Breitenstein, Miriam and Anke, Carl-Philipp and Nguyen, Duc Khuong and Walther, Thomas (2019): Stranded Asset Risk and Political Uncertainty: The Impact of the Coal Phase-out on the German Coal Industry.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_101763.pdf Download (640kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We assess the value of stranded coal-fired power plants in Germany due to the critical phase- out by 2038. Within a Monte Carlo simulation, the scenarios under consideration (a slow decommissioning at the end of the technical lifetime in 2061, the highly probable phase-out by 2038, and an accelerated phase-out by 2030) are additionally assigned distributions to display the uncertainty of future developments. The results show an overall stranded asset value of €0.4 billion given the phase-out by 2038 and additional €14.3 billion if the phase-out is brought forward by eight years. This study also depicts the impacts of carbon pricing and the feed-in from renewable energy sources on the merit order and eventually the deterioration in economic conditions for hard coal and lignite power plants. Lastly, we illustrate immediate concerns for share prices of affected companies and contributes to closing the research gap between stranded physical and financial assets.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Stranded Asset Risk and Political Uncertainty: The Impact of the Coal Phase-out on the German Coal Industry |
English Title: | Stranded Asset Risk and Political Uncertainty: The Impact of the Coal Phase-out on the German Coal Industry |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Coal Phase-out; Energy transition; Germany; Stranded Assets |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods ; Simulation Methods L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L94 - Electric Utilities Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q38 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 101763 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Duc Khuong Nguyen |
Date Deposited: | 13 Jul 2020 05:59 |
Last Modified: | 13 Jul 2020 05:59 |
References: | Ansar, A., Caldecott, B., Tilbury, J., 2013. Stranded Assets and the Fossil Fuel Divestment Campaign: What Does Divestment Mean for the Valuation of Fossil Fuel Assets? University of Oxford’s Smith School Stranded Assets Programme. Atanasova, C., Schwartz, E.S., 2019. Stranded Fossil Fuel Reserves and Firm Value (Working Paper No. 26497). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26497 Balint, T., Lamperti, F., Mandel, A., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A., Sapio, A., 2017. Complexity and the Economics of Climate Change: A Survey and a Look Forward. Ecological Economics 138, 252–265. Barnett, M., Brock, W.A., Hansen, L.P., 2019. Pricing Uncertainty Induced by Climate Change. SSRN Journal 46. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3440301 Bloomberg, 2019. Stock Quotes Database [WWW Document]. Bloomberg.com. URL https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/stocks (accessed 9.30.19). Bloomberg New Energy Finance, 2013. Carbon Risk Valuation Tool. White Paper. Bos, K., Gupta, J., 2019. Stranded Assets and Stranded Resources: Implications for Climate Change Mitigation and Global Sustainable Development. Energy Research & Social Science 56, 101–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.025 Bos, K., Gupta, J., 2018. Climate Change: The Risks of Stranded Fossil Fuel Assets and Resources to the Developing World. Third World Quarterly 39, 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1387477 Breitenstein, M., Nguyen, D.K., Walther, T., 2019. Environmental Hazards and Risk Management in the Financial Sector: A Systematic Literature Review (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 3428953). Brunner, C., Deac, G., Braun, S., Zöphel, C., 2019. The future need for flexibility and the impact of fluctuating renewable power generation. Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.128 Bundesnetzagentur, 2019. Power Plant List for Germany [WWW Document]. https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/ElektrizitaetundGas/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Versorgungssicherheit/Erzeugungskapazitaeten/Kraftwerksliste/kraftwerksliste-node.html (accessed 7.10.19). Byrd, J., Cooperman, E.S., 2018. Investors and Stranded Asset Risk: Evidence from Shareholder Responses to Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) Events. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 8, 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2017.1418063 Cai, Y., Judd, K.L., Lontzek, T.S., 2017. The Social Cost of Carbon with Economic and Climate Risk. Hoover Institution Economics Working Paper. Caldecott, B., 2017. Introduction to Special Issue: Stranded Assets and the Environment. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1266748 Caldecott, B., Dericks, G., Tulloch, D.J., Liao, X., Kruitwagen, L., Bouveret, G., Mitchell, J., 2017. Stranded Assets and Thermal Coal in China: An Analysis of Environment-Related Risk Exposure. University of Oxford’s Smith School Stranded Assets Programme. Caldecott, B., Howarth, N., McSharry, P., 2013. Stranded Assets in Agriculture: Protecting Value from Environment-Related Risks. University of Oxford’s Smith School Stranded Assets Programme. Carbon Tracker Initiative, 2011. Unburnable Carbon - Are the World’s Financial Markets Carrying a Carbon Bubble? Carney, M., 2015. Breaking the Tragedy of the Horizon - Climate Change and Financial Stability. Speech by Mr. Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England and Chairman of the Financial Stability Board, at Lloyd’s of London on 29 September 2015. Client Earth, 2019. Kein Geld für alte Braunkohlekraftwerke. Climate Analytics, 2018. Science Based Coal Phase-Out Pathway for Germany in Line With the Paris Agreement 1.5°C Warming Limit. Dietz, S., Bowen, A., Dixon, C., Gradwell, P., 2016. ‘Climate Value at Risk’ of Global Financial Assets. Nature Clim Change 6, 676–679. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2972 Ernst & Young, 2016. Climate change: The Investment Perspective. European Commission, 2018. A Clean Planet for All: A European Long-Term Strategic Vision for a Prosperous, Modern, Competitive and Climate-Neutral Economy. Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2019. Kommission Wachstum, Strukturwandel und Beschäftigung: Abschlussbericht. Berlin. Forum Ökologisch-Soziale Marktwirtschaft, 2019. Lenkungs- und Verteilungswirkungen einer klimaschutzorientierten Reform der Energiesteuern, on behalf of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, 2018. Stromgestehungskosten Erneuerbare Energien. German Bundestag, 2018. Ausarbeitung: Stilllegung von Kohlekraftwerken. German Government, 2020. Bundesregierung | Aktuelles | Bund und Länder einigen sich auf Stilllegungspfad zum Kohleausstieg [WWW Document]. URL https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/einigung-zum-kohleausstieg-1712888 (accessed 1.27.20). Griffin, P.A., Jaffe, A.M., Lont, D.H., Dominguez-Faus, R., 2015. Science and the Stock Market: Investors’ Recognition of Unburnable Carbon. Energy Economics 52, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.028 Heinrichs, H.U., Schumann, D., Vögele, S., Biß, K.H., Shamon, H., Markewitz, P., Többen, J., Gillessen, B., Gotzens, F., Ernst, A., 2017. Integrated Assessment of a Phase-Out of Coal-Fired Power Plants in Germany. Energy 126, 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.017 HSBC Global Research, 2013. Oil & Carbon Revisited: Value at Risk from ‘Unburnable’ Reserves. HSBC Global Research, 2012. Coal and Carbon-Stranded Assets: Assessing the Risk. Institut für Protest- und Bewegungsforschung, 2019. Fridays for Future: Profil, Entstehung und Perspektiven der Protestbewegung in Deutschland. Institute for Climate Protection, Energy and Mobility, 2018. Stellungnahme zum Gutachten der Kanzlei „Redeker Sellner Dahs“ für den Deutschen BraunkohlenIndustrieverein (Debriv). Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, 2015. Open Letter to Finance Ministers in the Group of Seven (G7). International Energy Agency, 2018. World Energy Outlook 2018. Paris. International Renewable Energy Agency, 2017. Stranded Assets and Renewables - How the Energy Transition Affects the Value of Energy Reserves, Buildings and Capital Stock. IPCC, 2018. Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5°. Jewell, J., Vinichenko, V., Nacke, L., Cherp, A., 2019. Prospects for Powering Past Coal. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 592–597. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0509-6 Kepler Cheuvreux, 2014. Stranded Assets, Fossilised Revenues. Krause, F., Bach, W., Koomey, J., 1989. Energy Policy in the Greenhouse. International Project for Sustainable Energy Paths. Leipprand, A., Flachsland, C., 2018. Regime Destabilization in Energy Transitions: The German Debate on the Future of Coal. Energy Research & Social Science 40, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.004 Markard, J., 2018. The Next Phase of the Energy Transition and its Implications for Research and Policy. Nat Energy 3, 628–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7 Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S.C.B., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., Frame, D.J., Allen, M.R., 2009. Greenhouse Gas Emission Targets for Limiting Global Warming to 2°C. Nature 458, 1158–1162. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08017 Mercer Investment Consulting, 2015. Investing in a Time of Climate Change. Mercure, J.-F., Pollitt, H., Viñuales, J.E., Edwards, N.R., Holden, P.B., Chewpreecha, U., Salas, P., Sognnaes, I., Lam, A., Knobloch, F., 2018. Macroeconomic Impact of Stranded Fossil Fuel Assets. Nature Climate Change 8, 588. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0182-1 Michaels, R.J., 1994. Unused and Useless: The Strange Economics of Stranded Investment. The Electricity Journal 7, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/1040-6190(94)90054-X Monasterolo, I., Roventini, A., Foxon, T.J., 2019. Uncertainty of Climate Policies and Implications for Economics and Finance: An Evolutionary Economics Approach. Ecological Economics 163, 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.012 Pahle, M., 2010. Germany’s Dash for Coal: Exploring Drivers and Factors. Energy Policy 38, 3431–3442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.017 Rentier, G., Lelieveldt, H., Kramer, G.J., 2019. Varieties of Coal-Fired Power Phase-Out Across Europe. Energy Policy 132, 620–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.042 Rinscheid, A., Wüstenhagen, R., 2019. Germany’s Decision to Phase-out Coal by 2038 Lags Behind Citizens’ Timing Preferences. Nature Energy 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0460-9 Sen, S., von Schickfus, M.-T., 2018. Climate Policy, Stranded Assets, and Investors’ Expectations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 102–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102277 Silver, N., 2017. Blindness to Risk: Why Institutional Investors Ignore the Risk of Stranded Assets. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 7, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1207996 Steitz, C., Eckert, V., 2019. Coal Compensation Talks With Government Driven by Facts: RWE CEO [WWW Document]. Reuters. URL https://www.reuters.com/article/us-rwe-results-coal-idUSKCN1V40TT (accessed 9.30.19). The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2015. The Cost of Inaction: Recognising the Value at Risk from Climate Change. UBS, 2016. Stranded Assets: What Lies Beneath? Umweltbundesamt, 2019. Energiebedingte Emissionen [WWW Document]. URL https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/energie/energiebedingte-emissionen (accessed 10.16.19). UNFCCC, 2015. Summary of the Paris Agreement [WWW Document]. URL https://unfccc.int/resource/bigpicture/ (accessed 6.13.19). van der Ploeg, F., Rezai, A., 2019. The Risk of Policy Tipping and Stranded Carbon Assets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 102–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102258 World Resources Institute, UNEP Finance Initiative, 2016. Carbon Asset Risk Discussion Framework. Zhao, S., Alexandroff, A., 2019. Current and Future Struggles to Eliminate Coal. Energy Policy 129, 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.031 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/101763 |