Cabrera, José María and Caffera, Marcelo and Cid, Alejandro (2020): Small Incentives May Have Large Effects: The Impact of Prices on the Demand for Plastic Bags.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100178.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Improper disposition of single-use plastic bags causes significant environmental impacts. Awareness of these detrimental effects has increased, according to the number of policies to reduce the consumption of plastics bags implemented worldwide. Yet, impact evaluations of these initiatives are scarce. This is particularly true for evaluations of the impact of levies on plastic bags. In this paper, we quantify, for the first time, the impact of pricing disposable plastic bags on the quantity used over a one-year time window with respect to a pre-treatment period of no regulation. Specifically, we evaluate the effect of different prices on the number of single-use plastic bags used by customers of a national supermarket chain, before and after it implemented a staggered rollout across the country. Using a difference-in-difference identification strategy, we estimate a sizable drop in the demand of single-use plastic bags in the range of 70% to 85%, compared to the control group of branches that did not price plastic bags. These estimates do not change in magnitude and are statistically robust to (i) different specifications of our basic equation, (ii) the use of synthetic controls as an alternative identification strategy, (iii) the estimation of anticipation effects, and (iv) placebo tests. We do not find evidence consistent with the effect been driven by a loss of sales. Our estimates are consistent with the evidence of large elasticities around zero prices found in other settings.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Small Incentives May Have Large Effects: The Impact of Prices on the Demand for Plastic Bags |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | plastic bags, price, regulation, consumer behavior, difference in difference, synthetic controls, anticipation effects |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D04 - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation, Implementation, and Evaluation D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling |
Item ID: | 100178 |
Depositing User: | José María Cabrera |
Date Deposited: | 09 May 2020 13:05 |
Last Modified: | 09 May 2020 13:05 |
References: | Abadie, A. (2019). Using Synthetic Controls: Feasibility, Data Requirements, and Methodological Aspects, Journal of Economic Literature, forthcoming. Abadie, A. & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113-132. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2009). The experimental approach to development economics. Annu. Rev. Econ., 1(1), 151-178. Barnes, D. K., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., & Barlaz, M. (2009). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1985-1998. Bueno, M., & Valente, M. (2019). The effects of pricing waste generation: A synthetic control approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 96, 274-285. Centro Comercial e Industrial de Salto (2018). Información práctica sobre la Campaña “Somos limpios, somos felices”. Convery, F., McDonnell, S., & Ferreira, S. (2007). The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 38(1), 1-11. Diario El Pueblo (2018). “De manera dispar comenzó la aplicación de la campaña que busca disminuir el uso de bolsas de nylon en los comercios. April 3, 2018. Dikgang, J., Leiman, A., & Visser, M. (2012a). Elasticity of demand, price and time: lessons from South Africa's plastic-bag levy. Applied Economics, 44(26), 3339-3342. Dikgang, J., Leiman, A., & Visser, M. (2012b). Analysis of the plastic-bag levy in South Africa. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 66, 59-65. El Observador (2019). Arranca el cobro de las bolsas aunque estas no se ajustan a los requisitos de la ley. April 1, 2019. Goodman-Bacon, A. (2019). Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing. Goodman-Bacon, A., Goldring, T. & Nichols, A. (2019) bacondecomp: Stata module for Decomposing difference-in-differences estimation with variation in treatment timing. He, H. (2012). Effects of environmental policy on consumption: lessons from the Chinese plastic bag regulation. Environment and Development Economics, 17, 407-431. Holla, A., & Kremer, M. (2009). Pricing and access: Lessons from randomized evaluations in education and health. Center for Global Development working paper, (158). Homonoff, T. A. (2018). Can Small Incentives Have Large Effects? The Impact of Taxes versus Bonuses on Disposable Bag Use. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(4), 177-210. Homonoff, T., Kao, L. S., Selman, J., D., & Seybolt, C. (2020). Skipping the Bag: The Relative Effectiveness of Bans versus Taxes Intendencia de Salto (2018). Resolución Municipal 074/18 Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2018). Encuesta Continua de Hogares. Jakovcevic, A., Steg, L., Mazzeo, N., Caballero, R., Franco, P., Putrino, N., & Favara, J. (2014). Charges for plastic bags: motivational and behavioral effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 372-380. Lönnstedt, O. M., & Eklöv, P. (2016). Environmentally relevant concentrations of microplastic particles influence larval fish ecology. Science, 352(6290), 1213-1216. Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133-1165. Martinho, G., Balaia, N., & Pires, A. (2017). The Portuguese plastic carrier bag tax: The effects on consumers’ behavior. Waste management, 61, 3-12. Moore, C. J. (2008). Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environmental research, 108(2), 131-139. Nielsen, T. D., Holmberg, K., & Stripple, J. (2019). Need a bag? A review of public policies on plastic carrier bags–Where, how and to what effect? Waste management, 87, 428-440. Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., & Suffolk, C. (2013). The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: Attitude change and behavioural spillover effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 240-247. Rivers, N., Shenstone-Harris, S., & Young, N. (2017). Using nudges to reduce waste? The case of Toronto's plastic bag levy. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 153-162. Shampanier, K., Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2007). Zero as a special price: The true value of free products. Marketing science, 26(6), 742-757. Taylor, R. L. (2019). Bag leakage: The effect of disposable carryout bag regulations on unregulated bags. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 254-271 Taylor, R. L. (2020). A Mixed Bag: The Hidden Time Costs of Regulating Consumer Behavior. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 7(2), 345-378. Taylor, R. L., & Villas-Boas, S. B. (2016). Bans vs. Fees: Disposable Carryout Bag Policies and Bag Usage. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 38(2), 351-372. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039-1061. UNEP (2014). Valuing Plastics: The Business Case for Measuring, Managing and Disclosing Plastic Use in the Consumer Goods Industry. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/9238 UNEP (2018). From birth to ban: A history of the plastic shopping bag. http://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/birth-ban-history-plastic-shopping-bag UNEP (2018). Legal Limits on Single-use Plastics and Microplastics: A Global Review of National Laws and Regulations http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/27113 Xanthos, D., & Walker, T. R. (2017). International policies to reduce plastic marine pollution from single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads): A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 118, 17–26. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100178 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Small Incentives May Have Large Effects: The Impact of Prices on the Demand for Plastic Bags. (deposited 09 May 2020 13:05) [Currently Displayed]