Fosgerau, Mogens and Hess, Stephane (2008): Competing methods for representing random taste heterogeneity in discrete choice models.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_10038.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper reports the findings of a systematic study using Monte Carlo experiments and a real dataset aimed at comparing the performance of various ways of specifying random taste heterogeneity in a discrete choice model. Specifically, the analysis compares the performance of two recent advanced approaches against a background of four commonly used continuous distribution functions. The first of these two approaches improves on the flexibility of a base distribution by adding in a series approximation using Legendre polynomials. The second approach uses a discrete mixture of multiple continuous distributions. Both approaches allows the researcher to increase the number of parameters as desired. The paper provides a range of evidence on the ability of the various approaches to recover various distributions from data. The two advanced approaches are comparable in terms of the likelihoods achieved, but each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Competing methods for representing random taste heterogeneity in discrete choice models |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | random taste heterogeneity; mixed logit; method of sieves; mixtures of distributions |
Subjects: | R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R40 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General |
Item ID: | 10038 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Mogens Fosgerau |
Date Deposited: | 15 Aug 2008 00:00 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 03:05 |
References: | Bierens, H. J. (2007) Semi-nonparametric interval-censored mixed proportional hazard models: Identification and consistency results, Econometric Theory, Forthcoming. Bierlaire, M. (2003) BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models, Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verit`a, Ascona. Chen, X. (2006) Large sample sieve estimation of semi-nonparametric models, in Handbook of Econometrics, forthcoming edn. Cirillo, C. and K. W. Axhausen (2006) Evidence on the distribution of values of travel time savings from a six-week diary, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40 (5) 444–457. Coppejans, M. (2001) Estimation of the binary response model using a mixture of distributions estimator (mod), Journal of Econometrics, 102 (2) 231–269. Cranley, R. (1976) Randomization of number theoretic methods for multiple integrations, Siam Journal on Numerical Analysis, 13 (6) 904–914. De Borger, B. and M. Fosgerau (2008) The trade-off between money and travel time: a test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences, Journal of Urban Economics, Forthcoming. Doornik, J. A. (2001) Ox: An Object-Oriented Matrix Language, Timberlake Consultants Press, London. Fosgerau, M. (2006) Investigating the distribution of the value of travel time savings, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 40 (8) 688–707. Fosgerau, M. and M. Bierlaire (2007) A practical test for the choice of mixing distribution in discrete choice models, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41 (7) 784–794. Fosgerau, M. and S. F. Nielsen (2006) Deconvoluting preferences and errors: a semi-nonparametric model for binomial data, Econometric Society European Meeting 2006. Gallant, A. R. and D. W. Nychka (1987) Semi-nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation, Econometrica, 55 (2) 363–390. Geweke, J. and M. Keane (2001) Computationally intensive methods for integration in econometrics, in J. L. Heckman and E. Leamer (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, chap. 56, 3463–3568, Elsevier, Amsterdam. Hensher, D. A. (2006) Reducing Sign Violation for VTTS Distributions through Recognition of an Individual’s Attribute Processing Strategy, ITLS working paper, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney. Hensher, D. A. and W. H. Greene (2003) The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice, Transportation, 30 (2) 133–176. Hess, S., K. W. Axhausen and J. W. Polak (2006a) Distributional assumptions in Mixed Logit modelling, paper presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Hess, S., M. Bierlaire and J. W. Polak (2005) Estimation of value of travel-time savings using mixed logit models, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39 (2-3) 221–236. Hess, S., M. Bierlaire and J. W. Polak (2006b) A systematic comparison of continuous and discrete mixture models, paper presented at the 11th International Conference of Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan. Klein, R. W. and R. H. Spady (1993) An efficient semiparametric estimator for binary response models, Econometrica, 61 (2) 387–421. McFadden, D. and K. Train (2000) Mixed MNL Models for discrete response, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 447–470. Revelt, D. and K. Train (1998) Mixed Logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (4) 647–657. Train, K. (1998) Recreation demand models with taste differences over people, Land Economics, 74, 185–194. Train, K. (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. Train, K. and G. Sonnier (2005) Mixed logit with bounded distributions of correlated partworths, in R. Scarpa and A. Alberini (eds.), Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, chap. 7, 117–134, Springer Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/10038 |