The economic enhancement of military sites and landscapes: what are the lessons of international practice?

Brau, Rinaldo and Statzu, Vania (2017): The economic enhancement of military sites and landscapes: what are the lessons of international practice? Published in:

Abstract

The presence of military assets characterizes the landscape of the areas where the asset is located also in socio-economic terms. In our analysis, we first distinguish between “historical” sites covering events up to the Second World War, and “recent sites” related to the Cold War. We also distinguish between tangible heritage, such as constructions and artefacts of various ages, and intangible heritage, mainly areas where battles and major military events took place. Battlefields form the core of a variety of tourism products: from cultural and educational tourism, to commemoration of events with re-enactment of battles, to the so-called “memory tourism”, up to the so-called “dark tourism”. We start with a short analysis of strategies adopted by public administration to dismantle and reuse historical military sites, focusing on the shift from a totally public management to the gradual involvement of privates. Usually, reuse of historical sites is addressed to tourism and cultural purposes. Then, we focus on the Cold War heritage, characterised by larger areas, important infrastructures and high environmental contamination. Private investment is fundamental to the reuse and management of these sites. A wide range of possibility of reuse has been identified. Finally, we analyse battlefield-related tourism megatrends. Our analysis aims to make a review of reuse of military sites, especially where economic data are available to verify the amount of resources used or catalysed by the reuse of a military sites. During the analysis, we will proceed to identify the main characteristics of the reuse process. These and other information will be useful to derive general indications on what are the economic potentials (and limits) of Sardinian military vestments, considered in their dual nature of tangible asset and intangible heritage. In addition, we discuss the application of economic valuation tools to closure and reuse of military sites.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: economic valuation analysis, military heritage, public-private partnership, environmental and urban planning
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation ; Social Discount Rate; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H44 - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O21 - Planning Models ; Planning Policy

References

Asteris, Michael, Clark, David and Jaffry, Shabbar. “The Economic Effect of Military Facility Contraction: A Naval Case Study”. Defence and Peace Economics (2016):1-26 doi: 10.1080/10242694.2015.1122281

Basarin, V. John and Hall, John. “The business of battlefield tourism”. Deakin business review 1(2008):45-55. http://dro.deakin.edu.au/view/DU:30017802

Bureau of Economic Analysis. REGIONAL MULTIPLIERS-A User Handbook for the Regional Input-Output Modeling System (RIMS II). (1997) Accessed May 18, 2017. https://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/regional/perinc/meth/rims2.pdf

Cidell, Julie. The conversion of military bases to commercial airports: existing conversions and future possibilities. Journal of Transport Geography 11(2003):93-102 doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00071-6

Daddi, Pierluigi, d’Agostino, Giorgio and Pieroni, Luca. “Does military spending stimulate growth? An empirical investigation in Italy”. Defence and Peace Economics (2016):1-20 doi:10.1080/10242694.2016.1158438

Department of Defense (DoD), US Government. California Military Base Reuse. (2009) Accessed May 18, 2017. https://www.dtsc.ca.gov/OMF/upload/Brochure-no-CL.pdf

Durkley, Ria, Morgan, Nigel, Westwood, Sheena. “Visiting the trenches: exploring meanings and motivations in battlefield tourism”. Tourism Management 32(2011):860-868 doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.07.011

(EPSYS) Inc. Economic Impact Analysis of Delayed Military Base Reuse in California (2005) Accessed May 18, 2017. https://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/0504MilitaryBaseCA.pdf

European Union. The Economic Benefits of Natura 2000. (2013) Accessed May 18, 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/financing/docs/ENV-12-018_LR_Final1.pdf

Foulk, David. “The impact of the “economy of history”: The example of battlefield tourism in France”. Mondes du Tourisme 12(2016) https://tourisme.revues.org/1338

Korczak, Jerzy. “Regeneration of military sites as a factor in the improvement of the town’s logistics infrastructure”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 151(2014):158-171 doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.016

Ivona, Antonietta. Fari dismessi. Dall’abbandono alla rigenerazione. Annali del Turismo V 1(2016):93-110

Lee, Jim. “The Regional Economic Effects of Military Base Realignments and Closures”. Defence and Peace Economics (2016):1-18 doi:10.1080/10242694.2016.1170335

Paloyo, Alfredo R., Vance, Colin and Vorell, Matthias. “The regional economic effects of military base realignments and closures in Germany”. Defence and Peace Economics 21(2010):5-6, 567-579 doi:10.1080/10242694.2010.524778

Pollo, Riccardo. La cessione del patrimonio immobiliare pubblico: la riconversione dei siti militari. Techne 3(2012):216-223

Seaton, Antony V. “War and Thanatourism: Waterloo 1815-1914”. Annals of Tourism Research 26(1999):130-158 Accessed May 18, 2017 doi:10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00057-7

Venier, Ivana. Il riuso delle aree militari dimesse: la questione di Pola. Quale ruolo per forme di pianificazione effimera? Milano: Franco Angeli, 2012

Woodward, Rachel. “Military landscapes: Agendas and approaches for future research”. Progress in Human Geography 38(2014):40–61 doi:0.1177/0309132513493219