Ning, Haokai (2020): On the Equivalence of Tariffs and Quotas with Incomplete Information.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_101512.pdf Download (468kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper compares the social welfare effects of tariffs and quotas as strategic trade policy instruments in an oligopolistic industry where the domestic market demand is uncertain and the policy is chosen before the uncertainty is resolved. The uncertain demand, once realized, is assumed to be available only to the domestic firm when the output game is played between domestic and foreign firms. To highlight our assertion, a simple scenario with linear demand, additive stochastic market shock, homogeneous products, and identical constant marginal costs is considered. It is shown that a tariff is superior to a quota regardless of the degree of uncertainty. Moreover, we also show that a prohibitive quota that results in autarky is always preferred to a quota at the free-trade level.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | On the Equivalence of Tariffs and Quotas with Incomplete Information |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Incomplete Information; Uncertainty; Bayesian Nash equilibrium; Tariff; Quota |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets |
Item ID: | 101512 |
Depositing User: | Haokai Ning |
Date Deposited: | 05 Jul 2020 16:26 |
Last Modified: | 05 Jul 2020 16:26 |
References: | Bhagwati, J. (1965) On the equivalence of tariffs and quotas, in Trade, Growth and the Balance of Payments: Essays in Honor of Gottfried Haberler(Ed.) R. E. Baldwin, Rand McNally, Chicago. Bhagwati, J. (1968) More on the equivalence of tariffs and quotas,The American Economic Review,58, 142–146. Chen, H. Y. and Hwang, H. (2006) Tariffs versus quotas under market price uncertainty,Review of World Economics,142, 181–194. Cooper, R. and Riezman, R. (1989) Uncertainty and the choice of trade policy in oligopolistic industries,The Review of Economic Studies,56, 129–140. Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1977) Tariffs vs. quotas as revenue raising devices under uncertainty,The American Economic Review,67, 975–981. Eldor, R. and Levin, D. (1990) Trade liberalization and domestic monopoly: a welfare analysis,Inter-national Economic Review,31, 773–782. Fishelson, G. and Flatters, F. (1975) The (non-)equivalence of optimal tariffs and quotas under uncertainty,Journal of International Economics,5, 385–393. Fung, K. C. (1989) Tariffs, quotas, and international oligopoly,Oxford Economic Papers,41, 749–757. Hwang, H. and Mai, C. C. (1988) On the equivalence of tariffs and quotas under duopoly: a conjectural variation approach,Journal of International Economics,24, 373–380. Itoh, M. and Ono, Y. (1984) Tariffs vs. quotas under duopoly of heterogeneous goods,Journal of International Economics,17, 359–373. Matschke, X. (2003) Tariff and quota equivalence in the presence of asymmetric information,Journal of International Economics,61, 209–223. Ning, H. (2020a) Choice of trade policy with incomplete information, manuscript, York University. Ning, H. (2020b) Strategic trade policy in reciprocal dumping model with incomplete information,manuscript, York University. Shibata, H. (1968) A note on the equivalence of tariffs and quotas,The American Economic Review,58, 137–142. Weitzman, M. L. (1974) Prices vs. quantities,The Review of Economic Studies,41, 477–491. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/101512 |