., Mucke, P., Radtke, K., 2012. World Risk Report 2012: Environmental degradation increases disaster risk worldwide - World. Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft, Bonn. Bertolini, P., Giovannetti, E., Martinelli, E., Palmirani, M., Pattaro, A.F., Russo, M., Sartori, L., 2016. Analisi degli effetti socio-economici del sisma, in: Unimore e Il Terremoto Del 2012 in Emilia-Romagna. Interventi e Ricerche per Fronteggiare l’emergenza e Sostenere La Ripresa. Carpi, pp. 209–221. Bertolini, P., M. Montanari, and V. Peragine (2008), Poverty and Social Exclusion in Rural Areas, Bruxelles: European Commission. Birkmann, J., 2007. Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: Applicability, usefulness and policy implications. Environmental Hazards 7, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.04.002 Bivand, R., Pebesma, E.J., Gómez-Rubio, V., 2008. Applied spatial data analysis with R, New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London. Bollin, C., Hidajat, R., 2006. Community-based risk index: Pilot implementation in Indonesia, in: Birkmann, J. (Ed.), Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards—Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. United Nations University, Tokyo ; New York, pp. 383–400. Bowman, A.O., Parsons, B.M., 2009. Vulnerability and Resilience in Local Government: Assessing the Strength of Performance Regimes. State and Local Briguglio, L., 1995. Small island developing states and their economic vulnerabilities 23, 1615–1632. Brusco, S., 1982. The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics 6, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035506 Cardona, O., D., 2005. Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management. Program for Latin America and the Caribbean: Summary Report for World Conference on Disaster Reduction. INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Manizales Instituto de Estudios Ambientales - IDEA, Manzilas. Cardona, O., Aalst, M., Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., Mcgregor, G., Perez, R., Pulwarty, R., Schipper, L., Sinh, B., 2012. Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability, in: Field, C. B. et al. (Ed.), Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, pp. 65–108. Civil Protection, 2015. Seismic classification. Available at http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/ jcms/ en/classificazione.wp (latest access: 11 Jan. 2017). Clarke, S.E., Chenoweth, E., 2006. The Politics of Vulnerability: Constructing Local Performance Regimes for Homeland Security. Review of Policy Research 23, 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00187.x Cliff, A.D., Ord, J.K., 1981. Spatial processes: models & applications. Pion, London. CNR-IRPI, 2015. Rapporto periodico sul rischio posto alla popolazione italiana da frane e inondazioni. Year 2014. Copus, A., Melo, P.C., Kaup, S., Tagai, G., Artelaris, P., 2015. Regional poverty mapping in Europe – Challenges, advances, benefits and limitations. Local Economy 30, 742–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094215601958 Costanza, R., Farley, J., 2007. Ecological economics of coastal disasters: Introduction to the special issue. Ecological Economics 63, 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.002 Cutter, S.L., Ash, K.D., Emrich, C.T., 2014. The geographies of community disaster resilience. Global Environmental Change 29, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005 Cutter, S.L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., Webb, J., 2008. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change 18, 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013 Cutter, S.L., Boruff, B.J., Shirley, W.L., 2003. Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Social Science Q 84, 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002 Cutter, S.L., Finch, C., 2008. Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 2301–2306. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710375105 Dao, Q.-H., Peduzzi, P., 2003. Global Risk And Vulnerability Index Trends per Year (GRAVITY) Phase IV: Annex to WVR and Multi Risk Integration. Esposito, F., Russo, M., Sargolini, M., Sartori, L., Virgili, V. (Eds.), 2017. Building Back Better: idee e percorsi per la costruzione di comunità resilienti. Carocci-Press online. Frigerio, I., De Amicis, M., 2016. Mapping social vulnerability to natural hazards in Italy: A suitable tool for risk mitigation strategies. Environmental Science & Policy 63, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.001 Fuchs, S., Röthlisberger, V., Thaler, T., Zischg, A., Keiler, M., 2017. Natural Hazard Management from a Coevolutionary Perspective: Exposure and Policy Response in the European Alps. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107, 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1235494 Füssel, H.-M., 2007. Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change 17, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002 Hirschman, A.O., 1958. The strategy of economic development, Yale Univ. Pr, New Haven. Hirschman, A.O., 1967. Development projects observed. