Competition for Context-Sensitive Consumers

Apffelstaedt, Arno and Mechtenberg, Lydia (2016): Competition for Context-Sensitive Consumers.

Abstract

When preferences are sensitive to context, firms may try to influence purchase decisions by designing the environment of consumption choices. Confirming anecdotal evidence on retailer marketing tricks, we show that competitive retailers exploit context-sensitivity by designing environments that drive a wedge between preferences before and after entering a store. This wedge induces naive consumers to switch preference from a loss-leader product that attracts consumers into the store to a more profitable product. Depending on the quality preferences and budget of consumers, markets are either in an "up-selling" or "down-selling" equilibrium. In the former, firms attract consumers with low-quality products, compete on prices, and design context to ultimately sell a product of higher price. In the latter, firms attract consumers with high-price products, compete on quality, and design context to ultimately sell a product of lower quality. When modeling context-sensitivity according to the theories of Salience, Focusing, or Relative Thinking, designing context comes down to the introduction of a single decoy product. This decoy draws consumer attention at the store to the favorable attributes of the product the firm aims to sell.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Choice Context, Retailer Competition, Up-Selling, Down-Selling, Decoys, Naiveté
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D41 - Perfect Competition

References

Ariely, Dan. 2008. Predictably Irrational. New York:Harper Collins

Ariely, Dan, George Loewenstein, and Drazen Prelec. 2003. “Coherent Arbitrariness: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1): 74–105.

Bordalo, Pedro, Nicola Gennaioli, and Andrei Shleifer. 2013. “Salience and Consumer Choice.” Journal of Political Economy, 121(5): 803–843.

Bordalo, Pedro, Nicola Gennaioli, and Andrei Shleifer. 2016. “Competition for Attention.” Review of Economic Studies, 83: 481–513.

Bushong, Benjamin, Matthew Rabin, and Joshua Schwartzstein. 2016. “A Model of Relative Thinking.” mimeo (This version: March 31, 2016).

Chetty, Ray. 2015. “Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 20928, February 2015.

Chevalier, Judith A., Anil K. Kashyap, and Peter E. Rossi. 2003. “Why Don’t Prices Rise During Periods of Peak Demand? Evidence from Scanner Data.” American Economic Review, 93(1): 15–37.

DellaVigna, Stefano, and Ulrike Malmendier. 2004. “Contract Design and Self-Control: Theory and Evidence.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2): 353–402.

DellaVigna, Stefano, and Ulrike Malmendier. 2006. “Paying Not to Go to the Gym.” American Economic Review, 96(3): 694–719.

Doyle, John R., David J. O’Connor, Gareth M. Reynolds, and Paul A. Bottomley. 1999. “The Robustness of the Asymmetrically Dominated Effect: Buying Frames, Phantom Alternatives, and In-Store Purchases.” Psychology and Marketing, 16(3): 225–243.

Eliaz, Kfir, and Ran Spiegler. 2006. “Contracting with Diversly Naive Agents.” Review of Economic Studies, 73: 689–714.

Ellison, Glen, and Sarah Fisher Ellison. 2009. “Search, Obfuscation, and Price Elasticities on the Internet.” Econometrica, 77(2): 427–452.

Ellison, Glenn, and Alexander Wolitzky. 2012. “A Search Cost Model of Obfuscation.” RAND Journal of Economics, 43(3): 417–441.

Gottlieb, Daniel. 2008. “Competition over Time-Inconsistent Consumers.” Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10(4): 673–684.

Gul, Faruk, and Wolfgang Pesendorfer. 2001. “Temptation and Self-Control.” Econometrica, 69(6): 1403–1435.

Heidhues, Paul, and Botond Koszegi. 2010. “Exploiting Naivete about Self-Control in the Credit Market.” American Economic Review, 100(5): 2279–2303.

Herne, Kaisa. 1999. “The Effects of Decoy Gambles on Individual Choice.” Experimental Economics, 2: 31–40.

Hosken, Daniel, David Matsa, and David Reiffen. 2000. “How do Retailers Adjust Prices?: Evidence from Store-Level Data.” Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Economics Working Paper No. 230, January 2000.

Huber, Joel, John W. Payne, and Christopher Puto. 1982. “Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis.” Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1): 90–98.

Jahedi, Salar. 2011. “A Taste for Bargains.” mimeo.

Kamenica, Emir. 2008. “Contextual Inference in Markets: On the Informational Content of Product Lines.” American Economic Review, 98(5): 2127–2149.

Koszegi, Botond, and Adam Szeidl. 2013. “A Model of Focusing in Economic Choice.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1): 53–104.

Lal, Rajiv, and Carmen Matutes. 1994. “Retail Pricing and Advertising Strategies.” Journal of Business, LXVII(1994): 345–370.

Mazar, Nina, Botond Koszegi, and Dan Ariely. 2014. “True Context-Dependent Preferences? The Causes of Market-Dependent Valuations.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(4): 200–208.

Meyers-Levy, Joan, Rui Zhu, and Lan Jiang. 2010. “Context Effects from Bodily Sensations: Examining Bodily Sensations Induced by Flooring and the Moderating Role of Product Viewing Distance.” Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1): 1057–1091.

Piccione, Michele, and Ran Spiegler. 2012. “Price Competition under Limited Comparability.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1): 97–135.

Simonson, Itamar. 1989. “Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2): 158–174.

Simonson, Itamar, and Amos Tversky. 1992. “Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion.” Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3): 281–295.

Spiegler, Ran. 2014. “Competitive Framing.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(3): 35–58.

Turley, L.W., and Ronald E. Milliman. 2000. “Atmospheric Effects on Shopping Behavior: A Review of the Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Business Research, 49: 193–211.

Wolfe, Jeremy M., and Todd S. Horowitz. 2004. “What Attributes Guide the Development of Visual Attention and How Do They Do It?” Nature: Reviews Neuroscience, 5: 495–501.