Kölle, Felix (2020): Governance and Group Conflict.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_98859.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Many situations in the social and economic life are characterized by rivalry and conflict between two or more competing groups. Warfare, socio-political conflicts, political elections, lobbying, and R&D competitions are all examples of inter-group conflicts in which groups spend scarce and costly resources to gain an advantage over other groups. Here, we report on an experiment that investigates the impact of political institutions within groups on the development of conflict between groups. We find that relative to the case in which group members can decide individually on their level of conflict engagement, conflict significantly intensifies when investments are determined democratically by voting or when a single group member (the dictator) can decide on behalf of the group. These results hold for both symmetric and asymmetric contests, as well as for situations in which institutions are adopted exogenously or endogenously. Our findings thus suggest that giving people the possibility to vote is not the main reason for why democracies seem to engage in less wars than autocracies. Nevertheless, when giving participants the possibility to choose which institution to adopt, we find that the voting institution is the by far most popular one as it combines the desirable features of autonomy and equality.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Governance and Group Conflict |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Conflict, competition, institutions, democracy, groups, experiment |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior |
Item ID: | 98859 |
Depositing User: | Felix Kölle |
Date Deposited: | 29 Feb 2020 15:51 |
Last Modified: | 29 Feb 2020 15:51 |
References: | Abbink, K., J. Brandts, B. Herrmann, and H. Orzen (2010). Intergroup conflict and intragroup punishment in an experimental contest game. American Economic Review 100(1), 420–447. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of economic growth 1, 385–472. Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67(5), 422. Aumann, R. (1959). Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games, Volume 4. Princeton University Press. Baik, K. H. (1993). Effort levels in contests: The public-good prize case. Economics Letters 41(4), 363–367. Balliet, D. (2010). Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Conflict Resolution 54(1), 39–57. Bardhan, P. (2000). Irrigation and cooperation: An empirical analysis of 48 irrigation communities in south india. Economic Development and cultural change 48(4), 847–865. Bartling, B., E. Fehr, and H. Herz (2014). The intrinsic value of decision rights. Econometrica 82(6), 2005–2039. Bass, B. M. (2009). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press. Bernard, M., A. Dreber, P. Strimling, and K. Eriksson (2013). The subgroup problem: When can binding voting on extractions from a common pool resource overcome the tragedy of the commons? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 91, 122–130. Bernheim, B. D., B. Peleg, and M. D. Whinston (1987). Coalition-proof nash equilibria i. concepts. Journal of Economic Theory 42(1), 1–12. Bolton, G. E. and A. Ockenfels (2000). ERC - A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. American Economic Review 100(1), 166–93. Brams, S. and P. C. Fishburn (2007). Approval voting. Springer Science & Business Media. Brams, S. J. and P. C. Fishburn (1978). Approval voting. American Political Science Review 72(3), 831–847. Cason, T. N., R. M. Sheremeta, and J. Zhang (2012). Communication and efficiency in competitive coordination games. Games and Economic Behavior 76(1), 26–43. Cason, T. N., R. M. Sheremeta, and J. Zhang (2017). Asymmetric and endogenous communication in competition between groups. Experimental Economics 20, 946–972. Christman, J. (2008). Autonomy in moral and political philosophy. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Cooper, D. J. and J. Kagel (2016). Other-regarding preferences. The Handbook of Experimental Economics 2, 217. Dal Bo, P., A. Foster, and L. Putterman (2010). Institutions and behavior: Experimental evidence on the effects of democracy. American Economic Review 100(5), 2205–29. De Mesquita, B. B., J. D. Morrow, R. M. Siverson, and A. Smith (1999). An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review 93(4), 791–807. Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman, and U. Sunde (2010). Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? American Economic Review 100(3), 1238–60. Eisenkopf, G. (2014). The impact of management incentives in intergroup contests. European Economic Review 67, 42–61. Fallucchi, F., E. Renner, and M. Sefton (2013). Information feedback and contest structure in rent-seeking games. European Economic Review 64, 223–240. Fehr, E. and S. Gächter (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90(4), 980–994. Fehr, E. and K. Schmidt (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 817–868. Fehr, E. and K. M. Schmidt (2006). The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism - experimental evidence and new theories. In S. Kolm and J. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism, and Reciprocity, Volume 1, pp. 615–691. Elsevier. Feinberg, J. (1978). Freedom and behavior control. In Encyclopedia of Bioethics, pp. 93–100. Reich, Warren T. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2), 117–140. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10(2), 171–178. Fonseca, M. A. (2009). An experimental investigation of asymmetric contests. International Journal of Industrial Organization 27(5), 582–591. Gächter, S. and E. Renner (2003). Leading by example in the presence of free rider incentives. Garfinkel, M. R. and S. Skaperdas (2007). Economics of conflict: An overview. Handbook of defense economics 2, 649–709. Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with Orsee. Journal of the Economic Science Association 1, 1–12. Gürtler, O. (2008). On sabotage in collective tournaments. Journal of Mathematical Economics 44(3-4), 383–393. Hardin, G. (1968). Tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248. Hauser, O. P., D. G. Rand, A. Peysakhovich, and M. A. Nowak (2014). Cooperating with the future. Nature 511(7508), 220–223. Heine, F. and A. Riedl (2019). Let’s (not) escalate this! intergroup leadership in a team contest. Working Paper. Jackson, M. O. and M. Morelli (2007). Political bias and war. American Economic Review 97(4), 1353–1373. Katz, E., S. Nitzan, and J. Rosenberg (1990). Rent-seeking for pure public goods. Public Choice 65(1), 49–60. Konrad, K. A. (2009). Strategy and dynamics in contests. Oxford University Press. Kosfeld, M., A. Okada, and A. Riedl (2009). Institution formation in public goods games. The American Economic Review 99(4), 1335–1355. Laslier, J.-F. and M. R. Sanver (2010). Handbook on approval voting. Springer Science & Business Media. Laslier, J.-F. and K. Van der Straeten (2008). A live experiment on approval voting. Experimental Economics 11(1), 97–105. Leibbrandt, A. and L. Sääksvuori (2012). Communication in intergroup conflict. European Economic Review 56(6), 1136–1147. Lewin, K., R. Lippitt, and R. K. White (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. The Journal of social psychology 10(2), 269–299. Loewenstein, G. F., L. Thompson, and M. H. Bazerman (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(3), 426. Maoz, Z. and B. Russett (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review 87(3), 624–638. Markussen, T., L. Putterman, and J.-R. Tyran (2013). Self-organization for collective action: An experimental study of voting on sanction regimes. Review of Economic Studies 81(1), 301–324. Mellizo, P., J. Carpenter, and P. H. Matthews (2014). Workplace democracy in the lab. Industrial Relations Journal 45(4), 313–328. Miller, K. I. and P. R. Monge (1986). Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal 29(4), 727–753. 36M¨unster, J. (2009). Group contest success functions. Economic Theory 41(2), 345–357. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press. Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, and J. Walker (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. University of Michigan Press. Ostrom, E., J. Walker, and R. Gardner (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American political science Review 86(2), 404–417. Owen, J. M. (1994). How liberalism produces democratic peace. International security 19(2), 87–125. Ramsbotham, O., H. Miall, and T. Woodhouse (2011). Contemporary conflict resolution. Polity. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard university press. Russett, B. (1993). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-Cold War world. Princeton University Press. Ryan, R. M. and E. L. Deci (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55(1), 68. Sausgruber, R., A. Sonntag, and J.-R. Tyran (2019). Disincentives from redistribution: Evidence on a dividend of democracy. Sheremeta, R. M. (2018). Behavior in group contests: A review of experimental research. Journal of Economic Surveys 32(3), 683–704. Sherif, M., O. J. Harvey, B. J. White, W. R. Hood, and C. W. Sherif (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma. Sobel, J. (2005). Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Literature 43(2), 392–436. Sutter, M., S. Haigner, and M. G. Kocher (2010). Choosing the carrot or the stick? endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations. The Review of Economic Studies 77(4), 1540–1566. Sutter, M. and C. Strassmair (2009). Communication, cooperation and collusion in team tournaments-an experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior 66(1), 506–525. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual review of psychology 33(1), 1–39. Torgler, B. (2005). Tax morale and direct democracy. European Journal of Political Economy 21(2), 525–531. Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Economic Inquiry 5(3), 224–232. Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent-seeking. In Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. Texas A&M University Press. Tyran, J.-R. and L. P. Feld (2006). Achieving compliance when legal sanctions are non-deterrent. scandinavian Journal of Economics 108(1), 135–156. Van Vugt, M., S. F. Jepson, C. M. Hart, and D. De Cremer (2004). Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability. Journal of experimental social psychology 40(1), 1–13. Walker, J. M., R. Gardner, A. Herr, and E. Ostrom (2000). Collective choice in the commons: Experimental results on proposed allocation rules and votes. The Economic Journal 110(460), 212–234. Weber, R. J. (1995). Approval voting. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(1), 39–49. Young, R. (1982). The value of autonomy. The Philosophical Quarterly 32(126), 35–44. Yukl, G. A. (1998). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/98859 |