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Istat, 2018. 8milacensus. Una selezione di indicatori per ogni comune d’Italia. Available at: http://ottomilacensus.istat.it/documentazione/ (latest access on Jan. 12, 2018) Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.J., 1990. Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J. Klein, J.A., Tucker, C.M., Steger, C.E., Nolin, A., Reid, R., Hopping, K.A., Yeh, E.T., Pradhan, M.S., Taber, A., Molden, D., Ghate, R., Choudhury, D., Alcántara-Ayala, I., Lavorel, S., Müller, B., Grêt-Regamey, A., Boone, R.B., Bourgeron, P., Castellanos, E., Chen, X., Dong, S., Keiler, M., Seidl, R., Thorn, J., Yager, K., 2019. An integrated community and ecosystem-based approach to disaster risk reduction in mountain systems. Environmental Science & Policy 94, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.034 Marin, G., Modica, M., Paleari, S., Zoboli, R., 2019. Disaster Risk Management: Building the ‘Disaster Risk Assessment Tool’ for Italy. SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies: Working Paper. Martin, R., Sunley, P., 2015. On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation. J Econ Geogr 15, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu015 Modica, M., Zoboli, R., 2016. Vulnerability, resilience, hazard, risk, damage, and loss: a socio-ecological framework for natural disaster analysis. Web Ecol. 16, 59–62. https://doi.org/10.5194/we-16-59-2016 Moran, P.A.P., 1950. Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena. Biometrika 37, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332142 Pagliacci, F., 2017. La pericolosità da disastri naturali nell’Italia rurale. Agriregionieuropa 13(51), 16–21. Pagliacci, F., Russo, M., 2019a. Multi-hazard, exposure and vulnerability in Italian municipalities, in: Borsekova, K., Nijkamp, P. (Eds.), Resilience and Urban Disaster: Surviving Cities, Edward Elgar, pp. 490–502. Pagliacci, F., Russo, M., 2019b. Socioeconomic effects of an earthquake: does spatial heterogeneity matter? Regional Studies 53, 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1462483 Pagliacci, F., Russo, M., Sartori, L., 2017. Social innovation and natural disasters: the “Casa Italia” Plan. Sociologia Urbana e Rurale 87–102. https://doi.org/10.3280/SUR2017-113006 Peduzzi, P., Dao, H., Herold, C., Mouton, F., 2009. Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the Disaster Risk Index. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 9, 1149–1159. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1149-2009 Perroux, F., 1987. L’espace et le temps dans la théorie générale des unités actives. Economie Appliquée. Russo, M., 1996. Units of investigation for local economic development policies. Éonomie Appliquée 85–118. Russo, M., Silvestri, P., 2017. Dati e strumenti di analisi per ricostruire meglio, in: Esposito, F., Russo, M., Sargolini, M., Sartori, L., Virgili, V. (Eds.), Building Back Better: Idee e Percorsi per La Costruzione Di Comunità Resilienti. Carocci-Press online, Rome, pp. 107–114. Schumacher, I., Strobl, E., 2011. Economic development and losses due to natural disasters: The role of hazard exposure. Ecological Economics 72, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.002 Shaw, R., Shiwaku, K., Izumi, T. (Eds.), 2018. Science and Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction in Asia: Potentials and Challenges. Academic Press, an imprint of Elsevier, London, United Kingdom. UNDRO (Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator), 1980. Natural disasters and vulnerability analysis: report of Expert Group Meeting (9-12 July 1979). [Geneva]: Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator. UNDRR United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2004. Living with Risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. UNO-Verl, New York. UNISDR United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015 - 2030. UNISDR, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017. Disaster Resilience Scorecard for Cities. Available at: https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/53349 [latest accessed on: April, 05th 2018] Valensise, G., Tarabusi, G., Guidoboni, E., Ferrari, G., 2017. The forgotten vulnerability: A geology- and history-based approach for ranking the seismic risk of earthquake-prone communities of the Italian Apennines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 25, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.014 Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., 2004. At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters, 2nd ed. ed. Routledge, London ; New York. Zimmermann, M., Keiler, M., 2015. International Frameworks for Disaster Risk Reduction: Useful Guidance for Sustainable Mountain Development? Mountain Research and Development 35, 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00006.1 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/98044 |