Current account sustainability for 21 African economies: Evidence based on nonlinear flexible Fourier stationarity and unit-root tests

Husein, Jamal (2020): Current account sustainability for 21 African economies: Evidence based on nonlinear flexible Fourier stationarity and unit-root tests.

Abstract

We examine the mean reversion properties in the current account balance as a percentage of GDP under assumptions of smooth breaks and nonlinearity for twenty one African economies. Since there are reasons to indicate that the dynamic adjustment in the current account may follow a nonlinear process, we utilize a range of nonlinear stationarity and unit-root tests and compare across them to obtain a comprehensive picture of the pattern characterizing imbalances in part of the region. In particular, we apply the newly introduced Fourier stationarity test of Tsong, Lee, and Tsai (2019) in conjunction with Enders and Lee (2012a and 2012b) and Rodrigues and Taylor (2012) Fourier unit-root tests. However, rather than assuming a nonlinear current account adjustment, we test for “nonlinearity” using an approach that is robust to whether the current account series are stationary or integrated. We find strong evidence in favor of nonlinearity in eighteen current accounts out of the twenty one examined. Our empirical results show that the traditional linear and the widely used nonlinear unit-root tests of Kapetanios et al. (2003), Sollis (2009), and Kruse (2011) confirm sustainability of the current account balance for a small number of countries. Meanwhile, the Fourier based stationarity and unit-root tests confirm sustainability in a much larger group of countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Unit-root, Stationarity, Fourier approximation, Current account
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F32 - Current Account Adjustment ; Short-Term Capital Movements

References

Akdoğan, K., (2014). Threshold adjustment in the current account: sustainability for danger zone economies?, Applied Economics Letters, 21:14, 1006-1009. Astill, S., Harvey, D. I., Leybourne, S. J. & Taylor, A. M. (2015). Robust and Powerful Tests for Nonlinear Deterministic Components, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 77, 780-799. Amsler, C. and Lee, J. (1995). An LM test for a unit root in the presence of a structural change, Econometric Theory, 11, 359–368 Baharumshah, A. Z., Lau, E., & Fountas, S. (2003). On the Sustainability of Current Account Deficits: Evidence from Four ASEAN Countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 14, 465-487. Becker, R., Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2006). A Stationarity Test in the Presence of an Unknown Number of Smooth Breaks, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27-3, 383-409. Becker, R., Enders, W. and Hurn, S., (2004). A General Test for Time Dependence in Parameters, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19, 7, 899–906. Bhargava, A. (1986). On the theory of testing for unit roots in observed time series, The Review of Economics Studies, 53, 3, 369-384. Bohn, H. (2007). Are Stationarity and Cointegration Restrictions Really Necessary for the Intertemporal Budget Constraint?, Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 1837–47. Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L., A. Sanso, and M. Artis (2001). Unit Root and Stationarity Test and stationarity tests’ wedding, Economics Letters, 70, 1-8. Carrion-i-Silvestre, J.L., Sansó, A. (2006). A guide to the computation of stationarity tests, Empirical Economics, 31, 433–448. Cavaliere, G., Harvey, D., Leybourne, S., & Taylor, A. (2011). Testing for unit roots in the presence of a possible break in trend and nonstationary volatility. Econometric Theory, 27(5), 957-991. Cecen, A., & Xiao, L. (2014). Capital flows and current account dynamics in Turkey: A nonlinear time series analysis, Economic Modelling, 39, 240–246 Chen, S. -W. (2014). Smooth transition, nonlinearity and current account sustainability: Evidence from the European countries. Economic Modelling, 38, 541–554. Chortareas, G. E., Kapetanios, G., & Uctum, M. (2004). An investigation of current account solvency in Latin America using nonlinear nonstationarity tests, Studies in non-linear dynamics and econometrics 8. (Article4). Christopoulos, D. K., & León-Ledesma, M. (2010). Current account sustainability in the US: What do we really know about it? Journal of International Money and Finance, 29, 442–459. Clarida, R. H., Goretti, M., & Taylor, M. P. (2006). Are there thresholds of current account adjustment in the G7? G7 current account imbalances: Sustainability and adjustment, 169–203 (Chapter 5 in NBER book). Cuestas, J. C. (2013). The current account sustainability of European transition economies, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51, 232–245. Davies, R. B., (1987). Hypothesis Testing when a Nuisance Parameter is Present Only Under the Alternative, Biometrika, 74 , 1, 33–43. Dickey, D. A., & W. A. Fuller (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431. Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J. and Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root, Econometrica, 64, 813–836. Enders, W., & Lee, J., 2012a. The flexible Fourier form and Dickey-Fuller type unit root test. Economic Letters, 117, 196–199. Enders, W., & Lee, J., 2012b. A Unit Root Test Using a Fourier Series to Approximate Smooth Breaks, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74-4, 574-599. Enders, W. and Siklos, P. L., (2000). Cointegration and Threshold Adjustment, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 19, 2, 166-176 Gallant, A. R. 1981. On the Bias in the Flexible Functional Forms and an Essentially Unbiased form; the Flexible Fourier Form, Journal of Econometrics, 15, 211-245. Hakkio, C.S. (1995). The US Current Account: The Other Deficit, Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 80, 11-24. Harris, D., D.I. Harvey, S.J. Leybourne, & A.M.R. Taylor (2009) Testing for a unit root in the of a possible break in trend, Econometric Theory, 25, 1545-1588. Holmes, M. J., Otero, J., & Panagiotidis, T. (2010). On the sustainability of current account deficits in the European Union, Review of International Economics, 18, 730–740. Holmes, M.J., Panagiotidis, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). The sustainability of India's current account, Applied Economics. 43, 219 - 229. Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y., & Snell, A. (2003). Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework, Journal of Econometrics, 112, 359–379. Kim, B. H. , Min, H. G. , Hwang, Y. S. , & McDonald, J. A. (2009). Are Asian Countries’ Current Accounts Sustainable? Deficits, Even When Associated with High Investment, are not Costless, Journal of Policy Modelling, 31-2, 163–179. Kruse, R. (2011). A new unit root test against ESTAR based on a class of modified statistics, Statistical Papers 52, 1, 71–85 . Kwiatkowski, D., P. C. B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin, (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure are we that Economic Time Series have a Unit Root?, Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159–178. Leybourne, S. J., and B. P. M. McCabe. (1994). A Consistent Test for a Unit Root, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 12: 157–166. Maddala, G. S., and I. M. Kim (1998): Unit Roots, Cointegration and Structural Change. Cambridge. Marius, A., Mbratana, T., & Quentin, K. (2017). Assessing the Current Account Sustainability in ECCAS Economies: A Dual Cointegration Analysis, Economics Bulletin, 37, 3, 1873-1894. Ng, S., & Perron, P., (2001). Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power, Econometrica, 69, 6, 1519-1554. Perron, P. 1989. The Great Crash, Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis, Econometrica, 57, 1361-1401. Perron, P., & Yabu, T., (2009). Testing for Shifts in Trend With an Integrated or Stationary Noise Component, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 27, 3, 369-396. Perron, P., Shintani, M., & Yabu, T. 2017. Testing for Flexible Nonlinear Trends with an Integrated or Stationary Noise Component, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 79-5, 822–850. Prodan, R., 2008. Potential pitfalls in determining multiple structural changes with an application to purchasing power parity, Journal of Business and Economics Statistics. 26, 50-65. Rodrigues, P. & Taylor, R. (2012). The Flexible Fourier Form and Local Generalised Least Squares De- trended Unit Root Tests, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74, 5, 736-759. Schmidt, P. and Phillips, P. (1992). LM tests for a unit root in the presence of deterministic trends, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 257–287. Sollis, R. (2009). A simple unit root test against asymmetric STAR nonlinearity with an application to real exchange rate in Nordic countries, Economic Modelling, 26, 118–125. Taylor, A. M., (2002). A Century of current account dynamics, Journal of International Money and Finance, 21, 6, 725-748. Terasvirta, T., D. Tjostheim, and C.W.J. Granger (2010), Modelling nonlinear Economic time series. (Oxford University Press: New York). Trehan, B., & Walsh, C. (1991). Testing intertemporal budget constraints: Theory and application to US federal budget deficits and current account deficits. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23, 206– 223. Tsong, C., Lee, C. & Tsai, L. (2019). A parametric stationarity test with smooth breaks, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 23(2), 1-14. WDI, 2016. World Development Indicators. World Bank. Washington, DC. http://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/